This thread is totally absurd.
The O.P is frothing at the mouth and is unnecessarily asking for the mods for approval to post despite this being an open forum. What comrade Willian Hung is really asking for is immunity from deletion and censorship for shitty posts. In fact he is so condescending to the mods so as to suggest that his past posts were deleted not for being shitty and poor but rather that the mods are lacking in impartiality! Why should Hu Songshan even respond to this clown?
Relax buddy, it seems like you are getting too emotional with the way you used profanity and personal insults in your reply (or is this your deliberate tactic of trying to get this thread closed before it even get started??).
I asked Hu songshang for approval of this topic because my old posts on related topic was deleted in the past, sometime with no reasons given and sometime with the reason “off-topic” posts. So of course I would need to now create a new thread specifically for this topic and asked mod if the topic is OK. No where did I asked mod to give me immunity from moderation, this is your own fabrication. Any infringements can be given infraction as per normal forum rules just like in all other threads. As long as the topic I asked for is approved, I will post normally in a civilized manner within forum rules, supporting my arguments with proper sources. And you and other Chinese members are welcomed to debate/dispute me, staying within normal forum rules.
It seems like you are now trying to back out from your previous challenge?
On another note, why is a new thread even created? What happened to the original thread and my post that aparently got William Hung on a rabid bush meat hunting spree?
This just proves why I needed to start a new thread for this specific topic. I got banned from that thread for “off-topic”, in replying to your first post.
The post I made was about American use of agent orange and napalm. About the destruction of the city of Hue. About the starvation caused by France and Japan leading to millions of deaths in Vietnam. What has this to do about Chinese betrayal of Vietnam?
Even with his derailment of the subject at hand, lets humor this clown and hear his grievances which he is so keen to put forward and even created a thread for. Perhaps we can even learn something from what he has to say if the quality isnt so bad like his past posts deleted by the mods.
Oh why have you suddenly changed your rhetorics completely? In that thread, the specific issue of China’s betrayal and secret dealings was already mentioned by me and
you even challenged me post on it. Why have you changed your rhetorics completely and now act as though this topic is completely new and wasn’t mentioned in that thread??
You talked about how China helped VN and why VN have turned against China instead of turning against the US who had bombed VN with Agent Orange, Napalm, etc. (btw that thread
had nothing to do with the US but you still made that offtopic flamebait anyway, yet now trying to paint yourself innocent), anyway so I disputed your post and said it was China who had turned its back against VN, it was China who had previous secret dealings with the US/JP and back stabbed VN. Then
you challenged me to post about it. So why have you made a 180 degree turn now?
Reading your post, it seems like you are now trying to back away from your challenge that you’ve made in that VN-JMSDF thread (mods are free to check the deleted posts to confirm that).
So I will still wait for @Hu songshang to approve or reply and then we can discuss more in depth in a civilized manner. Thanks.
@William Hung : to avoid digging deep into separation. Let try to make Q&A style definition to make clear anything you think that's derailment by some extremists.
You mean to make clear what would be considered as a derailment in this thread?
Well the specific topic for this thread is about the relationships, dealings and secret dealings of VN and China, who betrayed who, etc. Anything else should be considered as offtopic.
Forum rules would be just the same as usual, no personal insults, no offtopic, etc.
I think this is all normal.
Vietnam is not meant to be trusted but to be used and to be disposed when it served no purpose, that is the really of South Asia geopolitics situations at that time: a simple fact it's that US was willing to betray South Vietnam by negotiate with Communist China for an exit. And after Soviet collapse, your formal Ally, Russia is willing to cooperate with China in the struggle against US, did Vietnam get Russia support for SCS?? and Ironically a hopeless and helpless Vietnam is cozying with US (the formal invader) against China...Vietnam is not only been betrayed but betray itself....LMAO just too funny.
Thanks for writing your views. I will address them properly once this topic is approved.
Let's go!
