What's new

China provokes again, troops enter Indian territory in Ladakh

Why don't look for some information regarding Chola incident if your censorland hadn't censored that.

To be frank every single Chinese is waiting for India to fire the first shot. The time when Indian fire, is the time we take back South Tibet.

Last time, Hindu did it once in 1962. Your government told you guys China retreated 100% and Chinese do not want to embarrass you guys. There are significant territory gain after 1962, especially in Aksai Chin. India used to stick his leg into Aksai Chin, now she is out completely.

Your government and PRC told you China withdraw 100% so that both states will have less squabble after 1962. Even in Eastern sector there are gains.

Before Nehru annex north of McMahon lines. After, India army is South of McMahon.
 
.
To be frank every single Chinese is waiting for India to fire the first shot. The time when Indian fire, is the time we take back South Tibet.

Last time, Hindu did it once in 1962. Your government told you guys China retreated 100% and Chinese do not want to embarrass you guys. There are significant territory gain after 1962, especially in Aksai Chin. India used to stick his leg into Aksai Chin, now she is out completely.

Your government and PRC told you China withdraw 100% so that both states will have less squabble after 1962. Even in Eastern sector there are gains.

Before Nehru annex north of McMahon lines. After, India army is South of McMahon.


If you are a Tibetan, you have every right to question Mcmohan line and the agreement between Tibet and India, If you are from China you have nothing to do with Mcmohan line.

Tibet is under oppression waiting to be liberated.
 
.
If you are a Tibetan, you have every right to question Mcmohan line and the agreement between Tibet and India, If you are from China you have nothing to do with Mcmohan line.

Tibet is under oppression waiting to be liberated.

McMahon lines goes to British India due to naked aggression. India cannot even prove she is a unitary state with certain core immutable territory and she has no proof of sovereignty of any Tibet land. China can proof she hold Tibet. And if Tibet go independence, how about asking south tibet back from India as it is a result of British aggression.

China is actually tacitly recognizing McMahon line and even annex of Sikkim. You IQ82 Hindus go and think about it and repent your nazism. That is the reason PLA withdraw North of Mcmahon.

India repay China kindness with their shitt and lies.

And the one who do not recognize McMahon line is India. When war broke out in 1962, she was north of Mcmahon.
 
.
McMahon lines goes to British India due to naked aggression. India cannot even prove she is a unitary state with certain core immutable territory and she has no proof of sovereignty of any Tibet land. China can proof she hold Tibet. And if Tibet go independence, how about asking south tibet back from India as it is a result of British aggression.

British India and Tibet agreed to Mcmohan line and China has nothing to do with this. People of North eastern states vote for the government in New Delhi, If the same vote power is given Tibet Majority votes will go for Independence, the same goes to Xinjiang.

China is not a unitary state but a dictatorship oppressing people's rights and cultures, Allow free press and you will find how many Manchus,Hakkas and Mongolians are unhappy in China.

Their Languages and cultures are oppressed and Now CCP is calling them dialects of Mandarin instead of Language. Chinese hans who are from North East part of China are oppressing various provinces in the name of Han china.

China is actually tacitly recognizing McMahon line and even annex of Sikkim. You IQ82 Hindus go and think about it and repent your nazism. That is the reason PLA withdraw North of Mcmahon.

India repay China kindness with their shitt and lies.

China has nothing to do with Indo-Tibet border.

And the one who do not recognize McMahon line is India. When war broke out in 1962, she was north of Mcmahon.

India recognizes Mcmohan line.
 
.
British India and Tibet agreed to Mcmohan line and China has nothing to do with this. People of North eastern states vote for the government in New Delhi, If the same vote power is given Tibet Majority votes will go for Independence, the same goes to Xinjiang.

China is not a unitary state but a dictatorship oppressing people's rights and cultures, Allow free press and you will find how many Manchus,Hakkas and Mongolians are unhappy in China.

Their Languages and cultures are oppressed and Now CCP is calling them dialects of Mandarin instead of Language. Chinese hans who are from North East part of China are oppressing various provinces in the name of Han china.



China has nothing to do with Indo-Tibet border.



India recognizes Mcmohan line.

UK has always recognize China's suzerainty/sovereignty of Tibet and that is why Ivan Chen was invited. You sign it without Ivan Chen's signature, that is the reason of your trouble.

You are lying if you say people in NE India will note for New Delhi. There are separatist militant in from Assam to Manipur. How about Kashmir?

Whether China is communist or democracy does not negate the fact that China is a unitary state. She is under hereditary dictator for 2300 years.

Please do not talk too much about Mongolian , Manchurians or Hakka if you know nuts about China. A lot of Chinese do not speak Mandarin as mother tongue. I am Taiwanese speaker and yet I detest Taiwanese independent.

The Manchus are the one who are responsible for the spread of Mandarin FYI.

India has nothing to do with South Tibet.
 
.
Right now, I see from China resource that Kashmiri has been appealing to China for support, but got rejected. India is a shitt country that do not know the kindness of China. China even recognize India annex of Sikkim.

If India keep playing fire, China may support Kashmiri, and since you guys are already supporting Tibetan, you have exhausted all your leverage.

When India got exhausted in Kashmir, China may rekindle Manipur, Nagaland, Assamese who are now more or less low level, and also support Maoist.

You guys has all the shitt race problem in your country and Han Chinese are 100% harmony. Still dare to complain our racial policy.
 
Last edited:
.
UK has always recognize China's suzerainty/sovereignty of Tibet and that is why Ivan Chen was invited. You sign it without Ivan Chen's signature, that is the reason of your trouble.

You are lying if you say people in NE India will note for New Delhi. There are separatist militant in from Assam to Manipur. How about Kashmir?

