What's new

China readies for a sharp short war with Japan

I think it's China which is trying to scare countries by showing their reversed engineered aircraft, which are not even tested just used as a toy to showcase, US have got huge warships as well aircraft tested. Why do you think Chinese officials are hiding it from media, except just sharing pics.
We have enough strategic reserves to fight a very long war. Our war economy is one of the best in the world.

The US military has been grossly overhyped by Yankee propaganda mouthpieces to scare others. It's called psychological warfare. It's a decent military but not as invincible as the Yankee propaganda make them up to be.

The US got royally spanked the last time they messed with China in the Korean War.



Nice photoshop. It's nice to day dream huh
 
And for the "The USN will lose 10 supercarriers with 60,000 personnels" I have to say: pls dont listen to China's propaganda. China can not sink even a small US war ship now, so let alone the US super carriers. Fighting in real battle is so much different with what ur propagand bragging abt .

China's HGV is designated to hunt down the US supercarriers within the global range.

It can carry a payload up to 500kg with either an uber devastating conventional warhead or a sharp metal object to pierce the entire hull structure of the supercarrier with its velocity.

China can make 10000+ nukes, so sinking a couple of supercarriers is just a piece of cake.
 
Any source of your bragging except the manipulated Chinese info?
We have enough strategic reserves to fight a very long war. Our war economy is one of the best in the world.

The US military has been grossly overhyped by Yankee propaganda mouthpieces to scare others. It's called psychological warfare. It's a decent military but not as invincible as the Yankee propaganda make them up to be.

The US got royally spanked the last time they messed with China in the Korean War.



Nice photoshop. It's nice to day dream huh



Your army begged your regime not to go to war because they couldn't take another royal spanking at the hands of the PLA. Your regime wanted to fight, but your spineless military backed down.
 
The oil alone Xinjiang can feed us in the next 100 years. Meanwhile we will have Outer Mongolia in our bag.

Xinjiang has nearly 10 billion tons of oil, while Northeast China has discovered another oil field about 2 billion tons.

新疆油田7年累计探明石油地质储逾5亿吨
Okay, even u have enough oil, but u can not sell ur product to other nations bcz of US's sanction, ur economy still collapse ,too.
Hypersonicmissiles said:
Nice photoshop. It's nice to day dream huh
U should know that most of countries in the world said VN won, China lost in 1979. Only China's propaganda said China won and withdraw after 'completing' the mission. And pls dont forget that China came and begged for US's protection before attacking VN , but still lost.

As Henry J. Kenny points out, “Most Western writers agree that Vietnam had indeed outperformed the PLA on the battlefield, but say that with the seizure of Lang Son, the PLA was poised to move into the militarily more hospitable terrain of the Red River Delta, and thence to Hanoi.” Kenny, however, points out that Lang Son is less than twelve miles from the Chinese border but is twice that distance from the delta. Moreover, at least five PAVN divisions remained poised for a counterattack in the delta, and thirty thousand additional PAVN troops from Cambodia, along with several regiments from Laos, were moving to their support. Thus the PLA would have taken huge losses in any southward move toward Hanoi.
What the PLA Learned in Vietnam, 1979 | Far Outliers
Amid doubt that China would invade, Deng Xiaoping travelled to Washington to brief
President Carter on China's attack plans. Carter approved the Chinese invasion,
"protected" China from Soviet counterattack and pushed China for restraint.
The "worst possible case" of a nuclear war between China
and the Soviet Union
was averted.
9/11 intelligence; China invades Vietnam
 
China's HGV is designated to hunt down the US supercarriers within the global range.

It can carry a payload up to 500kg with either an uber devastating conventional warhead or a sharp metal object to pierce the entire hull structure of the supercarrier with its velocity.

China can make 10000+ nukes, so sinking a couple of supercarriers is just a piece of cake.
Pls show that ur missile can work well in real battle against US war ship first, we dont see any US warship sunk by China's missile now.

USA will be the one collapsed before China, since even their closest ally Britain wants to dump their green papers.

UK seeking to boost yuan trading role: Osborne - Yahoo News
Then US soon will teach UK a lesson like US teaching Japan now, maybe UK will lose Farkland to Argentina if UK keep trading currency with China :pop:
 
Pls show that ur missile can work well in real battle against US war ship first, we dont see any US warship sunk by China's missile now.

This is the hull metal of the supercarrier CVN-79.

HendrixF0May11.jpg



And this is the huge hole on the rock caused by China ASBM, almost like a meteor impact.

hqdefault.jpg


Then US soon will teach UK a lesson like US teaching Japan now, maybe UK will lose Farkland to Argentina if UK keep trading currency with China :pop:

Everyone want to dump their green papers, and what they gonna do? Punishing everybody? If so, this will only make all allies turn against USA.

