What's new

Crucial Indian Cruise Missile Tests In A Year.

It better not miss.
You can fire ten interceptors per BrahMos. Why not?

In fact, the BrahMos is easier to intercept from front because of its fast speed -- because it cannot change direction as quickly due to large forward momentum.

For 1 brahmos u will fire 10 interceptors:cheesy:

Wat if those 10 interceptors trying to hit brahmos collide themselves and tangled and gets deep in ocean..?

And for u r note..
We can launch 5 brahmos at one ship(thats reality) will u launch 50 interceptors to block all of them.....?

wat about this...
 
.
It better not miss.
You can fire ten interceptors per BrahMos. Why not?

In fact, the BrahMos is easier to intercept from front because of its fast speed -- because it cannot change direction as quickly due to large forward momentum.

The thing is.. On account of its sheer speed, The brahmos will be in an out of a particular radars targetting field in a few seconds. Not enough to launch SAMs. And neither India nor Pakistan still have a network centric system for multiple radars to work in tandem.
 
.
Sigh. We've been through this before...

- BrahMos gets launched. Let's say the enemy detects it and figures out the general area where it's headed. Remember, the IR signature is generated from body friction so it's going out in all directions. And the BrahMos cannot fly as low as a subsonic missile.

- Interceptors are launched from the estimated target location. They don't need to catch up to BrahMos because it is coming at them.

- When the BrahMos comes within range of the interceptor's IR sensor, all it has to do is to manoeuver itself in the BrahMos' flight path. The interceptor is passive so the BrahMos doesn't know it is being tracked and, in any case, it can only do so much manoeuvering due to it's large forward momentum.

Bottom line, once the BrahMos is detected, it is easy to track and intercept. It's only hope is that it is detected too late by the enemy.

as my friend said 5min before it reach it targets with steep dive and large manuvers ,it close to impossible to detect .No BMD present till now intercept a Supersonic cruise missile flying as close as 30to 50mts altitude...i gave you a link check out more and come out of your world of ignorance.
 
.
And btw Sohni.. Provide me with a link on your 'extremely high IR signature' theory?
 
.
A scientist, who witnessed the test,
said the advanced version of BrahMos
Block-II was test fired this time. "The
missile flew in the designated complex
trajectory including large manoeuvres
and steep dive. This is the first time that a supersonic dive has been
realised by a cruise missile," he said.
 
.
For 1 brahmos u will fire 10 interceptors:cheesy:

Wat if those 10 interceptors trying to hit brahmos collide themselves and tangled and gets deep in ocean..?

And for u r note..
We can launch 5 brahmos at one ship(thats reality) will u launch 50 interceptors to block all of them.....?

wat about this...

Now we are talking numbers, not concept.
Btw, did you know that during the first Gulf War, it took 10 Patriot missiles @ 1 million each to intercept one Scud @ 100,000?


The thing is.. On account of its sheer speed, The brahmos will be in an out of a particular radars targetting field in a few seconds. Not enough to launch SAMs. And neither India nor Pakistan still have a network centric system for multiple radars to work in tandem.

I don't think such an intercept missile system exists, but it is theoretically possible to build one.
 
.
it doesn't matter whether it 1000km ....stealth is more important....i think 700km is enough to reach enemies bases and do the damage.
 
.
It better not miss.
You can fire ten interceptors per BrahMos. Why not?

In fact, the BrahMos is easier to intercept from front because of its fast speed -- because it cannot change direction as quickly due to large forward momentum.

The whole game between aircraft is about agility and evasive manoeuvers. BrahMos sacrifices agility for speed (i.e. surprise). Also keep in mind that the BrahMos is unlikely to take evasive action when it gets close to its target. Part of its punch is the huge kinetic energy, and each course change takes away from the final punch.

Well there cannot be a Forward Momentum , Because Momentum by itself defines Velocity not Speed, so if You say Brahmos does not change its Trajectory then how can It have a Forward Momentum??
 
.
Sigh. We've been through this before...

- BrahMos gets launched. Let's say the enemy detects it and figures out the general area where it's headed. Remember, the IR signature is generated from body friction so it's going out in all directions. And the BrahMos cannot fly as low as a subsonic missile.

What IR systems you have to detect it at long range? Nothing. Brahmos can fly like all sea skimming missile.

- Interceptors are launched from the estimated target location. They don't need to catch up to BrahMos because it is coming at them.

lol No, Brahmos don't follow the normal trajectory. It can dive.

- When the BrahMos comes within range of the interceptor's IR sensor, all it has to do is to manoeuver itself in the BrahMos' flight path. The interceptor is passive so the BrahMos doesn't know it is being tracked and, in any case, it can only do so much manoeuvering due to it's large forward momentum.

Which interceptor has such IR sensors? :angel: Brahmos cruises at a speed of Mach 2.8 at sea level the target ship will get only few seconds to react when it sees Brahmos.

Bottom line, once the BrahMos is detected, it is easy to track and intercept. It's only hope is that it is detected too late by the enemy.

Easy to track and intercept!!!! What IR sensor you got to track it? and which IR homing interceptor are you talking about????? :eek:
 
. . .
What IR systems you have to detect it at long range? Nothing. Brahmos can fly like all sea skimming missile.



lol No, Brahmos don't follow the normal trajectory. It can dive.



Which interceptor has such IR sensors? :angel: Brahmos cruises at a speed of Mach 2.8 at sea level the target ship will get only few seconds to react when it sees Brahmos.


Easy to track and intercept!!!! What IR sensor you got to track it? and which IR homing interceptor are you talking about????? :eek:

leave it bro !i even provided the link where in sept 10 ,last year bramos most creates world record to be the 1st supersonic cruise missile which dive and do large manuver...
 
.
Now we are talking numbers, not concept.
Btw, did you know that during the first Gulf War, it took 10 Patriot missiles @ 1 million each to intercept one Scud @ 100,000?




I don't think such an intercept missile system exists, but it is theoretically possible to build one.

:lol: we r talking about the latest Brahmos which cruises at 3mach,can steep dive and can also cruise 10 meters above sea level...
 
.
Now we are talking numbers, not concept.
Btw, did you know that during the first Gulf War, it took 10 Patriot missiles @ 1 million each to intercept one Scud @ 100,000?




I don't think such an intercept missile system exists, but it is theoretically possible to build one.

First of all the scud was a ballistic missile. They are much more difficult to intercept. Cruise missiles are like pilotless planes.

And I know the IAF is working majorly towards developing network centric warfare. Do you have links on such a pakistani progeramme? Thanks in advance
 
.
Well there cannot be a Forward Momentum , Because Momentum by itself defines Velocity not Speed, so if You say Brahmos does not change its Trajectory then how can It have a Forward Momentum??

Of course it can change trajectory. I only said that it cannot make sharp manoeuvers due to its huge forward momemtum.
Even its famous dive will occur over a large distance in a relatively flattened curve. That's just physics.

Does Pakistan have those evolved sea sparrows

I said BrahMos can be intercepted; I didn't say Pakistan has the interceptor technology.
But you can bet China is working on it.

What IR systems you have to detect it at long range?

US satellites can detect a house fire from space. The technology is there although, I admit, Pakistan may not have it.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom