PureAryan
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 393
- Reaction score
- 0
who told him what hapened in the meeting?Neglect that one source if you want! Though your assumption that a "hindu" author will always tell a lie is an indicator of your mentality!
I'll just repost my sources again! (xxxx) indicates the year!
Sabhasad Bakhar (16xx)
Agnyadas powada (1650)
Shivbharat – Kavi Parmanad (1680), Edited by Sadashiv Divekar, Second Edition, November 1998, Shabdvedh Publication, Pune.
Raja Shiv Chatrapati (Vol 1) – Babasheb Purandare, Sixteen Edition, April 02, 2008, Purandare Publications, Pune
Vedh Mahanavcha –Dr.Shrinivas Samant, Fourth Edition, 2009, Deshmukh and Company Pvt. Ltd. Pune
Also, for your anglophillic mind which says Cambridge only knows the correct history, I've added a firangi, too!
The 33 Strategies of War – Robert Greene, 2009, Viva Books.
The author of your book was a Sanskrit teacher and most of the historical documents of that time were in Marathi or Urdu. Poor guy made a little error!
And my question remains, who told him what hapened in the meeting? As the survivors were marathas only and they do not agree with this version.
1922 or 1650 which year is earlier?
P.S. Start a thread! Do not derail this one!
Why dont you go and ask the cambridge professors yourself,
Now you are talking nonsense,
I dont come here to start petty arguments with bhatis, any hindu of that time would write false history, Is there any country who trust bhartis, i doubt that,
I can give you dozens of other authors who call shivaji a cunning criminal who ravaged the land of Adil shahs region and he never won any battle with the brave muslims, You have forgotten the thousand year muslim rule go to any other major city of bharat to see huge minarets mosques towers, taj mahal to remind you of our rule, Such a pity on you people, a few thousand people held togrther millions of bhartis for 1000 years, Bharat is a hunting ground for muslim these are not my words but historians
Last edited: