What's new

China seething after India issues visa to Uyghur ‘terrorist’

Indians have two set of ethics...one for themselves..one for others..When china reacted to Indian move for banning masood azhar..it was reaction to indian support of dalai lama..
you can be a cheerleader, but don't be ignorent .if you don't know the difference between these two men please don't insult Dalai lama.

post reported
 
Indians have two set of ethics...one for themselves..one for others..When china reacted to Indian move for banning masood azhar..it was reaction to indian support of dalai lama..

flash1412103061.jpg


A terrorist with the Nobel Peace prize. I believe Masood Azhar is next in line for consideration.
 
WUC is an seperatists group, they use jihad as a inspire to do suicidal attack. Seperatists/ jihad/ terrorists. India can't be trusted, too much vengeance. Wtf if China ask India to ban Dalai Lama if not we invite Maoist visit China and having a meeting? Why the hell we need to do what Indians tell us, who they think they are?

得寸进尺

Well, you can go to UN and ban this outfit internationally. China's internal matter is irrelevant for us.
 
As they say, 'silent genocide'.

False, genocide and cultural genocide claims are exaggerated lies.The word genocide is thrown around so liberally these days. The population for the Uighurs has grown to 8 million from a small half a million/million, in 1949 a general suggested on exterminating the Uighurs but Mao rejected it, if we wanted to finish them off an actual genocide it would have been done long ago.The Uighurs are simply following all other ethnic groups that have assimilated into Chinese society. Some don't like it they either resort terrorism or separatism campaign which has pretty much failed. You integrate into the more advanced society or end up like Europe with its immigrant problems. But hey believe whatever you want.
 
Well, you can go to UN and ban this outfit internationally. China's internal matter is irrelevant for us.
Don't ask China to ban Azhar, we don't care how Indians suffer. Azhar is the problem between India and Pakistan, why you get China in this shit? Next time you may plead to ban China in the UN.

False, genocide and cultural genocide claims are exaggerated lies, the word genocide is thrown around so liberally these days. The Uighurs are simply following all other ethnic groups that have assimilated into Chinese society. Some don't like it they either resort terrorism or separatism campaign which has pretty much failed. But hey believe whatever you want.
The looking is different, hard to assimilated. The Uhighers are not encouraged to marry Hans. The problem is that 99.9% of Uhigers are ok with PRC, few people try to get independent through Jihad.
 
Don't ask China to ban Azhar, we don't care how Indians suffer.
We did not ask China to ban him. we are asking why china blocked it. 14 countries would have voted yes out of 15. China could has kept out of it .
even if you don't care about how Indians suffer,we Indians will care how Chinese suffer which we Indians don't want.
 
Don't ask China to ban Azhar, we don't care how Indians suffer. Azhar is the problem between India and Pakistan, why you get China in this shit? Next time you may plead to ban China in the UN.

China fired the first shot by vetoing the proposition in UN, this is retaliation. We will hit where it will hurt the most for China. SCS will be the next playground.
 
India is a well known terrorists supporter all the way from Supporting mukhti bani,LTTE,BLA,TTP,kashmir,ISIS and now this

But wonder of wonders it's always Pakistan which is mentioned with terrorism. Tough No. :-)

China blames India for hosting its terrorist
The spat between India and China over blocking sanctions on Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Masood Azhar may further widen with Beijing declaring its expectation from India, which involves "bringing to justice" a Chinese Uyghur exile - who has been invited to India next week - deemed a "terrorist" by Beijing.

Ananth Krishnan | Posted by Anand Jayaram
Beijing, April 22, 2016 | UPDATED 09:08 IST
A +A -
china-2,-rana-95_647_042216090743.jpg

The spat between India and China over blocking sanctions on Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Masood Azhar may further widen with Beijing declaring its expectation from India, which involves "bringing to justice" a Chinese Uyghur exile - who has been invited to India next week - deemed a "terrorist" by Beijing.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry told Mail Today in a statement that Dolkun Isa, a leader of the exiled group World Uyghur Congress (WUC), who is among several Chinese exiles and dissidents invited to take part in an April 28 conference in Dharamsala, was "a terrorist" and that it was "a due obligation" of all countries to "bring him to justice".

This follows reports that India has issued a visa for Isa to enable him to attend the conference, which is being organised by a United States-based organisation called Initiatives for China. It is a pro-democracy group, whose president Yang Jianli was among the student protesters at Tiananmen Square in 1989. The meeting is expected to bring together Uyghurs, Tibetans and other dissidents and exiles, under the theme of discussing democratic transformation in China.

The visit of the Uyghur exile is set to create fresh strains in wake of both the sides already grappling with the Masood Azhar issue. While Dolkun Isa has not yet confirmed his attendance, reports in India say that he has been issued a visa.

This move can in no way be supported by Beijing, which has called on countries to arrest Isa and has blamed him for organising terrorist activities in the Muslim-majority western Xinjiang region, home to the Uyghurs, who are one of the 55 minorities in China.

Isa was in 2009 barred from entering South Korea after appearing on a terrorist blacklist. At the time, Chinese State media reports said he was wanted by the Ministry of Public Security for bombings in Toksu, in Xinjiang, in the 1990s. Isa left China in 1997 and was granted asylum in Germany, where he has been living ever since.

China has accused Isa's World Uyghur Congress for fomenting violence in Xinjiang, most notably in 2009, when mass riots claimed at least 197 lives. The WUC has rejected the charges, saying it is working to highlight repression faced by Uyghur minorities.

On the Dharamsala meeting, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson in Beijing said in the statement to Mail Today, "I am not aware of the situation". The statement added: "What I want to point out is that Dolkun Isa is a terrorist on the red notice of Interpol and the Chinese police. Bringing him to justice is a due obligation of relevant countries".

This comes in the wake of National Security Adviser Ajit Doval's talks in Beijing on the Azhar issue, with both sides taking up the discussion on how to better align their counter-terrorism strategies amid recent differences

Doval told Mail Today on Thursday - before departing for New Delhi - both sides spoke on counter-terrorism and other common strategic issues in the 19th round of border talks. The Azhar issue figured as part of those discussions on counter-terror. Doval raising the issue has underlined India's strong stand on China's move at the UN 1267 sanctions committee to place a technical hold on its application to list Azhar. External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj hit out at the "double standards" on terrorism at Monday's Russia-India-China meeting in Moscow and also expressed India's strong concerns to her Chinese counterpart Wang Yi. Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar, who was also in Beijing, had raised the issue in the meetings with the PLA leadership.

On Thursday, Doval met with Chinese Premier Li Keqiang at the Zhongnanhai central leadership compound in Beijing, where the Communist Party leadership usually hosts top visiting leaders. He said that India was looking forward to President Pranab Mukherjee visit to China next month. This would be his maiden visit to China as President.http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/...india-invites-chinese-terrorist/1/648658.html

It's time we come out in support of Tibet and say Tibet is not a part of China.
What about arming the Viet's with Brahmos. Where are we on that front.
 
if tomorrow China goes to UN to get this guy and organisation declared as terrorists ,and if some country blocks it, is it fault of the one who blocked it or is it chinas fault by dragging the other country into it by taking it to UN.
the simple truth is China helped the terrorist by blocking it.
You are talking to a country who is P5. We have veto power, that's it. Cause our relationship is not good, and the problem is get Pakistan invloved, so we won't ban him. As reference to the continuous India's shield of China's dissidents, PRC won't respond to India's request. Although India might revenge by inviting Uyghers terrorists, it won't able to make the ban proposal through the UN resolution without China agreement. China has the upper hands.
 
WUC is an seperatists group, they use jihad as a inspire to do suicidal attack. Seperatists/ jihad/ terrorists. India can't be trusted, too much vengeance. Wtf if China ask India to ban Dalai Lama if not we invite Maoist visit China and having a meeting? Why the hell we need to do what Indians tell us, who they think they are?

得寸进尺

And JeM to which Masood Azhar belongs, the guy China is trying to protect, is a UN declared terrorist organisation!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaish-e-Mohammed

You are more than welcome to invite the Maoists, it will help us nab them :lol:
 
China fired the first shot by vetoing the proposition in UN, this is retaliation. We will hit where it will hurt the most for China. SCS will be the next playground.
Retaliate China for a stuff not related to us? Senseless. Provide Proof that Azhar is related to Taliban and Alqaeda, he will banned automatically in UN. The way you are pushing this is called playing rogue. Childish play.
 
You are talking to a country who is P5. We have veto power, that's it. Cause our relationship is not good, and the problem is get Pakistan invloved, so we won't ban him. As reference to the continuous India's shield of China's dissidents, PRC won't respond to India's request. Although India might revenge by inviting Uyghers terrorists, it won't able to make the ban proposal through the UN resolution without China agreement. China has the upper hands.
You are talking to a country who is P5. We have veto power, that's it. Cause our relationship is not good, and the problem is get Pakistan invloved, so we won't ban him. As reference to the continuous India's shield of China's dissidents, PRC won't respond to India's request. Although India might revenge by inviting Uyghers terrorists, it won't able to make the ban proposal through the UN resolution without China agreement. China has the upper hands.
good you can surround yourself with enemies as neighbours ,you can add more to the list to protect a terrorist.

Retaliate China for a stuff not related to us? Senseless. Provide Proof that Azhar is related to Taliban and Alqaeda, he will banned automatically in UN. The way you are pushing this is called playing rogue. Childish play.
you are pushing it bro,you don't give us proof about this guy ,how will our officer who issued visa know what he is .
 
China fired the first shot by vetoing the proposition in UN, this is retaliation. We will hit where it will hurt the most for China. SCS will be the next playground.

And who fired the first shot by harboring Dalai Lama? I bet Chinese politcians know well that Inida have the option to play Uyghur's card but we have proceed anyway with veto to tell that we're not deterred by your potential blackmail, you can call it til for tat :lol: if that please you but India gain nothing geopolitically by invite Uyghur to India beside venting your furstration.

And we look forward India to come to SCS to witness our mighty achievement with the Islands reclamation:D
 
good you can surround yourself with enemies as neighbours ,you can add more to the list to protect a terrorist.


you are pushing it bro,you don't give us proof about this guy ,how will our officer who issued visa know what he is .
This Uigher is a wanted by Interpol and Chinese government, a well known seperatist in China. We will have to get closer with our ally to protect ourself.

And who fired the first shot by harboring Dalai Lama? I bet Chinese politcians know well that Inida have the option to play Uyghur's card but we have proceed anyway with veto to tell that we're not deterred by your potential blackmail, you can call it til for tat :lol: if that please you but India gain nothing geopolitically by invite Uyghur to India beside venting your furstration.

And we look forward India to come to SCS to witness our mighty achievement with the Islands reclamation:D
India ask China to ban Azhr is a way to drive a wedge between China and Pakistan, China sure won't say yes to it. Stay with Pakistan is much safer than with India.
 
Back
Top Bottom