China needs to be sensitive of India's concerns: analyst

[Bang Galore]

once again that despotic indian regime is threatening peaceful countries from having diplomatic and economic relationships.
no wonder countries like sri lanka, pakistan and bangladesh seek closer ties with china.
once we give other countries an option to move away from india towards us, then those smaller countries will embrace china. the indian regime is keeping its thumb under those countries like a typical dictatorship. it wont allow a country like bhutan to have relationship with others.
remember how that murderous indian regime invaded and colonised sikkim. typical of a tyrannical hegemonic murderer.
its a play straight out from the nazi germany book.
same sh*t, different a$$hole.

as i have said we must support the independence of the tamils, sikhs and minorities and do our best to break up the current indian union into many smaller countries.
otherwise i fear india has ambitions similar to what nazi germany had.....regional dominance followed by global dominance.

we must encircle the heinous indian regime using sri lanka, pakistan, bangladesh and others so that indian hegemonic amitions can be ruthlessly crushed like we did in 1962 when nehru started his aggressive foward policy and invade us.
all the countries in the sub-continent can see right through the true indian hegemonc ambitions, thats why all those countries seek close ties with us.

its imperative we cause internal chaos and destabilize india from within, they have many frictions with many ethnic groups that seeks their freedom and independence from the regime but is being ruthlessly crushed as all despotic regimes do.

Another stand up comedian.

 

[Springfield]

By using the title of this thread, India has to be sensitive of what Bhutan wants and needs too. There is no reason whatsoever India should stop Bhutan of having a diplomatic tie or trade with any country and if she does, it will only pushes Bhutan away from her.

Inspite of all the empty talks of "freedom" & "Democracy" by many indian members at PDF; India is just another imperial colonial power.

 

[Srinivas]

Only diplomatic relations, if Bhutan want defense ties with us it's up to them.

Just like phillipines and Taiwan.

 

[ChinaToday]

Typical india evil mentality , they are always strir unrest ,riot and interfere in her neighbours so that non of them can have ecoconmy growth to improve the live of their people.

 

[cloud]

Akhand bharat dreaming retards are pissing in their pants just hearing about Buthan diplomatic relations with China They don't even want Buthan to have even basic relation with any country other than mata bharat and these shameless hypocrites talk about Chinese hegemony.
Pathetic indians , if you are so afraid annex buthan like sikkim. Hypocrites.

Jamathi mullah's a$$ on fire again... fire alert.. How much rotten is it?? Don't show it in your face..
...

Inspite of all the empty talks of "freedom" & "Democracy" by many indian members at PDF; India is just another imperial colonial power.

Still better then people who ran away like dogs and now barking from far away..

 

[Mujraparty]

Akhand bharat dreaming retards are pissing in their pants just hearing about Buthan diplomatic relations with China.They don't even want Buthan to have even basic relation with any country other than mata bharat and these shameless hypocrites talk about Chinese hegemony.
Pathetic indians , if you are so afraid annex buthan like sikkim. Hypocrites.

i think mods should put a leash a on inbred jamati retard's ...

 

[Rajaraja Chola]

No, find a Chinese source.

The Pakistanis themselves tell me not to trust the Pakistani media when it comes to reporting on China.

And I'm obviously not going to trust your weird Indian sources.

So u want us to believe Chinese communist propaganda , forcely propagated through newspapers , for making the citizens of ur country believe their line

Typical india evil mentality , they are always strir unrest ,riot and interfere in her neighbours so that non of them can have ecoconmy growth to improve the live of their people.

Pls improve the life of ur dearest N korean people and Pakistani people if u call them allies !!
China takes its interest more , than its satellite states !!

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Yep, the Chinese leaders are the same ones who helped Pakistan acquire nuclear weapons,

So you admit China assisted Pakistan for nuclear weapons program?

smashed India in 1962,

And lets India have Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim

make incursions into the Indian border several hundred times a year (according to your own defence minister)

If CCP had anything to do with the above , then China is being an irresponsible state.

If not then disciplinary issues in the PLA guards around the border, which is again a threat fro PLA itself.

We all know what some undisciplined Imperial Japanese troops in WW2 caused.

.

.. issued stapled visas to people coming from ONLY IoK,

Ok! By the way, Why doesn't China recognized IoK as

not to mention the ones who stationed PLA soldiers in Gilgit Baltistan as per Pakistan's request.

Is there an official confirmation from either Pakistani or Chinese Govt on this?

Because if it is, then this an insult to Pakistan, even from the Chinese point of view.

Considering the word our Chinese members here use for Korean and Japanese for having American troops on their soil.

They are a lot more hardcore than I am, I would have only done half those things.

What would that half those things include?

Inspite of all the empty talks of "freedom" & "Democracy" by many indian members at PDF; India is just another imperial colonial power.

Should that be same case with China vis North Korea and Pol pot regime?

 

[Ajaxpaul]

i think mods should put a leash a on inbred jamati retard's ...

Why complaining here...they have the right to blabber whatever they want...

Their hopes went in flames in 71. No need to control them. Whatever they spew and do will affect their own country only.

 

[Springfield]

Jamathi mullah's a$$ on fire again... fire alert.. How much rotten is it?? Don't show it in your face..
...



Still better then people who ran away like dogs and now barking from far away..

I have strong adversion towards bullies. This is what I have to say: The neighbourhood bully got owned; he is still crying 60 years on and counting.

 

[Matrixx]

Akhand bharat dreaming retards are pissing in their pants just hearing about Buthan diplomatic relations with China.They don't even want Buthan to have even basic relation with any country other than mata bharat and these shameless hypocrites talk about Chinese hegemony.
Pathetic indians , if you are so afraid annex buthan like sikkim. Hypocrites.

Look who is talking...you can not even go out of you country with out India's permission .... looser

 

[Pakistanisage]

Does India have a claim on all the countries of South Asia ?

Probably only in the minds of Indians.

Wake up to the reality Indians, you do not own South Asia.

South Asian countries can have a relationship with China or any other country without the approval of India.

 

[Matrixx]

I don't see why. Might rules the world. does America show any sensitivity for weaker countries-no. Why should China?? Why expect higher standards of some but not others?

Hope you are expecting the same for your country...

Does India have a claim on all the countries of South Asia ?

Probably only in the minds of Indians.

Wake up to the reality Indians, you do not own South Asia.

South Asian countries can have a relationship with China or any other country without the approval of India.

If they can live with angry India...then good luck to them...

 

[kalu_miah]

once again that despotic indian regime is threatening peaceful countries from having diplomatic and economic relationships.
no wonder countries like sri lanka, pakistan and bangladesh seek closer ties with china.
once we give other countries an option to move away from india towards us, then those smaller countries will embrace china. the indian regime is keeping its thumb under those countries like a typical dictatorship. it wont allow a country like bhutan to have relationship with others.
remember how that murderous indian regime invaded and colonised sikkim. typical of a tyrannical hegemonic murderer.
its a play straight out from the nazi germany book.
same sh*t, different a$$hole.

as i have said we must support the independence of the tamils, sikhs and minorities and do our best to break up the current indian union into many smaller countries.
otherwise i fear india has ambitions similar to what nazi germany had.....regional dominance followed by global dominance.

we must encircle the heinous indian regime using sri lanka, pakistan, bangladesh and others so that indian hegemonic amitions can be ruthlessly crushed like we did in 1962 when nehru started his aggressive foward policy and invade us.
all the countries in the sub-continent can see right through the true indian hegemonc ambitions, thats why all those countries seek close ties with us.

its imperative we cause internal chaos and destabilize india from within, they have many frictions with many ethnic groups that seeks their freedom and independence from the regime but is being ruthlessly crushed as all despotic regimes do.

Well said, my kinda guy, could not have said it better myself. You guys are finally starting to see real face of "shining" India, the beacon of "freedom and democracy" which is in effect a murderous thugocracy. No one is safe from India, not her neighbors, not even far away countries. Indians are delusional, but one thing they are good at, pushing a consistent propaganda line that serves their interest and keeping a smile on the face, with one hand extended to shake hand while holding a dagger on the other hand, hiding behind the back.

And my observations has been confirmed and verified by at least one other source, a team of 50,000 Korean netizens, about the arrogance and delusional nature of Indians. Look up missyusa.com.

 

[Sashan]

I believe Bhutan and China relation will be purely diplomatically and economically. China doesn't need any military alliance with Bhutan for two reasons, one Bhutan has nothing to offer and secondly why ruin the relationship with India that took painful care to build up.

China and Russia are now in the process of building a 'vote block' in the UN against the western alliance, every extra vote on their side doesn't hurt.

Here is another view on this from The Hindu. (sorry - I had to repost again from a separate thread I opened yesterday). The Chinese state run think tank seem to think it had the tacit support of India. It is too early to predict this is a change in Bhutan's foreign policy.


Bhutan’s move reflects maturing Sino-Indian ties

Bhutan’s willingness to establish diplomatic ties with China, expressed by Prime Minister Jigmi Y. Thinley last week during the first ever meeting with his Chinese counterpart, has been seen here as reflecting maturing Sino-Indian ties. Analysts perceive New Delhi’s assumed tacit support for the move as heralding a new approach to regional diplomacy.

The heads of government of Bhutan and China held their first ever meeting on Thursday on the sidelines of the United Nations Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development in Brazil. During the meeting with Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, Mr. Thinley said Bhutan “wishes to forge formal diplomatic ties with China as soon as possible”.

Bhutan, which enjoys close historical, political and military relations with India, has had a strained relationship with China, sourced in a boundary dispute over which the two countries have held 19 rounds of talks. Following a package offer from China in the last round, Mr. Wen last week said China was “willing to complete border demarcation with Bhutan at an early date”, telling his counterpart that Beijing pursued “a foreign policy of good-neighbourliness”.

In Beijing, where Bhutan is widely seen as a close Indian ally, the moves have been seen by some analysts as being backed by New Delhi, suggesting for them a new approach in India’s diplomacy in a region where it has been wary of any Chinese influence.

“Without Indian permission, Bhutan would not take this step,” said Li Li, a South Asia scholar at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR), a state-run Beijing think-tank. “My personal feeling,” she told The Hindu in an interview, “is that the move must have the approval or agreement of India, as Bhutan has a very special relationship with India.”

Ms. Li said the move was “a very good sign for the China-India relationship”, suggesting a new “confidence” in New Delhi with Bhutan and China “normalising their relationship”.

“This means that at the Indian government, at the Ministry of External Affairs, the people in charge of China relations have a very clear idea,” she said. “This is very good for the China-India relationship, that India does not think [China’s] ties will Bhutan will be a threat.”

Yang Xiaoping, another South Asia scholar at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), added that any concerns India might have would be “understandable, but unnecessary”. Speaking to the Communist Party-run Global Times , a paper known for its nationalist views, she “urged China to understand India’s concern, saying that the two sides have complementary strengths, and they can help ensure regional stability.”

The Hindu : Today's Paper / INTERNATIONAL : Bhutan