Well, there goes any pretence of these being civilian projects. Putting missiles there doesn't make China's claims any more legitimate.
They are still strictly civilian. You got to believe it.
Artificially created structures in international waters, equipped with naval- and airbases and airdefences. Coastal missiles batteries will be next. The recoures issues aside, all this will pose a risk to the free flow of international sea and air traffic in the area and region.
Being the largest trading nation on the face of the earth, China will invest more in terms of protecting world trade routes. If the US wants to cooperate, they can join us.
Building them does not magically turn international waters into Chinese territorial waters. Likewise international airspace and aircraft identification zone.
China builds in its sovereign territories, in the first place. And China does not claim EEZ beyond 200NM of the Spratlys as a whole. Same goes with the Xisha.
Let imagine if US does the same thing anywhere they can? Build artificial islands and block the routes
Study the case Ly Son islands Vietnam. The Vietnamese lived in the islands several centuries.
How the rule over these water ( near Vietnam coast ) not belong to Vietnamese in the island and the coast but the passing Chinese fishermen or traders? see 9 dashed line.
mentioned that in 1974 a part of Paracels still occupied by Vietnamese. Chinese put them out by force in a clash in 1974.
They criticized China to deploy missiles to disputed islands. That's the major point.
And yet you have invaded some 28 islands that belonged to China, originally. China has merely 8 islands in the Nanshaqundao.
And you claim further islands from China. That's a little greedy, my friend.
That's why there an ongoing case at court of PCA La Haye
The ongoing Arbitration is not about sovereignty, as the Philippines said many times in their hearing presentation. If it was about sovereignty, Vietnam would oppose it, in the first place.
Vietnam sent observers not to support the Philippines, but to see if the Philippines' Submissions would breach Vietnam's interests.
At the end of the day, everybody is alone in the jungle. Yet, our focus is not on you, but on the US. So, no worries, my friend. We will be fine together.
***
HQ-9 missile prompted by US threat
2016-2-19 0:28:01
HQ-9 missile prompted by US threat - Global Times
US Secretary of State John Kerry said on Wednesday that "There is every evidence, every day that there has been an increase of militarization of one kind or another," referring to the reported Chinese deployment of missiles in the "disputed" islands in the South China Sea. He said "it's of serious concern" and the US will "have further very serious conversation" with China. The US media has responded strongly to the allegations that China has deployed HQ-9 surface-to-air missiles on Yongxing Island, one of the islands in the Xisha chain. US Senate Armed Forces Chairman John McCain suggested the US consider "additional options to raise the costs on Beijing's behavior."
The HQ-9 missile is a typical type of defensive weapon. The Xisha Islands are Chinese territory and have long been under China's actual control. Previous disputes in the South China Sea did not involve this area, but this time the US has targeted Yongxing Island in Xisha to attack China's "militarization" of the South China Sea. Washington intends to not only tarnish China's image, but also expand the disputes so as to contain China's activities in the Nansha Islands.
The confrontation between China and the US in the South China Sea is likely to escalate. The whole of Chinese society should be cool-minded and be prepared for long-term competition with the US.
First, we should be clear about the country's stance toward the South China Sea. We are safeguarding our legitimate rights without any radical moves. Island building in Nansha and missile deployment in Xisha are in accordance with international law.
Second, China cares about developing ties with all regional countries. The missiles in Yongxing do not target any South China Sea claimants.
Third, China should send clear messages to the outside world that its defensive deployment in Yongxing targets external military threats. The freedom of navigation in the South China Sea only applies to civilian vessels and aerial vehicles. Outside warships and jet fighters must obey the principle of "innocent passage." American warships and flights have constantly made provocations in the South China Sea. The US is bold about imposing pressure on China, and China must make an appropriate response.
Fourth, how the PLA deploys weapons and the defense levels should be determined by the threat level from external military forces. If the US military stages a real threat and a military clash is looming, the PLA may feel propelled to deploy more powerful weapons.
Fifth, China does not want to see an escalation of Sino-US frictions in the South China Sea, but it should let the US know that its every single provocative act will face countermeasures from China.
Sixth, the main risks come from the uncertainty of intensity of China-US competition. It is unrealistic for relevant countries to woo the US to balance China.
Last, China should adopt an active approach to cope with an opinion war and express its stance to the world. China holds firm strategic initiatives in the South China Sea, and the US has no actual effective tools to contain China in the waters. It is best at rhetoric offense, so we must reason with it head-on.
