What's new

Maryam Nawaz lashes out at Supreme Court judges

Bajra you get
158781.jpg
 
As Justice Owen Roberts of US SC famously said: the judgments and precedents of the Supreme Court should not be like train tickets - “good for this day and this train only”…

1658899088515.png


1658899273071.png


1658899295502.png


Three member SC bench’s explanation why it doesn’t have to follow own 8-member judgment in 2015 holding “decision of the party as to how to vote has been conferred upon the party head”:

1. Because other judges in 2015 case didn’t refer to this issue so we can ignore 8 judges who did refer.

2. Those 8 judges (including CJP Umar Ata Bandial) were saying something irrelevant to the case.

3. The observations of those 8 judges were made in ignorance of the law (per incurium)

4.They were just “passing remarks”

5. Even if CJP earlier “unconsciously” signed a judgment that was wrong, he can now correct his mistake. 6. In 2015 we didn’t treat Art 63-A as seriously as we now have. Thus instead of forming a Full Court to reconsider matter - we can just ignore our earlier finding.

Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain's lawyer in the Punjab Deputy Speaker Ruling Case Salahuddin Ahmed
 
Justice Ejaz Ul Ahsan got three plots allotted during IK government.


Maryam Nawaz and her bhagora father celebrating decisions given by supreme court and obviously same Justice Ejaz ul Ahsan



Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain's lawyer in the Punjab Deputy Speaker Ruling Case Salahuddin Ahmed

Chaudary Shujaat Hussain's lawyer was saying that Deputy Speaker ruling was wrong on the day of Punjab assembly voting


@Black.Mamba

Koi wapis aa gaya hai PDF par apni haram ki dehari laganai
 
Back
Top Bottom