China and Europe agree currency deal to boost trade - Oct. 10, 2013

Yuan takes another step forward as a world currency
 
Last edited:
Pls show that ur missile can work well in real battle against US war ship first, we dont see any US warship sunk by China's missile now.

The modern US warships are far from indestructible as you thought.

The US DDG collided with a tanker.

295773.jpg



And attacked by Al-Qaeda.

usscole_0000900.jpg
 
The modern US warships are far from indestructible as you thought.

The US DDG collided with a tanker.

295773.jpg



And attacked by Al-Qaeda.

usscole_0000900.jpg
I dont say US warships are indestructible . I means China dont have the guts to sink US warships coz China will face with US retaliation , thats why no single US warships sunk by China's missile until now even US is still controlling TW from Okinawa.
Everyone want to dump their green papers, and what they gonna do? Punishing everybody? If so, this will only make all allies turn against USA.
Big mistake in ur thinking, No Western dare to turn against USA coz they dont have oil like China in Xinjiang and they have to import oil from Middle east . None of them wanna be frozen to death in the winter .

China can not oust US's influence in Europe as long as US still control oil fielkd in M.E
 
I dont say US warships are indestructible . I means China dont have the guts to sink US warships coz China will face with US retaliation , thats why no single US warships sunk by China's missile until now even US is still controlling TW from Okinawa.

The nuclear retaliation means the mutual destruction.

Big mistake in ur thinking, No Western dare to turn against USA coz they dont have oil like China in Xinjiang and they have to import oil from Middle east . None of them wanna be frozen to death in the winter .

China can not oust US's influence in Europe as long as US still control oil fielkd in M.E

They all wanna dump the dollar anyway.

China is the first country after the WWII who dares to play the currency war with USA.

Saddam Hussein only wanna take Euro for his oil, the US has lynched him in the end.

But when China keeps pushing other countries to dump dollar, what US can do exactly? All they can do by now is to annoy China by meeting with that worthless Dalai Lama, this only further shows the sign of their desperation.
 
Last edited:
The nuclear retaliation means the mutual destruction.

.
And its China who dont have the guts to go nuke war with US, dont forget US still controlling ur TW and u dare not do anything to take TW back.
China is the first country after the WWII who dares to play the currency war with USA.

Saddam Hussein only wanna take Euro for his oil, the US has lynched him in the end.

But when China keeps pushing other countries to dump dollar, what US can do exactly? All they can do by now is to annoy China by meeting with that worthless Dalai Lama, this only further shows the sign of their desperation.
It means US consider Mr.Hussein is more dangerous than corrupted China generals bcz Hunssein can supply oil to Europe and let Europe turn against US when China can not do the same .
 
And its China who dont have the guts to go nuke war with US, dont forget US still controlling ur TW and u dare not do anything to take TW back.

When China has nothing to lose, then it won't give a damn anymore.

US knows how to not push a beast into the corner.

It means US consider Mr.Hussein is more dangerous than corrupted China generals bcz Hunssein can supply oil to Europe and let Europe turn against US when China can not do the same .

Saddam Hussein was weak as fck, that's why he got lynched by USA.

BTW, you forgot Russia, if US dares to sanction all European nations, then it only pushes them towards Russia, since Russia also has enough oil and gas to feed them.

Don't you like Putin? Even Russia does not trust China by 100%, but they do realize that they have to stick with China, since USA right now is out of their mind and keeps sending those suicide bombers to them.
 
When China has nothing to lose, then it won't give a damn anymore.

US knows how to not push a beast into the corner.
Ur poor peasants may have nothing to lose, but ur leaders, ur gens are so so rich and have many things to lose.

According to ur Boxun: Mr. Xi said: China having same situation like in 1948 , it means that , in the future,China likely having civil war than a war against mighty USA
Xi Jinping in 2013 Beidaihe meeting that in 2013 the Chinese Communist Party and the Kuomintang in 1948, the situation is similar, if not radical reform, will lose people, lose the country.He also noted that judicial corruption is the biggest corruption.

独家:北京智囊透露习近平令人耳目一新的治国方略.
 
Ur poor peasants may have nothing to lose, but ur leaders, ur gens are so so rich and have many things to lose.

According to ur Boxun: Mr. Xi said: China having same situation like in 1948 , it means China likely having civil war than a war against mighty USA

Boxun is a Falungong source, and it is completely bullshit.

These news were saying that China got 100 million members out of the communist party, since the communist party only got approximately 80 million membership.
 
Boxun is a Falungong source, and it is completely bullshit.

These news were saying that China got 100 million members out of the communist party, since the communist party only got approximately 80 million membership.
So, did Mr said : China having same situation like the Kuomintang party in 1948 in that meeting ??
 
Back
Top Bottom