Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some minor news from the construction site ... some work is going on under these new movable shelters;
View attachment 647423
I wish the picture was higher resolutionSome minor news from the construction site ... some work is going on under these new movable shelters;
View attachment 647423
New Recruit
Then tell me, which conventional carrier in the history has displaced over 80,000 metric tons?
New Recruit
In order to power the Type 003, they would need to re-design a brand new steam boiler system that would be much more time consuming than the nuclear powered design.
China now has very few ships that use the steam boilers. Except the Type 001/002, all destroyers that use the steam boilers are all outdated, and the continuation of the same class of ships will not be built anymore.
To re-design a brand new steam boiler system just for 1-2 carriers will be a nightmare for the maintenance, and the cost can never be covered. It is very unlikely for the PLAN to follow that path.
New Recruit
ACP100
I think I have mentioned this before.
It is a quite mature technology, and less risky than to develop a whole new steam boiler system that powers a ship that outweighs the Kitty Hawk class by 20,000 metric tons.
are these modules too slightly right besides these movable shelters?
View attachment 647573 View attachment 647574
Oh I’m sorry, but there are some. 4 of the Kitty Hawk class and 4 of Forrestal Class. 8 of them in total, all have a displacement of more than 80k tons, with CONVENTIONAL power.
Oh, so u mean those 956 destroyers are outdated? What about 051B? And 051C? Do u mean these ships are outdated?
And now u r claiming 003 is a ship bigger than Nimitz class, almost as big as the Ford class. Is this what u mean?
And now u r claiming 003 is a ship bigger than Nimitz class, almost as big as the Ford class. Is this what u mean?
To be fair I didn't know the 003 was larger than the Nimitz. I always assumed it was in the Kitty Hawk size range, maybe slightly larger?Why are you so pessimistic and behaving like a SCIENCETIFIC weakling ??
To be fair I didn't know the 003 was larger than the Nimitz. I always assumed it was in the Kitty Hawk size range, maybe slightly larger?
Why are you so pessimistic and behaving like a SCIENCETIFIC weakling ??
What does this have to do with the 003 carrier?I am always ANGRY ... that there are so many Chinese Intellectual WEAKLING from CHN who
have been brainwashed by the western / Murican, and always use a double standard to judge the Murican Scientific achievement and double standard to measure Murican Global Criminal behaviors for the last 200 years.
And, these Chinese Intellectual WEAKLING always believe the Tank Man myth.
Proof:
Just quickly check this video ~ before YouTube / Google remove it:
1989 Tank Man myth: ( u can jump ahead to time = 07:30 )
===
Back to main topic.