What's new

China will ‘exhaust all means’ to lure global talent, despite push for tech self-sufficiency, Xi Jinping says

Will that still be China or will we be putting up extraterritorial colonial bubble where foreigners reign over Chinese yet again?

Even Qing dynasty had to be beaten down for decades to accept extraterritoriality, and now we do it for free? What is this but self enslavement?
Completely different because China today is a superpower and has complete jurisdiction. There are tons of Chinese in Vancouver and tons of Arabs in Dearborn, would you say that Canada and the US are colonies? No. It’s time for china to rid itself from this inferiority complex derived from the Qing empire. China needs to think more like the Tang Dynasty when it was a great cosmopolitan country.
We're an immigrant country after all. Multiculturalism and immigration is part of Singapore's DNA, although it's easier if you're ethnic Chinese since we want to maintain the current racial balance.

And it's all kinds of talents we're looking out for, with the drive and the grit. Not just scientists, techies or bankers.

37:47

@vi-va
Singapore’s curse is that it is such a small country, just a city state. If it had much more territory, it’d probably be among the top five most powerful countries in the world.
 
.
Singapore’s curse is that it is such a small country, just a city state. If it had much more territory, it’d probably be among the top five most powerful countries in the world.

Singepore top 5 most strongest countries? come on dude lets get real? Lets just give Singepore entire territory of Malaysia just as an example and hack including it's all populations? Do you think Singepore becomes top 5 powerful country in the world? Lets say 50 million population okay? Germany is 80 million today and former great power and doesn't even make top 15 today what makes you think Singepore will make top 5?
 
.
The signals given over the past two years have been very, very, very discouraging.

Real openness and faith to the agreed contracts, or lack thereof, are manifested at the times of crisis.

China has failed on that front.
To be fair however, I think China sees the covid crisis as a biowarfare attack and a political program to initiate global hostilities against China. So China is responding by going into war footing, which is not illogical given the circumstances. Hopefully tensions will subside soon but I’m not that hopeful.
Singepore top 5 most strongest countries? come on dude? Lets just give Singepore to entire territory of Malaysia and hack including it's all populations? Do you think Singepore becomes top 5 powerful country in the world? Lets say 50 million population okay? Get real germany is 80 million today and former greater power and doesn't even make top 15 today
I think if Singapore was the size of maybe France and had 90 million people at least, it could be among the top five. Germany would be among the top five if it was truly independent. But it’s basically a vassal state of the US and it was neutered after ww2.
I think they were influenced by Malaysia and Indonesia who were globalists for nearly a millennium... This is what have influenced the Chinese descandants across that region in SEA because sometimes you become that culture you live amongst.

The reason Malaysia and Indonesia became globalists were due to Islam it promotes only globalism this is it's core identity since the eras of the Malacca Sultanate, Darussalam Sultanate and Aceh Sultanate. Humanity is viewed from one big glass both converts and non-converts are viewed as fellow human-being. Hence the racial undertone is cut to a minimum including it forbids racism. Globalism is very underrated tool and one of the single major reason the Islamic civilization was the dominant world hegemony power twice in a expanded time of over a millennium. It all came down to globalism if they were not globalists it would have died down immediately as an Arab uprising period and history books would have forgotten about them but they learned how to adapt and evolve like a symbiote which grants greater longivity that tool is called globalism. This was fundamental for the Islamic civilization and also being a globalist makes you world class and everything you do is world-class because you are interlinked with many culture in the same time interconnected you are preforming at an international arena.

The Americans are also globalists and currently the poster-boys for globalism.

The sole reason the US has also come to world hegemony since WW2 comes down to globalism because they are globalists at heart and this is their most important treat and strongest it is easier to undo an islationist ethnic group but not a globalist civilization like the western world is currently.
I think the Chinese in SEA definitely are influenced from being in multicultural societies. Most SEA Chinese are very cosmopolitan and sophisticated in mindset. Comparing them to many mainland Chinese, especially those in the hinterlands, is like comparing a Swiss banker to some Oklahoma farm boy tbh.

In Singapore’s case however, it’s structure was largely built by the British, who established it as an international port and a multicultural society. The Chinese in Singapore inherited this structure but turned a third world port into a global financial center, amongst the richest in the world.
 
Last edited:
.
Completely different because China today is a superpower and has complete jurisdiction. There are tons of Chinese in Vancouver and tons of Arabs in Dearborn, would you say that Canada and the US are colonies? No. It’s time for china to rid itself from this inferiority complex derived from the Qing empire. China needs to think more like the Tang Dynasty when it was a great cosmopolitan country.

Do you know An Lushan?
 
. .
I think if Singapore was the size of maybe France and had 90 million people at least, it could be among the top five. Germany would be among the top five if it was truly independent. But it’s basically a vassal state of the US and it was neutered after ww2.

In that scenario definitely possible with couple of nukes it would not only be possibility but a reality... France is not a vessal to Germany extent but still not top 5 but on the singepore angle I agree
 
.
Completely different because China today is a superpower and has complete jurisdiction. There are tons of Chinese in Vancouver and tons of Arabs in Dearborn, would you say that Canada and the US are colonies? No. It’s time for china to rid itself from this inferiority complex derived from the Qing empire. China needs to think more like the Tang Dynasty when it was a great cosmopolitan country.

Singapore’s curse is that it is such a small country, just a city state. If it had much more territory, it’d probably be among the top five most powerful countries in the world.

Well, I'm flattered but Singapore would have her own set of different problems if she were larger. Being small and vulnerable is what keeps us ideology free and pragmatic.
 
.
Well, I'm flattered but Singapore would have her own set of different problems if she were larger. Being small and vulnerable is what keeps us ideology free and pragmatic.
I think if Singapore had the same makeup but was larger, it’d definitely be among the great powers.
 
.
It's going to require a major rewire of its society and I don't think it is anywhere near that yet. In fact, I think the only Asian society that is remotely successful in doing that is Singapore, and that is because it was a British colony, has English as its lingua franca and is already racially diverse. China is way too insular to be like Singapore. The best I think it can do within the next 20 years is to maybe set up certain zones in big cities like Shenzhen, Shanghai, Beijing etc. where large expat bubbles can be encouraged to thrive/exist and English is set up as an informal second language everywhere in order to at least create certain bubbles where foreigners would feel very comfortable, at least enough to settle down in those areas long term.

I think its easier than lot of people imagine. First thing is stop chasing whites only or chinese ethnicity only. There is humongous talent in south asia and africa. Thanks to dysfunctional governance there the top talent migrates abroad as opposed to west where top talent tends to remain there. Chinese companies already have research centers in india for example. its pretty east to extend them to staffing companies and source talent from there.

Let corporates run the show and govt must target a quota like say 50k per year. Requirements shouldnt be too strict. A grad who can get a job in chinese tech compant is sufficient. They will create a massive earning for china over their lifetime.

And anyone who thinks this will lead to mass immigration needs to have their head examined. At 50k it will take 200 years to reach even one percent of population.
It's going to require a major rewire of its society and I don't think it is anywhere near that yet. In fact, I think the only Asian society that is remotely successful in doing that is Singapore, and that is because it was a British colony, has English as its lingua franca and is already racially diverse. China is way too insular to be like Singapore. The best I think it can do within the next 20 years is to maybe set up certain zones in big cities like Shenzhen, Shanghai, Beijing etc. where large expat bubbles can be encouraged to thrive/exist and English is set up as an informal second language everywhere in order to at least create certain bubbles where foreigners would feel very comfortable, at least enough to settle down in those areas long term.

I think its easier than lot of people imagine. First thing is stop chasing whites only or chinese ethnicity only. There is humongous talent in south asia and africa. Thanks to dysfunctional governance there the top talent migrates abroad as opposed to west where top talent tends to remain there. Chinese companies already have research centers in india for example. its pretty east to extend them to staffing companies and source talent from there.

Let corporates run the show and govt must target a quota like say 50k per year. Requirements shouldnt be too strict. A grad who can get a job in chinese tech compant is sufficient. They will create a massive earning for china over their lifetime.

And anyone who thinks this will lead to mass immigration needs to have their head examined. At 50k it will take 200 years to reach even one percent of population.
 
.
I think its easier than lot of people imagine. First thing is stop chasing whites only or chinese ethnicity only. There is humongous talent in south asia and africa. Thanks to dysfunctional governance there the top talent migrates abroad as opposed to west where top talent tends to remain there. Chinese companies already have research centers in india for example. its pretty east to extend them to staffing companies and source talent from there.

Let corporates run the show and govt must target a quota like say 50k per year. Requirements shouldnt be too strict. A grad who can get a job in chinese tech compant is sufficient. They will create a massive earning for china over their lifetime.

And anyone who thinks this will lead to mass immigration needs to have their head examined. At 50k it will take 200 years to reach even one percent of population.

No, I agree. I think China should definitely chase talent from all over the world. I think it is already doing so as it provides scholarships for tens of thousands of students from the global south. But retaining those talents is another thing and China needs to really improve on that. By making permanent residency easier, by making the culture more welcoming and providing a more cosmopolitan atmosphere, these will go a long way.
 
.
The PAP government has antagonist 2 generations of young people for a long time that now IPS (think thank) is sounding alarm. It is not as if the old love PAP so much. But rather, the 2012 election deliver such a blow to PAP that she rowed out quasi free basic healthcare for the old.

Without this PAP could have lose power now. This bought PAP some time but she has squandered the last 8 years moving too slowly to solve the concern of young people.

The young grow up under employed and unemployed, while PAP keep publishing news that wage is rising and job is abundant.

It is very difficult to find young people supporting PAP nowadays. These young people got their whole life destroyed by PAP.

PAP time is numbered.

You cannot explain why entire GLCs are full of stupid foreigners practicing caste system. This government is treacherous.
 
.

China is calling for more global talent to bolster technological innovation and national power, amid growing concern from foreign investors that Beijing’s “dual-circulation” strategy might turn it further inward and hamper international collaboration.

China will “exhaust all means” to recruit intelligent and innovative professionals from around the world, President Xi Jinping said in a speech to a key national talent work conference in September.

The transcript, published on Thursday on Qiushi, a state journal covering the Chinese Communist Party’s governing philosophy, laid out a specific timetable for China to become a world power in science and technology within two decades.

“The emphasis on independent cultivation of talent must not mean self-isolation,” Xi said.

“China needs participation of global talent, while its development also provides opportunities for global talent.”


Xi said China must implement more proactive policies to lure top professionals, which are in short supply, and form a “talent system with global appeal and competitive advantage”.

With generous funding and high-level jobs, China has long been seeking scientists from abroad, including from Japan.

In September, Dr Akira Fujishima, a chemist and the “father of photocatalysis”, joined the University of Shanghai for Science and Technology. The university and Shanghai government will make a multimillion yuan investment to set up a research institute for his team.

Dr Mikoshiba Katsuhiko joined ShanghaiTech University in 2019 to continue his research in molecular neurobiology.

Shuai Ke, previously a tenured professor of biological chemistry at UCLA, also joined Nanjing University in July as the tech rivalry between China and the United States deepened.

Xi’s speech was made amid growing concern that China’s “dual circulation” strategy, which focuses more on domestic consumption and aims to boost self-sufficiency in hi-tech manufacturing, may squeeze participation of foreign companies and expertise.

China’s harsh border restrictions prompted by the coronavirus pandemic have been sharply criticised by international business groups and have increased the risk of losing foreign experts, potentially deepening its talent problem.

Xi also stressed the importance of clearing institutional and bureaucratic barriers to build a system that cultivates and incentivises talent.

China will build an army of young tech professionals, who are at the moment hindered by limited leadership and promotion opportunities, as well as general living pressure, Xi said.

“Studies show that age 25 to 45 is the best time for scientists to invent and create, but a lot of talented young people are investing too much energy into academic title evaluations and project applications, while facing many practical difficulties such as housing and children’s admissions to schools. The focal point for cultivating strategic talent should be placed on technology,” Xi said.

Special policies and flexible measures should be provided to people with skills, and “failures should be permitted and forgiven”, he said.

Support to develop tech talent was also stressed during the central economic work conference last Friday, which included drafting a decade-long agenda to conduct fundamental research, reorganising major science labs across the country and continuing international cooperation on technology.

A host of foreign workers with European companies operating in China remain stranded outside the country due to travel restrictions, according to a report published earlier this year by the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China.

The top talent in US, Canada, Australia, EU etc. are all Chinese expats. China just need to bring back all expats Chinese and prohibit Chinese going overseas.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom