The sad part of the Chinese, is that they prove Mao is right about the Chinese, when he called them 'frogs in the well'.
That is precisely why China moved away from his ideology and is doing so well today. People today actually considers Deng Xiaoping a better political figure than Mao.
This puts the last nail into the Mao dynasty for you. You need to stop missing the woods of the forrest and embarrass yourself further like that. Times have changed my dear guru friend.
Where has anyone denied that Maoists are locked up in Jail. And it does not require the international media to bring it to the notice. The Indian media is active to bring such issues up. In China, the media is state controlled and so everything is under the carpet, till the international media unearths it!!
The point here isn't the denial of Maoist getting locked up or not. But the fact that they are locked up. By your logics of how Weiwei shouldn't have been imprisoned, then the honorable gentleman 'Dr. Binayak Sen' should not have been imprisoned too. Where was his crime? why was he awarded the prestigious Jonathan Mann Award for Global Health and Human Rights in 2008? and why did international media show much concern for his imprisonment and is pressing for his release?
The Indian media is active enough to bring such issues up but its government is defying the will of the people and as said before by myself. Are you too coward to admit that your 'democracy' of the 'free world' is a system so fair that it doesn't be sweep its minority underneath the carpet?
The other difference between China and India is that in India, the Maoists are brought to the court and international people are allowed to attend the proceedings as also the local people and even the Maoist.
Your statement failed to show that in India it is ok to associate someone with Maoist and then placing them under false imprisonment? There is also no stopping the minority from being swept underneath the carpet. Mind you Dr. Binayak Sen was fortunate enough to be under international media spotlight. Just imagine the not so fortunate ones out of the 1.2billion+ population.
And what is more, it is only when the court sentence is heard would a person be taken to be guilty.
This is a perfect demonstration of how the 'democratic' society of the 'free world' India and the 'communist' society of China are linked. The only difference in China is we execute them when thhey are found guilty to ease their suffering and to prevent the waste of tax payers money. In India they prefer to bring them back into lengthy trials, or take them in again after release for further trivial and falsely accused crime and have them remain in prison indefinitely at the expense of the tax payers money.
Further, the Indian media runs articles, some favouring these Maoists and none can stop them. In China is zero.
Further, having media run articles is one thing. Seeing a change in govenment actions is another? it doesn't stop the 'democratic' society of the 'free world' from sweeping the minority underneath the carpet does it?
In India, politicians like Swami Agnivesh and others carry out agitation on behalf of the Maoist. In China, none dare to speak up for dissidents.
I was told one time that in India they say 'we have freedom of speech, but we have no freedom after speech'. Is that true?
In short, in India, there are avenues for justice.
Yes and in China they have 110,000 Lawyers and over 9,000 law offices. They are there to paint their toe nails and pick their noses for money?
In China, you are dead meat without any proper trial.
In India, you become the liability of tax payers regardless of the outcomes of trials. Heck they have a system where people like Swami Agnivesh are allowed to have links but throw someone like Dr. Binayak Sen into prison for having same links? Oh where art thou irony..