Then the entire Chinese Defense Forum, which goes gaga about rumors must be shut down
Rumor? Keep your eyes open.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then the entire Chinese Defense Forum, which goes gaga about rumors must be shut down
Rumor? Keep your eyes open.
Indeed, I'm the village idiot. Unlike you of course ;-). The whole point was about size and size is determined by what the ship is supposed to carry, which is in turn determined by what it is expected to be able to do, alone and in a group. That still has nothing to do with RCS. At no point have I suggested equivalence between ships of different sizes or that 055 does not have signature reduction features (and signature is more than just RCS). When you are done playing the donkey's behind, I 'l love to return to a civilized substantive discussion, rather than dealing with BS remarks that do not make this forum better. You have a nice day now.LOL, you have no idea what you are talking about do you? Check the size and dimension of a 7k ton ship vs a 12k ton ship (055). Btw, this ship is designed to reduce radar signature, what makes you think it is not reducing EM signature?
Which is why I asked "do you also predict stock?". Other than that, I'm not one for chest pounding.Nothing to do with luck.
An astute understanding of geopolitics
is needed to see what would happen.
GJB 5860-2006:24 cell HQ-10 for short range and it can also quad pack medium range missiles for defence up to around 70km.
why acting like a dump fellow.........So now you admit it's rumors? Wow, Indians install radome first? Gosh, you using illiterate dalits or something?
Dump fellowIf you have those radars ready, why do you still need to import? The answer is THEY ARE NOT READY.
seriously dumb fellowSo means you don't know. The burden of proof lies with the claimant. So is there or is there no working radar?
teri ammi ka balatkar kiya tha maine , tab too paida huaLoL, typical 3rd class Indian balatkari purush...
Read more at:This event at the culmination of Commanders’ Conference of South Western Air Command (SWAC) saw Air Marshal A K Gogoi accompanying the Air Chief. Officers from Air HQ and South Western Air Command (SWAC) as well as representatives of ELTA Systems Ltd, Israel, the Original Equipment Manufacturer of the radar were also present on the occasion.
why acting like a dump fellow.........
And what it has to do with dalits..........false flagger ...need chini flag to troll
Dump fellow
View attachment 407804View attachment 407806
seriously dumb fellow View attachment 407811 View attachment 407813 View attachment 407814View attachment 407816
Launched and operating are two different things altogether, you had been launching your IAC 3 times, you see it operating? And wtf is it doing on a surveillance ship and not a destroyer? Testing phase bhai? So it's back to the infamous DRDO testing loop again, the infinite loop that is.Our ocean surveillance ship is already launched, but the Hans can't even accept that it exists.
You are the one telling me 055 is a sitting duck when I explained to you that due to reduced radar signature design, dimensions do not matter. What exactly is your argument btw? First you say it's too big and then I explain to you missiles target by radar and hence it doesn't matter. Then now you tell me size has nothing to do with RCS...what are you trying to convey, there is no point writing an essay and not getting straight to the point.Indeed, I'm the village idiot. Unlike you of course ;-). The whole point was about size and size is determined by what the ship is supposed to carry, which is in turn determined by what it is expected to be able to do, alone and in a group. That still has nothing to do with RCS. At no point have I suggested equivalence between ships of different sizes or that 055 does not have signature reduction features (and signature is more than just RCS). When you are done playing the donkey's behind, I 'l love to return to a civilized substantive discussion, rather than dealing with BS remarks that do not make this forum better. You have a nice day now.
24 cell HQ-10 for short range and it can also quad pack medium range missiles for defence up to around 70km.
Can you debate the points that I have made rather than a personal attack?
Kindly quote the post where I have said 055 is a sitting duck. Oh wait, you can't.... because I didn't!You are the one telling me 055 is a sitting duck when I explained to you that due to reduced radar signature design, dimensions do not matter. What exactly is your argument btw? First you say it's too big and then I explain to you missiles target by radar and hence it doesn't matter. Then now you tell me size has nothing to do with RCS...what are you trying to convey, there is no point writing an essay and not getting straight to the point.
Read more at:
http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/arudhra-medium-power-radar-inducted-in-the-iaf/
LOL, an Israeli radar with an 'indigenous' Indian badge?
Btw, you mean to tell me an AESA radar can fit into a round radome as shown in your pic? LOL.
So which ship is operating this radar? You are showing me pictures after pictures, yet I ask one simple question, where is it 'operating'?
Launched and operating are two different things altogether
And wtf is it doing on a surveillance ship and not a destroyer?
Rumor? Keep your eyes open.
teri ammi ka balatkar kiya tha maine , tab too paida hua
He did open his eyes... the damage however, comes from the frontal lobe.
Ha the serial troll is here.
idiot, look up the date- 03 Jun , 2011
DRDO's Arudhra radar was inducted in 2016-17.
What sort of BS is this ?
None of those are naval radars. Those are the Arudhra, Ashwini & AEW&C AESA radars which has been inducted into IAF.
Sure, just like Type 055, still not operating.
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/these-are-the-little-known-ships-that-make-missile-defe-1594677657
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracking_ship
Kindly quote the post where I have said 055 is a sitting duck. Oh wait, you can't.... because I didn't!
Kindly quote the post where I have said 055 is too big. Oh wait, you can't.... because I didn't!
It is not my problem that you apparently are unable to read a simple post in plain English properly.
Now shoo!
The retorts was directed at this post "I'm not sure going back to battle cruisers is a great idea. I'd stick to sub 10k class destroyers. The offensive capabilities of today's AShM make these elephants sitting ducks."