China's Blitzkrieg on U.S. Carrier

[amalakas]

If I were you J-20BlackDragon, I would ignore these trolls.

Speaking for myself, I spend my valuable time at the gym working out or improving my YouTube video-creation skills.

Arguing with these irrational anti-China haters is a waste of time and these guys are here all the time. It's not productive.

1. The ethnic Vietnamese is unhappy. His country is stuck in the Third World and he unloads his anger on China.

2. The Greek guy's country is in the toilet and he's unloading his anger on China.

3. The Indian guys' country is collapsing, where electricity is sometimes unavailable in the majority of the country. They unleash their anger on China.

The common denominator is jealousy. China is a competently managed country and it's constantly improving. Vietnam, Greece, and India are all moving in the opposite direction with collapsing currencies.

Hence, most of us happy Chinese ignore these losers. Just my two cents.

And of course all you mentioned affects our intelligence and that is why we miss your amazing points !!!!!

anything you want to add on reputable sources Martian ?

Isn't it obvious? China's DF-21D ASBM is strictly a defensive weapon that is useful in a band around 2,000km from China's shores.

China is switching from strategic defense to offense. Down the road, China wants to park an aircraft carrier battle group off another country's shores.

and what if the other country has similar weapons ? .. pure gold

 

[Martian2]

And of course all you mentioned affects our intelligence and that is why we miss your amazing points !!!!!

anything you want to add on reputable sources Martian ?

and what if the other country has similar weapons ? .. pure gold

I'm not thinking about the U.S.

I'm thinking China is pondering putting pressure on other countries following America's style of diplomacy.

----------

Sure, here are some reputable sources.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/where-dong-weak-gold-rules-vietnam-they-will-pay-you-store-your-gold

"Apr 11, 2012 – The unfortunately named Vietnamese dong has been devalued to the point where it now has an absurd number of zeros. Over the past 3 years it has lost some 30% of its value against the US dollar– it now takes about 21,000 dong to buy just one US dollar."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/47547122/Greece_to_Exit_Euro_New_Currency_to_Fall_60_Citi

"May 24, 2012 – Greece will leave the euro zone next year and the country's new currency will "immediately fall by 60 percent," according to Citi chief economist ..."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-500395_162-57451244/greece-sees-borrowing-costs-jump/

"Jun 12, 2012 – Country raised $2B but at a relatively hefty interest rate that rose from a similar debt sale last month."

http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/08/02/india-telecoms-credit-idINL2E8J29KZ20120802

"Reuters-Aug 2, 2012
Aug 2 (IFR) - A light is shining at the end of the tunnel for Indian ... and the rupee's 25% fall against the US dollar in the past 12 months has left it ..."

 

[amalakas]

I'm not thinking about the U.S.

I'm thinking China is pondering putting pressure on other countries a la American style.

I know what you mean, and of course the idea of the US/Russia arming these countries with comparable weapons hasn't crossed your mind ?

 

[j20blackdragon]

China's nuclear buildup is nonstop!

I dare someone to do something.

Are you all talk and no action?

The nation has 13 generators in commercial operation while 28 are being built, the Ministry of Environmental Protection said in June. China may have more than 100 atomic reactors by 2020, it said.

China Connects First Fast Nuclear Reactor to Electricity Grid - Bloomberg

China has ambitious plans to have more than 100 reactors operating by 2020 to help curb surging demand for coal and imported oil and gas. But development was suspended after Japan's March 2011 tsunami crippled the Fukushima power plant, causing the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986.

Authorities launched an inspection of China's 13 operating reactors following the Fukushima disaster and said they found no problems. They said they were reviewing work on the 28 reactors under construction.

China nuclear company plans IPO to fund expansion

 

[amalakas]

China's nuclear buildup is nonstop!

I dare someone to do something.

Are you all talk and no action?



China Connects First Fast Nuclear Reactor to Electricity Grid - Bloomberg



China nuclear company plans IPO to fund expansion

again, what is with all the photos ?

 

[j20blackdragon]

again, what is with all the photos ?

Calm down buddy!

 

[amalakas]

Calm down buddy!

I am really trying to see why you post the same over and over again. Especially the ones from parades .. what are they suppose to prove ..really!

 

[gambit]

If I were you J-20BlackDragon, I would ignore these trolls.

Speaking for myself, I spend my valuable time at the gym working out or improving my YouTube video-creation skills.

Arguing with these irrational anti-China haters is a waste of time and these guys are here all the time. It's not productive.

1. The ethnic Vietnamese is unhappy. His country is stuck in the Third World and he unloads his anger on China.

2. The Greek guy's country is in the toilet and he's unloading his anger on China.

3. The Indian guys' country is collapsing, where electricity is sometimes unavailable in the majority of the country. They unleash their anger on China.

The common denominator is jealousy. China is a competently managed country and it's constantly improving. Vietnam, Greece, and India are all moving in the opposite direction with collapsing currencies.

Hence, most of us happy Chinese ignore these losers. Just my two cents.

And coming from a Chinese whose loyalty is confused and who have no military experience in this matter, that is about how much your comments are worth -- in total.

 

[j20blackdragon]

North Korea sunk the Cheonan in 2010.

The US didn't do anything.

All talk and no action!

ROKS Cheonan sinking - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Martian2]

I know what you mean, and of course the idea of the US/Russia arming these countries with comparable weapons hasn't crossed your mind ?

Come on. You sound like those Vietnamese retards.

Russia sells six Kilo submarines to Vietnam. So what?

1. No Kilo submarine has been delivered.

2. Vietnamese has no experience operating submarines. China has been operating submarines for 50 years.

3. China has 71 submarines and it is constantly building more.

4. China can attack other countries by land or with its 4,000km DH-10 cruise missile.

5. China can use its powerful PLA Air Force to destroy future Vietnamese bases.

6. Chinese AESA radars have far greater range than crappy Third World countries around its periphery.

7. Aside from the U.S., only China is perfecting its true fifth-generation stealth fighter. Don't mention the T-50/Pak-Fa with its exposed metal engines.

8. China can easily replace any of its military losses by manufacturing more weapons. India, Vietnam, and others cannot.

In conclusion, selling an insignificant amount of weaponry to countries that have no experience in using them makes no difference to China. Duh!

----------

Dear Gambit,

History has shown that McCarthyism does not equate to patriotism. In fact, history has proved that McCarthyism is a betrayal of the fundamental American values of fairness and freedom from a political witch hunt.

I am merely an armchair general exercising my constitutional right to discuss potential military scenarios. There is nothing patriotic or unpatriotic in my behavior. I'm pursuing my hobby, just like you.

However, unlike you, I don't take cheap shots at your patriotism or other personal issues. It's called respecting others.

Sincerely,

Armchair General Martin

 

[UKBengali]

We did. Too bad China's radars are too sh1tty to detect them. But then again, we flew them from CONUS to Yugoslavia and the Russian-supplied radars could not detect them as well.


Only to the Chinese here that it does not matter. Like I said, I really do hope that the PLA's leadership thinks like you do.

Too bad the Russian radars were not the most advanced.

China's radar technology is approaching cutting edge and the Chinese have 4th generation fighters and AWACs that the Serbians lacked.

Your point proves nothing.

US B-2s won't ever make it back from bombing runs on China.

:

 

[amalakas]

Come on. You sound like those Vietnamese retards.

Russia sells six Kilo submarines to Vietnam. So what?

1. No Kilo submarine has been delivered.

2. Vietnamese has no experience operating submarines. China has been operating submarines for 50 years.

3. China has 71 submarines and it is constantly building more.

4. China can attack other countries by land or with its 4,000km DH-10 cruise missile.

5. China can use its powerful PLA Air Force to destroy future Vietnamese bases.

6. Chinese AESA radars have far greater range than crappy Third World countries around its periphery.

7. Aside from the U.S., only China is perfecting its true fifth-generation stealth fighter. Don't mention the T-50/Pak-Fa with its exposed metal engines.

8. China can easily replace any of its military losses by manufacturing more weapons. India, Vietnam, and others cannot.

In conclusion, selling an insignificant amount of weaponry to countries that have no experience in using them makes no difference to China. Duh!

----------

Dear Gambit,

History has shown that McCarthyism does not equate to patriotism. In fact, history has proved that McCarthyism is a betrayal of the fundamental American values of fairness and freedom from a political witch hunt.

I am merely an armchair general exercising my constitutional right to discuss potential military scenarios. There is nothing patriotic or unpatriotic in my behavior. I'm pursuing my hobby, just like you.

However, unlike you, I don't take cheap shots at your patriotism or other personal issues. It's called respecting others.

Sincerely,

Armchair General Martin

you are still using the same old arguments aren't you ?

and when I said sources, I didn't mean sources for your current post, you missed the sarcasm

 

[j20blackdragon]

Too bad the Russian radars were not the most advanced.

China's radar technology is approaching cutting edge and the Chinese have 4th generation fighters and AWACs that the Serbians lacked.

Your point proves nothing.

US B-2s won't ever make it back from bombing runs on China.

:

Exactly.

He thinks B-2s can fly unescorted into China with no air superiority and open those bomb bays without being detected.

I say go ahead and do it.

What's stopping the US from doing it right now?

 

[amalakas]

Exactly.

He thinks B-2s can fly unescorted into China with no air superiority and open those bomb bays without being detected.

I say go ahead and do it.

What's stopping the US from doing it right now?

It is called foreign policy, and yes not only B-2s but also even the retired F-117s could fly in and out of Chinese airspace and noone would even know.

Not to mention that right now the combined conventional might of the PLN cannot deal with a single US CBG.

some people think I exaggerate, but I am not.

 

[j20blackdragon]

and yes not only B-2s but also even the retired F-117s could fly in and out of Chinese airspace and noone would even know.

What is the combat radius of the F-117 and from which airbase is it operating from?