What's new

CIA secret document: India need two weeks to occupy Bangladesh.

Times have changed now though, but not because of our military or otherwise, but because of the amount of people we have and the kind of people they are. :D
 
Bluesky,

With SHW in power, why do we need to occupy BD?

Regards
Well, SHW, your fat aunt bought many weapons systems and submarines from China. She refused an Indian weapons sales program to BD that could have given India a face. But, you keep on wishing for your great aunty SHW. Khaleda Zia will be a better and adoring aunty of yours, instead. At least she does not hide her feeling. But, SHW politely smiles at India while she buys China. Indians should trust this mask wearing woman.
 
Well, SHW, your fat aunt bought many weapons systems and submarines from China. She refused an Indian weapons sales program to BD that could have given India a face. But, you keep on wishing for your great aunty SHW. Khaleda Zia will be a better and adoring aunty of yours, instead. At least she does not hide her feeling. But, SHW politely smiles at India while she buys China. Indians should trust this mask wearing woman.
Khaleda is a more valuable Indian agent. Wrote letter to cancel BD's GSP facilities. During her time trade deficit with India increases...then she doesn't add electricity neither does infrastructure works....and actually retains a somewhat warm relation with India. I didn't pay much attention to politics back then in 2001-6. But I don't remember Bangladesh having a anything close to a Pakistan like relation with India. And her foreign policy is only limited to Pak and KSA......
 
@bluesky @Philia,

You are both wise people, especially the latter one, you can connect the dots. The truth is that you cant be a ruler of BD- SHW or BKZ without keeping India in good humour. In fact even you guys were to become PMs of BD, you wud have to toe the line.

Regards
 
@bluesky @Philia,

You are both wise people, especially the latter one, you can connect the dots. The truth is that you cant be a ruler of BD- SHW or BKZ without keeping India in good humour. In fact even you guys were to become PMs of BD, you wud have to toe the line.

Regards
There is nothing wrong with having a friendly relation with India. Good for BD and good for India as well. The problem is the relation is used too much in political arena. And we have a sizeable population who are pro India and a sizeable population who are anti India. Hasina targets pro India population in her speech, Khaleda targets anti India ones.

There was a military backed govt in BD from 2006-8. Anyone know their relationship with India? I don't know. Because they didn't talk about India neither they tried to use India for political gain. The relation was as usual. And the BD India relation remains 90% same no matter who is in power. Only 10% of it changes with govt. Hasina may give pro India statements and Khaleda(not she but her coalition partners) may make anti India comments but they relation mostly remains the same.
 
Philia,

You are the wonderful guy, a true example to all of us. Do forgive, if I have ever been disrespectful to you.

What you have said is true not only for BD-IND but for 80% of all international relations.

Regards
 
And what will India gain by taking BD?
160-170 million poor Muslim population?
They want to control BD. Which they are doing just fine. Their job is done in 1971
 
And what will India gain by taking BD?
160-170 million poor Muslim population?
They want to control BD. Which they are doing just fine. Their job is done in 1971
Greater control of Bay of Bengal. Greater control of the northeast region. Bigger land mass.
 
2.5 front war of India again?

India's West Bengal is actually a perfect buffer for Bongladeshi.

And 2 weeks or 2 days.

Pakistan will willingly help in distribution of the booty in the aftermath.
 
Back
Top Bottom