CM Punjab Runoff elections 22 July

[Acetic Acid]

Constitution says parliamentary leader decides who gets to be voted not parliamentary head Patwari

Not only constitution supreme court decision also said the same to which this patwaris is referring

 

[Norwegian]

It was bound to happen, when such a horrible decision was made in favor of PTI by the SC earlier it was obvious that it was going to get abused further down the line and now ironically it has happened against PTI themselves. This whole thing is a clown show, like i stated many months prior, all these parties are part of the circus that continually focuses on politics and that ultimately trumps national interests.

That decision was about horse trading and lotacracy, not about voting your own party man Patwari

 

[HttpError]

Naara Awaam Da
Zardari Haram Da

View attachment 864213

This Ugly MF is the biggest Scum of Pakistan, as long as this MF is alive we will keep getting destroyed like this.

 

[Jango]

He can't because Courts ruled in favor of PTI last time and the decision of THAT case is what is being cited by PMLN+PPP.

He can, because the SC judgement mentioned the parliamentary party in the judgment.

The difference between then and now is that that PTI parliamentary party gave a direction which was opposed, but now the Q parliamentary party did not give any such direction.

 

[Mirzali Khan]

Okay guys today proved

Akbar Bugti and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was right!!!!

 

[Tomcats]

Constitution says parliamentary leader decides who gets to be voted not parliamentary head Patwari

Yeah and SC interpreted it differently in agreement with PTI's stance on it. PTI said parliamentary head. Now SC decision is being cited.

 

[Norwegian]

Naara Awaam Da
Zardari Haram Da

View attachment 864213

Frontman of neutrals and US

 

[Wood]

I just realized that the father is PM and son is CM (of Punjab). It is a little too convenient for the family

 

[Olympus81]

This country is on the verge of civil war.

All credits goes to establishment.

Acha hai. There needs to be a final standoff. The sooner it happens the better for everyone.

 

[El Observer]

 

[Imran Khan]

سپریم کوٹھا بند پڑا ہے اور باجوہ سونے چلا گیا یہ سب شو دیکھ کر ۔

 

[Norwegian]

The people who are drawing comparisons between the PTI defection reference and this one seriously need to get their brains checked.

1- This time, the parliamentary party is all in unison, and the parliamentary head did not give any direction contrary to the vote. With PTI, the parliamentary PTI did give an opposite direction to the party.

2- The party head has no authority to give a direction to the parliamentary party. He can only send a reference to disqualify him.

3- The SC judgement is also very clear, it mentions the parliamentary party, not political party with regards to the judgement.

But Patwari Haramkhor lota speaker Dost Mazari didn't know that.

Yeah and SC interpreted it differently in agreement with PTI's stance on it. PTI said parliamentary head. Now SC decision is being cited.

SC cannot overrule the constitution. Constitution says parliamentary leader

 

[Acetic Acid]

The people who are drawing comparisons between the PTI defection reference and this one seriously need to get their brains checked.

1- This time, the parliamentary party is all in unison, and the parliamentary head did not give any direction contrary to the vote. With PTI, the parliamentary PTI did give an opposite direction to the party.

2- The party head has no authority to give a direction to the parliamentary party. He can only send a reference to disqualify him.

3- The SC judgement is also very clear, it mentions the parliamentary party, not political party with regards to the judgement.

It's same in both cases

At the time of PTI 158 PTI MPAs decided to vote for Pervez Ilahi while 25 voted against it.
Then those 158 members asked their party head Imran khan to file a reference in ECP for 25 member de seating which Imran khan did.

That's exactly what article 63-A says.
Parliamentary party majority will decide what to do inside assembly then if anyone disobey parliamentary party will ask party head to de seat him.

Here PMLQ parliamentary party decided to vote for Pervez ihali which is completely fine.

SC cannot overrule the constitution. Constitution says parliamentary leader

Supreme didn't in this case
This patwari is lying

 

[Goenitz]

Very sad day for me to see , such traitors killing Pakistan

PTI Won Punjab Election fair and square

It is disrespecting the people's voice


Election commissioner had deleted 40 Lakh Votes (marking people as Dead not living) in election claiming it was system error

PTI Should have won all seats

Now this

still its PP and Army

 

[Olympus81]

Bola tha PTI walo ko itna khush mat ho when PTI won by elections.

Nazar laga di BC.