Creation of Bangladesh: Shining Moment or Strategic Blunder

[nForce]

One Muslim warrior Bakhtiyar Khilji, 12 horseman showed up with Islamic swords and all Hindu king ran away from Bengal. Put the history in prospective.

Sher e Bengal's mother tongue was Urdu and he was speaking Urdu more than Bangla. So I do not think he was in love with Bengaliat like you or Iajdani.

What are you trying to say here???every Mughal emperor made sure that he goes after his own father's head,one Mirzafar made sure that the British rule is well established in India,the "Khan Sena" went on to **** as many Bengali girls as they could.But does that generalize all the Muslims?? Likewise,every Muslim is not Bakhtiyar Khilji.What he did was about 800 years ago was amazing by any scale,but that does not mean that such a feat has been repeated every other day.The same Bakhtiyar Khiliji of whom you are talking about died during retreat after leading a disastrous campaign into Tibet.So,by your logic,every Muslim is inferior to the Tibetans,isnt it??


How much ill informed can you be?? You seriously need a history teacher........

 

[LaBong]

One Muslim warrior Bakhtiyar Khilji, 12 horseman showed up with Islamic swords and all Hindu king ran away from Bengal. Put the history in prospective.

Sher e Bengal's mother tongue was Urdu and he was speaking Urdu more than Bangla. So I do not think he was in love with Bengaliat like you or Iajdani.

Your hero was the worst kind of scoundrel in Muslim invading history. Read it if u’ve time-


“It is sometimes misleadingly asserted that Muhammad Bakhtiyar Khilji conquered Nadiya, the capital of Bengal with only 18 horsemen. This is incorrect. The Tabakat-i-Nasiri by Minhaj-us- Siraj states that Bakhtiyar Khilji "suddenly appeared before the city of Nadiya with only eighteen horsemen, the remainder of his army was left to follow." (Elliot & Dowson, pp. 308-309)

This shows that Muhammad Bakhtiyar Khilji entered Nadiya with a bodyguard-cum-escort of eighteen horsemen professing great friendship but later, when joined by the main body of his troops also on a similar plea, they all went berserk and all of a sudden pounced upon the poor, unarmed, defenseless citizenry indulging in a fanatic orgy of loot, **** and massacre.

Tabakat-i-Nasiri itself gives a clear indication of Khilji's treacherous entry into Nadiya. We are told: "Muhammad Bakhtiyar did not molest any man, but went on peaceably and without ostentation, so that none could suspect who he was. The people rather thought he was a merchant who had brought horses for sale. In this manner he reached the gate of Rai Lakhminiya's palace, when he drew his sword and commenced his attack. At this time, the Rai was at his dinner and gold and silver dishes filled with food were placed before him. All of a sudden a cry was raised at the gate of the palace and in the city. Before he could ascertain what had occurred, Bakhtiyar had rushed into the palace and put a number of men to the sword. The Rai fled bare-footed by the rear of the palace, and his whole treasure and all his wives and maid- servants, attendants and women fell into the hands of the invader. Numerous elephants were taken and so much booty was obtained by the Mohammedans as is beyond all compute...Bakhtiyar destroyed the city of Nadiya and established his seat of government at Lakhnauti."

 

[TopCat]

Abir,
You are right about Khilji but ignore the fact that Sena Dynasty was very weak at that time and totally out of touch from its people. Even though Khilji defeated Lakman sen in Nadia (knowing he is defenseless) who was in a retirement and away from his capital Gaur where his son was in charge. His son could not come up with a response and eventually surrendered the whole kingdom to Khilji invaders.

PS: Khilji was great worrior and a planner. He intentionally did not attack Gaur anticipating stiff resistance.

 

[Skies]

A person who is not agreeing with your opinion/B*llSh!t is propagandist and all others are innocent?? Peoples opinion is not a mutable play-doh that you can change it with your own way. Many BD's hate Pakistan and many not but one thing is for sure that Mostly BD's hate India for their continuous propaganda and their effort to take full control over BD's policies. Even likes of Skies, who is clearly anti-Pakistan on many occasions seems to be agreeing with Al-Zakir!

It has become habit of Indians to blame Mods, when they come across any member having opinion different to what they were expecting. For a reminder, you are here despite of your b8lls!ts because you are Elite Member. Policy of throwing out members is applicable to juniors strictly. Think...!

Now Back to the topic. Discuss topic in hand instead of discussing a member.

I'm only anti Pakistani if Pakistani people want to undermine Bangladeshi peole without valid reason. Otherwise, I like PK very much for PK's history, cultural and social system and literature.

And about AL-Zakir Bhai, I would like to say him to use smooth language against Hindus or others. Cos I believe that people follow different religions for spiritual peace-n-happiness by submitting him/herself to the believed-power of Allah/God/Debota. We can not hurt other people's sentiment directly if different people seek for peace by believing in different way. The different is we are searching for peace through Islam while others are by other religions. It's depend on individuals' separate believe and individual believe of people somehow brings peace in the believers. But I'm sure Islam is the rightest way for seeking peace as Allah made everything, and he knows every secrets and he said to follow Islam. And I believe that Islam can give you maximum peace if it is followed properly. And Muslims have right to stand against anti-Muslims if they want to harm. So we Muslims can invite others for Islam but there is benefit if we insult other people's believe/sentiment who also seek for peace in different way. IMO.


But I have no problem AL-Zakir vhai uses harsh language against AL.

 

[Al-zakir]

Who can fix an ignorant? Yur source please..

Can not expect anything different from pathological Liar like you. I know you and rest of the munafiq awami can not come up with credible answer but I would like to throw a challenge on open forum.

Old habit doesn't go away that easy so here it goes.

How many Mauluna or Islamist(Jamat, shibir or other Islamic parties) has been accused for raping after the creation of Bangladesh compare to Awami dogs(including son of Mujib) and Awami munafiq mukti?

Take a tour to Bd's jail and justice system and you would find out most of them rapist belongs to Awami type thugs.

 

[TopCat]

Can not expect anything different from pathological Liar like you. I know you and rest of the munafiq awami can not come up with credible answer but I would like to throw a challenge on open forum.

Old habit doesn't go away that easy so here it goes.

How many Mauluna or Islamist(Jamat, shibir or other Islamic parties) has been accused for raping after the creation of Bangladesh compare to Awami dogs(including son of Mujib) and Awami munafiq mukti?

Take a tour to Bd's jail and justice system and you would find out most of them rapist belongs to Awami type thugs.

I said source.. not your foul language..
Everytime you use foul lnaguage you just expose your ancestrie's heritage... You cant denigrate anybody with that but rather denigrate your own 14 generation..

 

[Skies]

I do not know why Iajdani ignores AL's crimes if he is a good person?

 

[nForce]

Can not expect anything different from pathological Liar like you. I know you and rest of the munafiq awami can not come up with credible answer but I would like to throw a challenge on open forum.

Old habit doesn't go away that easy so here it goes.

How many Mauluna or Islamist(Jamat, shibir or other Islamic parties) has been accused for raping after the creation of Bangladesh compare to Awami dogs(including son of Mujib) and Awami munafiq mukti?

Take a tour to Bd's jail and justice system and you would find out most of them rapist belongs to Awami type thugs.

and this time the sources are????

 

[Al-zakir]

Your hero was the worst kind of scoundrel in Muslim invading history. Read it if u’ve time-

No need. He has done more than enough for us to designate him as one of the greatest hero in the context of Bd. we know Hindus hate him but that is cool with us.

 

[LaBong]

Abir,
You are right about Khilji but ignore the fact that Sena Dynasty was very weak at that time and totally out of touch from its people. Even though Khilji defeated Lakman sen in Nadia (knowing he is defenseless) who was in a retirement and away from his capital Gaur where his son was in charge. His son could not come up with a response and eventually surrendered the whole kingdom to Khilji invaders.

PS: Khilji was great worrior and a planner. He intentionally did not attack Gaur anticipating stiff resistance.

Sena dynasty was incompetent and noway represents Bengal. I was only putting thing into perspective for Al-Zakir. Don't know if Khilji was great warrior, but a clever planner for sure.

 

[LaBong]

No need. He has done more than enough for us to designate him as one of the greatest hero in the context of Bd. we know Hindus hate him but that is cool with us.

Dude what the eff wrong with you? Let me break a news to you -- There are people in world who don't consider themselves Hindu, Muslim, Christian etc, they go by the name Human.

 

[desiman]

I do not know why Iajdani ignores AL's crimes if he is a good person?

and how do you ignore Pakistan's ?

 

[TopCat]

I do not know why Iajdani ignores AL's crimes if he is a good person?

You are too naive to see that. We do talk about BD politics in appropriate platform. I dont belong to AL neither BNP. I only see the Government of Bangladesh and see it in that perspective. Everybody has their own baggage, be it BNP or AL.

 

[humanfirst]

No need. He has done more than enough for us to designate him as one of the greatest hero in the context of Bd. we know Hindus hate him but that is cool with us.

Buddy it is off topic but please answer me.Do you think muslims have the moral right to invade other countries while when armies belonging to other religions invade muslims it is evil and wrong?

 

[Skies]

and how do you ignore Pakistan's ?

LoL, do you want to say if I ignore PK's past crimes then he can also ignores AL's present crimes?

BTW, it was an war. So people were killed by PK in 71 to keep the situation in hand. BD will also do the same thing if anything like that happen in BD. As like India is doing in Kashmir now. But I criticize and blame PK for it's misrule which dissatisfied BD people and led to the thinking of separation and your India and conspirators took that chance to break PK and to make a weak BD. But I'm not like AL who tries to attract people by 71 who has nothing else to get public support. And I found present PK people have well wish for BD and we should think about that now but not past.

BTW, is not it better to stay away when two BDmen are talking about AL. Why you guys are desperate?

You are too naive to see that. We do talk about BD politics in appropriate platform. I dont belong to AL neither BNP. I only see the Government of Bangladesh and see it in that perspective.

Well, make sure that if your so-called appropriate platform does not failed to criticize AL's crimes.