Guynextdoor
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 732
- Reaction score
- 0
Very romantic except that we don't lve in the age of Chingiz Khan anymore. Fact is that there is too much at stake economically for anyone to go to war.I think that's certainly a possibility that should be entertained.
It seems reasonable from the Chinese defense perspective to attack, wage war, against Hind if Hind decides to engage in another war with Pakistan, for whatever reason. It would be a prime opportunity for China to seize South Tibet territory, and if PLA wants to drive into Northern Hind snatch and grab Dalai Lama as a war trophy, but maybe marginalizing him would be more effective.
The vice versa is also possibly likely.
Where China wages war against Hind and Pakistan decides to open a second front, really this would be a severe blow. Phones in Delhi would be busy calling for assistance and back up from Tel Aviv and Moscow hell even Washington.
Before or After such a war, both Pakistan and China should plan to carve out Hind provinces, and redrawing borders to suit Pakistan and China's interest. This would be politically and regionally ideal.
What do you say Gentleman (to Pakistanis and Chinese)?
There is land to be sought and spoil to be captured.
Why didn't India go to war after mumbai attacks? Fact is we could not. No matter how much noise we made, we knew it wouldn't be worth it. We attack you and before long instad of growing at 9% we'd be going at -2%. I can tell you more than one general was gnashing his teeth at this helplessness. Sure the chinese are stronger but the relative strength is nowhere near as is needed to ensure a 'victory'. And even if that victory is achieved after a protracted war, the economic damage would be too high to make this whole exercise look like a joke.