CV-18 Fujian - Type 003 Aircraft Carrier News & Discussions

[Deino]

The AL-31F got more explosive power in a short burst than both WS-10 and American jet engines, that's why it is the best engine for the ski-jump carriers.

Right now with the catapult, the J-15 can equip with the WS-10H despite having less explosive power.

äääähhmm ... but that was not my question ??

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

äääähhmm ... but that was not my question ??

The landing gear of the J-15B is also different, it is designated for the catapult takeoff.

 

[cirr]

Looks though a decision has been reached on EMALS.....

 

[luciferdd]

73楼 slayerhuahua 发消息 只看他
2017-7-4 16:45
本帖最后由 slayerhuahua 于 2017-7-4 16:57 编辑

换就换呗，不得不说XX4所这次挺丢人。而且反正打了那么多老虎了总有人承担责任了，不用现在在位的顶雷，皆大欢喜，只是苦了加班改图纸的基层

这件事就是徐，郭两个国贼把持军委给国家重大装备带来严重影响的又一铁证

002 will have EMALS is confirmed by huahua.

 

[j20blackdragon]

055, 002 with EMALS, and submersible arsenal ship?!

 

[Deino]

But with the EMALS they need a huge amount of electricity ... so 002 needs to be a CVN !

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

But with the EMALS they need a huge amount of electricity ... so 002 needs to be a CVN !

They claim that theoretically the conventional power can also satisfy the demand of the EMALS, since China has already developed the superconductivity technology a few years ago.

BTW, the construction of the Type 002 has already been halted, and the EMALS has replaced the steam catapult, so the propulsion for the new Type 002 has not been decided yet, since anything can happen right now.

 

[sheik]

Looks though a decision has been reached on EMALS.....

That makes much more sense.

But with the EMALS they need a huge amount of electricity ... so 002 needs to be a CVN !

Not necessarily. As long as the engines and generators are powerful enough, they can accommodate the EMALS system. I don't think 002 will be CVN, and Ma and PLA must have evaluated the feasibility (of using EMALS w/o nuclear reactors).

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

That makes much more sense.



Not necessarily. As long as the engines and generators are powerful enough, they can accommodate the EMALS system. I don't think 002 will be CVN, and Ma and PLA must have evaluated the feasibility (of using EMALS w/o nuclear reactors).

With the Type 002 serves as the test platform for the new technologies like EMALS/AAG/Dual Band Radar, everything for the Type 003 will be greatly facilitated.

The Gerald Ford class is now getting into big trouble because the USN was getting too greedy, they wanted to put everything together at once.

Chinese AAG vs American AAG

 

[lmjiao]

With the Type 002 serves as the test platform for the new technologies like EMALS/AAG/Dual Band Radar, everything for the Type 003 will be greatly facilitated.

The Gerald Ford class is now getting into big trouble because the USN was getting too greedy, they wanted to put everything together at once.

Chinese AAG vs American AAG


View attachment 408385

View attachment 408386

I have two twin boys and their difference is still larger than these two.

But with the EMALS they need a huge amount of electricity ... so 002 needs to be a CVN !

No, it's still conventional.

Accturally, the EMALS consumes less power than steam catapult. What 002 needs is just more electricity less steam. The demand of total power is even smaller.

 

[SingaporeGuy]

Congrats to china.

From singapore

 

[waja2000]

But with the EMALS they need a huge amount of electricity ... so 002 needs to be a CVN !

EMALS most difficult is on power storage, need big and fast enough to charge and release power instantly (during heavy operation). electric should no the issue just extra Gas turbine will be enough, plus get energy recovery from Electromagnetic aircraft arrestor system.
China is master in batteries and electrical engineering too.

 

[Title123]

Type002 shall have CATOBA mix with STOBA or not when CATOBA damage it still can uses STOBA in case of emergency airclaft lounching?

 

[lcloo]

Type002 shall have CATOBA mix with STOBA or not when CATOBA damage it still can uses STOBA in case of emergency airclaft lounching?

A mix of catapult launch and ski ramp launch is a sign of no confidence on the reliability of the catapult system.

Morever, there are 3 or 4 catapult systems on the ship, if one mal-function, the others can still carry on launching. If the mal-function is not severe, onboard machine shop should be able to repair it while the ship is still at sea.

 

[lmjiao]

Type002 shall have CATOBA mix with STOBA or not when CATOBA damage it still can uses STOBA in case of emergency airclaft lounching?

002 has no ski-junp, only EMALS.