What's new

Controversy over Rampal power plant site

BDforever

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
14,387
Reaction score
8
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Green activists continue to protest setting up of proposed 1320 megawatt coal-fired power plant at Rampal in Bagerhat, which as they say, would destroy the Sundarbans which is only 14 kilometres from the project site. The environmentalists last week rejected the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) report on the power plant. They observed that the EIA report, prepared by the relevant department of the government, did not take into consideration most of the important aspects of the environment of the Sundarbans, its ecology, flora and fauna as well as a large number of local people.

Tahsin Ahmed, a leading environmentalist told a consultative meeting, organized by the Power Division on April 12 last that the proposed power plant will destroy the world heritage site. "We need electricity, but not at the cost of the Sundarbans", he was quoted as saying at the meeting. The meeting held at the Bidyut Bhaban in the city discussed EIA report on the proposed power plant at Rampal.

Engineer Shahidullah, Convener of the National Committee to Protect Oil, Gas and Power, informed the meeting that if the coal-fired power plant project is implemented nearer to the Sundarbans, it would cause more natural disasters like Sidr and Aila which damaged properties worth about Taka 100 billion (10,000 crore). He referred to his own study on the damage to the affected area.

The areas devastated by the Sidr and Aila still continue to suffer a loss of Taka 50 billion (5,000 crore) annually while the Bangladesh will derive a benefit of Taka 30 billion (3,000 crore) out of electricity.

Speaking at the meeting, environmentalist Iqbal Habib urged the government not to set up the power plant near the Sundarbans. Before the EIA study was done, Iqbal Habib alleged, the government finalized the plan for setting up the power plant at Rampal.

Mr. Abdul Matin, general secretary of Bangladesh Poribesh Andolon (BAPA) said that two expert teams of environmentalists of Khulna University and Mymensingh Agricultural University, completed separate studies on the impact of proposed coal-fired power plant at Rampal. Both the studies, he mentioned, projected 81% negative impact on the Sundarbans due to setting up of the power plant.

Experts at the meeting wanted to know how the National Thermal Power Company (NTPC) of India could obtain the clearance for the Rampal project when the same Indian company was not allowed to build coal-based power plant on the Indian side of the world's largest mangrove forest.

It may be mentioned that the Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) had signed a deal on January 29 last year with the NTPC of India to build the power plant. The proposed project, on an area of over 1834 acres of land, is situated 14 kilometres north of the Sundarbans. It will be the country's largest power plant. Green activists have been expressing concern over the probable adverse effect on the bio-diversity of the Sundarbans for quite a long time with a call to shift the proposed plant to a place, distant from the forest.

Salinity and river erosion have already started taking their tolls on the green belts that surround the Sundarbans. Environmentalists fear that if corrective measures are not taken right now, the green belts around the mangrove forest will face a serious threat to their existence. Already excessive salinity has resulted in the deaths of large number of trees and vegetations at the coastal areas including Sarankhola and Morrelganj. Vast tracts of land along the coastal areas of the forest have been devoured by river erosion. Excessive saline water and heavy deposit of sand at the roots of trees following Cyclone Sidr and Aila in 2007 and 2010 have destroyed a large number of plants and trees such as Kewra, Huila, Palm and coconut.

We suggest that if the observation made by the experts on probable environmental hazards to the Sundarbans has any basis, it should be measured urgently by the competent authority before work on the proposed thermal power plant begins at Rampal. It is not difficult to find out a suitable alternative site for the power project in the country. True, we need electricity badly for country's overall development, but surely not at the cost of our precious wonder of nature -- the Sundarbans.

source: Controversy over Rampal power plant site :: Financial Express :: Financial Newspaper of Bangladesh
 
NTPC never had a plan to build up a power plant near Sundar Ban on Indian side.It was denied a project in Madhya pradesh over environmental issues.
Sundar ban should always be kept away from these kind of projects.This site is already facing trouble due to global warming.
 
Is there any coal reserve in BD, From where coal will be procured for such a big power plant.

And yes if located so near to sunder ban power plant will harm environment.
 
My brother and his friends wanted to do a documentary about ram pal power plant,they were escorted out by police.they documented some ppl who used to run projects with us aid fund.last year the project was shut down, funds withdrawn,because the beneficiary of the project(local mouali,fisherman)opposing the power plant project.
Please also read the reason behind as to why salt water is more in ratio then sweet water in sundarban,due to less water supply through rivers sea water is replacing sweet water vacume in these channels.
 
My brother and his friends wanted to do a documentary about ram pal power plant,they were escorted out by police.they documented some ppl who used to run projects with us aid fund.last year the project was shut down, funds withdrawn,because the beneficiary of the project(local mouali,fisherman)opposing the power plant project.
Please also read the reason behind as to why salt water is more in ratio then sweet water in sundarban,due to less water supply through rivers sea water is replacing sweet water vacume in these channels.

Why be so polite and not mention the Farakka Barrage and how it is making Bangladesh desert?
Farakka Barrage - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sharing the water of the Ganges - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Instead of coal power, we should look at new generation nuclear power:
List of small nuclear reactor designs - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
KAERI - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

what about Wind Power Plant ? need to see if we have that kind of project.
 
what about Wind Power Plant ? need to see if we have that kind of project.

Wind power is good, we have plenty of coastal wind, we should utilize that. But these plants have to be built strong enough to withstand cyclones. Both Wind and solar are good for hard to reach areas, where transmission lines are expensive and for small house hold needs. But for large scale industrial consumption, the only substitute for fossil fuel power is nuclear. New generation nuclear is the way to go for our industrial needs.
 
Why be so polite and not mention the Farakka Barrage and how it is making Bangladesh desert?
How can a barrage make Bangladesh a desert. :omghaha: Are you observing same with Chinese Dams on Brahmaputra. :cheesy:

The plant should built in India using their coal. And then transmit power to BD.

If the plant is built in India, why will we allow it transmitting to Bangladesh.
 
How can a barrage make Bangladesh a desert. :omghaha: Are you observing same with Chinese Dams on Brahmaputra. :cheesy:



If the plant is built in India, why will we allow it transmitting to Bangladesh.

ARE BEKUB,you will also lose your said of sundarban if both our countrys power players go with this project.
 
Awami fagots doing what they are installed to do.

Wind power is good, we have plenty of coastal wind, we should utilize that. But these plants have to be built strong enough to withstand cyclones. Both Wind and solar are good for hard to reach areas, where transmission lines are expensive and for small house hold needs. But for large scale industrial consumption, the only substitute for fossil fuel power is nuclear. New generation nuclear is the way to go for our industrial needs.

Isn't wind power expensive? Both wind and solar takes up a lot of space and investment for too little energy. Rather we implement a system of compulsory solar panels in building roof tops as to reduce pressure on the national grid and this may go a long way in ensuring energy security.

Nuclear is a good option and is cost effective in the long run but requires large investment at the very beginning. In the future there might be small 150-300 MW 3rd gen nuclear plants with relatively low cost. Our energy mix should be heavily dependent on domestic coal (or high quality coals from Indoneshia/AUS) and gas along with nuclear. House based solar panels would add to the mix.
 
How can a barrage make Bangladesh a desert. :omghaha: Are you observing same with Chinese Dams on Brahmaputra. :cheesy:

The same old ramblings like a boring tape recorder. China made it clear that their dams are Run off the river projects. And besides why should we look for a mythical bogeyman in china when we have a proven enemy in India and its water terrorism. Does it make sense to U that BD tags along with a country that openly robs it off its rightful share against a country that has yet to show and have next to nil chances of ever being hostile to BD. Fart somewhere else.


If the plant is built in India, why will we allow it transmitting to Bangladesh.

Valid point. Now I wonder why dalal fagots in our country allowing transmission of power to India. Oh yeah, may be its because India asked those fagots to do it. Bunch of hypocrites.
 
Back
Top Bottom