Whether China is communist or democracy does not negate the fact that China is a unitary state. She is under hereditary dictator for 2300 years.

Please do not talk too much about Mongolian , Manchurians or Hakka if you know nuts about China. A lot of Chinese do not speak Mandarin as mother tongue. I am Taiwanese speaker and yet I detest Taiwanese independent.

The Manchus are the one who are responsible for the spread of Mandarin FYI.

India has nothing to do with South Tibet.

Machus got nothing to do with Mandarin. Mandarin was long adopted by Hans people during Ming dynasty and its was a Han(Zhu Di), second reign of Ming dynasty that he decides to moved the capital to Beijing and adopt Mandarin as the official government language. The Manchu just carry on what Ming dynasty left over for Qing dynasty.

Its was CCP that responsible for the spread of Mandarin for the whole China. But before that Mandarin already long dominate the whole north China.
 
.
Machus got nothing to do with Mandarin. Mandarin was long adopted by Hans people during Ming dynasty and its was a Han(Zhu Di), second reign of Ming dynasty that he decides to moved the capital to Beijing and adopt Mandarin as the official government language. The Manchu just carry on what Ming dynasty left over for Qing dynasty.

Its was CCP that responsible for the spread of Mandarin for the whole China. But before that Mandarin already long dominate the whole north China.

Mandarin is a northern Sinitic lect that Manchus are familiar with. The Manchus are very sincized before they conquered China, and after they took Beijing, the result is the Mandarin that what we hear today.

From Baidu

满清入主中原,虽然定满语为国语,但全国通行的实为汉语,汉官多操明代官话,所以清朝官场上的官方语言,实际上是满汉双语制。满族人进入北京后学说汉语北京官话,又把自己的满语音韵和发音习惯、特色文化词汇带入自己的满式汉语,于清末形成满汉语言成分融合的京腔旗人话,使其成为现代标准北京语音的前身。北平音系的声调,为阴平、阳平、上、去之四声,而没有入声
 
.
Mandarin is a northern Sinitic lect that Manchus are familiar with. The Manchus are very sincized before they conquered China, and after they took Beijing, the result is the Mandarin that what we hear today.

From Baidu

满清入主中原,虽然定满语为国语,但全国通行的实为汉语,汉官多操明代官话,所以清朝官场上的官方语言,实际上是满汉双语制。满族人进入北京后学说汉语北京官话,又把自己的满语音韵和发音习惯、特色文化词汇带入自己的满式汉语,于清末形成满汉语言成分融合的京腔旗人话,使其成为现代标准北京语音的前身。北平音系的声调,为阴平、阳平、上、去之四声,而没有入声

Nonsense. They are plenty of bogus source from Baidu slandering Mandarin. Just check out youtube and see how Mandarin and Manchu sounds like from each other. and You will know the truth. In fact, Cantonese has almost half of the tone sounds similiar to Mandarin. Canton people are essential Hans from central China thousands years ago migrant into southern China.
 
.
McMahon lines goes to British India due to naked aggression. India cannot even prove she is a unitary state with certain core immutable territory and she has no proof of sovereignty of any Tibet land. China can proof she hold Tibet. And if Tibet go independence, how about asking south tibet back from India as it is a result of British aggression.

China is actually tacitly recognizing McMahon line and even annex of Sikkim. You IQ82 Hindus go and think about it and repent your nazism. That is the reason PLA withdraw North of Mcmahon.

India repay China kindness with their shitt and lies.

And the one who do not recognize McMahon line is India. When war broke out in 1962, she was north of Mcmahon.

You can live in any kind of delusion, we don't care.
hahaha.gif


Nonsense. They are plenty of bogus source from Baidu slandering Mandarin. Just check out youtube and see how Mandarin and Manchu sounds like from each other. and You will know the truth. In fact, Cantonese has almost half of the tone sounds similiar to Mandarin. Canton people are essential Hans from central China thousands years ago migrant into southern China.

Manchu is not a Sino-Tibetan language. :girl_wacko:
 
.
Nonsense. They are plenty of bogus source from Baidu slandering Mandarin. Just check out youtube and see how Mandarin and Manchu sounds like from each other. and You will know the truth. In fact, Cantonese has almost half of the tone sounds similiar to Mandarin. Canton people are essential Hans from central China thousands years ago migrant into southern China.

I am not saying Manchus is mandarin. They are not. But Manchus are very sinicized even before they invade Ming. The Beijing lect received some influence when Manchus and Han mixed in BJ..
 
.
I am not saying Manchus is mandarin. They are not. But Manchus are very sinicized even before they invade Ming. The Beijing lect received some influence when Manchus and Han mixed in BJ..

Wu Sangui is considered as traitor of Chinese people for collaborating with Manchus and opening the gates of Great Wall of China for them, now you trying to tell us some other fake history to prove Manchus as Chinese. :omghaha::omghaha:

She is under hereditary dictator for 2300 years.

You think you can convince us this kind of fake history. :laugh:
 
.
Wu Sangui is considered as traitor of Chinese people for collaborating with Manchus and opening the gates of Great Wall of China for them, now you trying to tell us some other fake history to prove Manchus as Chinese. :omghaha::omghaha:

Whether Manchus is Han Chinese or not, Tibet is still China's. Whether British are Indian or not, Indian will claim South Tibet because it was "conquered by British".

Indian got no logic.
 
.
I am not saying Manchus is mandarin. They are not. But Manchus are very sinicized even before they invade Ming. The Beijing lect received some influence when Manchus and Han mixed in BJ..

Mandarin inherit more of its ancestry from Shandong language. A Shandong language essentially is just speaking mandarin with slight different tone. Mandarin never do anything with Manchu or Mongolian. They are essentially a Han language.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom