Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 618081
deino & west foreigners,
again it's our army and forum;
listen to chinese (not US media)
Oh come on ... grow up, get serious and stop talking like an Indian with all your hollow promises, announcements, and purported facts based only on "I heard, based on listening to Chinese".
Show facts or stay out of the discussions.
Again, I certainly don't hear everything, but I mostly listen to Chinese sources. And as long as members like
@LKJ86, @Beast, @lcloo or Huitong, Dafengcao, Oedosoldier and others agree with your facts, I don't believe a word of what only you tell; and I'm sure none of them believe you too.
I didn't say that.
PLAAF prefers J-10S and J-11BS.
Me too, I say J-7 relegate to training pilot but never claim it's good in training. In fact, J-7 can help pilot get used to some high G training but not a very good trainer in clocking enough flying hours for 4th gen modern fighter jets. L-15 will be best candidate. But it's not a very cheap trainer compare to J-7, J-9L.
First of all since most of them are plain wrong and stupid enough to mix the prototype J-11D with the AESA-upgraded J-11BG ... anyway, we will see, but again, this is the -10 thread and no the J-11 one.
...
There's J-11D prototype or it's just modified J-11BG for evaluation purpose?
You really need to do your homework... there were at least three J-11D prototypes before that project was terminated and the J-11BG is a regular MLU.
but again ... this is the wrong thread.
Then why did you say J-11D doesn't exist earlier? Things haven't finalized if China decided to build J-11D or all old J-11A/B being overhauled, refitted with new AESA, other avionics, new WS10 engines +TVC being redesignated J-11D. WS10G with 35,000lb thrust exist?