What's new

China Economy Forum

In Swiss watchmaking, there is no Haute Couture or ready to wear, everything is on catalogue. Boucheron, Chanel, Chaumet, Dior.... are not watchmaker like Patek Philipe or Audemar Piguet. They are fashion houses.

My point is, it can be both practical and luxury like Swiss watches.

It's very hard to compare a rather technical product such as watches to a piece of garment. Women won't bitch about another woman wearing the same watch but you don't want to look at the face of a woman seeing another one wearing the same robe even if that garment just costs a few hundred euros. If those eyes could kill ... I tell you. :sniper:

Boucheron and Chaumet don't make fashion, they are jewelleries and watchmakers.
 
It's very hard to compare a rather technical product such as watches to a piece of garment. Women won't bitch about another woman wearing the same watch but you don't want to look at the face of a woman seeing another one wearing the same robe even if that garment just costs a few hundred euros. If those eyes could kill ... I tell you. :sniper:

Boucheron and Chaumet don't make fashion, they are jewelleries and watchmakers.


I guess it's the same reason why women would pay 3 or 4 times more for a leather bag with "Hermes" logo over other luxury brands.

Boucheron and Chaumet are no Manufacture watchmakers, jewellers perhaps.
 
I guess it's the same reason why women would pay 3 or 4 times more for a leather bag with "Hermes" logo over other luxury brands.

Boucheron and Chaumet are no Manufacture watchmakers, jewellers perhaps.

And why do they pay a few thousand euros or even more for an Hermès bag and not for a Chinese bag? It's the French aura of luxury, a luxury based on impractical upholding of old workmanship, of tradition, of heritage and at the same time be the avantgard of modernity. Outside of Europe, only the Japanese have managed to do that. China has all the ingredients to build up a luxury industry, what lacks is understanding of what is real luxury. It's much more than just money and blinkblink.

In fact, if we go back to imperial China, there were lots of people who knew what is luxury. ;)
 
And why do they pay a few thousand euros or even more for an Hermès bag and not for a Chinese bag? It's the French aura of luxury, a luxury based on impractical upholding of old workmanship, of tradition, of heritage and at the same time be the avantgard of modernity. Outside of Europe, only the Japanese have managed to do that. China has all the ingredients to build up a luxury industry, what lacks is understanding of what is real luxury. It's much more than just money and blinkblink.

In fact, if we go back to imperial China, there were lots of people who knew what is luxury. ;)

No, I said Hermes bag over other luxury brands, not Chinese. Hermes cost 3 or 4 times more than LV or Gucci. Women don't want to be seen carrying the same bag too, not just dress.

China has the tradition and history, but it's going to take time to create a luxury brand, part of the brand cache comes with the image of the country, it has to be a developed country.
 
No, I said Hermes bag over other luxury brands, not Chinese. Hermes cost 3 or 4 times more than LV or Gucci. Women don't want to be seen carrying the same bag too, not just dress.

China has the tradition and history, but it's going to take time to create a luxury brand, part of the brand cache comes with the image of the country, it has to be a developed country.

In fact, Hermès and Louis Vuitton have all the qualifications to make haute couture without putting more money into it but decided not to. They just use the image that other French couture houses have created to sell their products. Clever, ey? ;)

The Chinese gov. has to make sure that any brand that has the potential to become a luxury brand is well protected by enforced laws and also invest money into tradition handcrafts to keep them alive and innovating. Anciennité is an importnt USP in the luxury industry.

You know the problem that Chinese companies copying other Chinese companies is the biggest problem righ now.
 
China becomes top gold producer and consumer in the world
January 23, 2014 1:00 pm
China becomes the world’s largest gold consumer thanks to soaring purchases of jewellery, minted Panda coins and small gold bars.

According to the Thomson Reuters GFMS gold survey, the most widely followed report on the industry, Chinese demand reached 1,189.8 tonnes last year, a 32 per cent year-on-year jump and a fivefold increase since 2003.
made China the number one global consumer of industrial metals such as copper, aluminium and zinc.

The frenetic buying of gold in China, which led to a temporary shortage of physical stocks, was sparked by the 28 per cent fall in the precious metal’s price last year, the worst performance in more than three decades.

Following a 12-year bull run, gold lost its lustre in Europe and North America as economic conditions improved and the prospects of inflation receded. Western investors dumped gold-backed exchange traded funds in 2013, with holdings falling by 880 tonnes.

A simultaneous “Asian-led buying frenzy”, with consumers chasing bargains, resulted in gold bars being removed from vaults in Europe and other markets, melted into smaller bars in Swiss refineries, and shipped to the East. GFMS described the flow as the “largest movement of gold, by value, in history”.

Because many Chinese buy jewellery for investment reasons rather than adornment, high purity 24 carat gold products dominated sales. Purchases of physical bars – mostly kilobars and smaller weights – rose 47 per cent to 366 tonnes, a new record.

In recent years, China has also become the world’s biggest gold producer, with estimated output of 437.3 tonnes last year. Although there are no official figures, some of that metal is thought to have been purchased by the People’s Bank of China. The central bank last reported holdings of 1,054 tonnes, in 2009.
 
GRP-2013_zps0eb1983e.png


GRPpercapita2013_zps4a93f445.png
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Korea's exports to China hit record high of 26% in 2013
Updated: 2014-01-27 PM 2:29:56 (KST)

Korea has become even more dependent on China as an export destination.
The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy says exports to China accounted for 26 percent of Korea's export total of 5-hundred billion U.S. dollars last year -- the highest rate ever recorded.
Mobile phone parts, semiconductors, auto parts and automobiles made up the bulk of exports to China, resulting in a trade surplus of 60.6 billion dollars, which is higher than Korea's export surplus of 44.2 billion dollars.
Experts say Korea should take a more aggressive approach in dealing with the ever-growing Chinese market, adding it may need to reduce its dependence on China in the future, given its slowing economic growth.
Arirang News :: Korea's exports to China hit record high of 26% in 2013
 
From what I understand

China imports basic goods from SoKo -> Value adds in the form of manufacturing -> Exports it out
 
Anchor: On Jan. 21, the mainland’s central bank injected an unprecedented amount of funding with more than 370 billion RMB. This action attracted international media attention towards China’s “money shortage”. Hong Shengli, the lead researcher of Guo Qing Nei Can journal in Beijing, and Dr. Chen Zhifei, a professor of economics at the City University of New York, will explain the reasons for the shortage of money. Please watch the report from NTD TV reporter Tang Yin.

Reporter: On Jan. 21, the Central Bank launched the “255 billion yuan ($42 billion) reverse repurchase agreements”, including 75 billion 7 day reverse repurchase agreements and 180 billion 21 day reverse repurchase agreements, which hit a new high position within around 11 months. Until Jan. 20, the Central Bank had already provided 120 billion yuan in short-term liquidity to large commercial banks by using the standing lending facility (SLF).

“Reverse Repurchase” agreements means the central bank increased the supply of money to the market by buying securities from primary dealers.
These unprecedented large actions from the central bank caused media attention on China’s money shortage issue, which included the Wall Street Journal and CNN.
Gong Shengli, the lead researcher of the Guo Qing Nei Can journal in Beijing analyzed that the huge amounts of money injected by the Central bank in China is related to the accelerating recovery of the U.S. dollar in the United States. The Central bank in China plans to prevent the money shortage.
Gong Shengli: There is a massive contraction on the loose monetary policy in USA. If the dollar were to recover, there wouldn’t be enough money in the money market. China will be greatly affected as other currencies on the market may fill in.
Dr. Chen Zhifei, the professor of economics at the City University of New York analyzed that the U.S. economy has bottomed out. Therefore, the United States Federal Reserve Bank decided to cancel the loose monetary policy. If the U.S. dollar has recovered, the RMB exchange rate could be lowering.
On Jan. 20, the Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate (Shibor) rose universally. The industry exclaimed, “money shortage has come back”.

The stock market was hit due to the rise in market rates. The Shanghai Composite Index fell below the 2,000 points mark,which is its lowest level in nearly six months.
After the reverse repos news came out, the inter-bank market got quite excited. The interbank seven-day repo rate fell to 5.5% on Jan. 21, which is a significant decline by comparing it with the 7.5% drop on Jan. 20. The money market rates have stabilized quickly.
Chen Zhifei: The central bank has focused on the main urgent needs. There is no specific strategy for long-term markets, including easing the economy. It shows that China’s economy is very fragile. The central bank also knows that it can not bear such a long-term risk. The only way is to provide short-term support.
For this massive injection of funds, the official claims is, that the target is to strengthen the liquidity of the banking system. Cao Fengqi, the director of the Finance and Securities Research Center of Guanghua School of Management at Peking University, pointed out that according to a practical demands, the money shortage could happen without the massive currency. The massive currency issued shows the efficiency of capital utilization is getting worse.

The industry insiders estimate that 21 day reverse repos stretch across the Chinese New Year, which could be sufficient to ensure the supply of funds over the year and pause the money shortage worries. However, the reverse repos will expire after the Chinese New Year. There is still a possibility of capital return. It does not mean that loose monetary policy will be shifted.
Chen Zhifei believed that it is not optimistic with the situation after the Chinese New Year. Besides, there could be bigger worries according to China’s economic structural problems.
Chen Zhifei: After the economic crisis, the central government provided a lot of money, which has been invested in real estate and infrastructure projects with very low or negative returns. These debts are going to expire and these infrastructure projects, such as high-speed railway, are losing money. Then these debt problems caused a shortage of money. The lenders are mainly the central and local governments.

According to the report from CNN TV on Jan. 21, analysts are worried that the new credit may no longer generate strong economic returns. The ballooning of borrowing may also undermine economic growth. The reports also mentioned that the central bank allows a significant increase in interest rates periodically. Then the next step will be the re-injection of cash to ease the credit crunch.

“Money Shortage” in China Leads to Worldwide Attention | InvestmentWatch
 
uh...ummm...wait till the chi bots get off their holidays (government doesn't pay on holidays so they dont post much) and they''ll reassure the continual government injections of fresh cash to the banks that are most expossed to non performing loans due to overinvestment/bad investment on the part of the loan taker (often state apparatus/large state owned corporations) is nothing to worry about.
 
NTDTV is Falungong, they hardly have any credibility.

News is not painting China in any negative light. Simply means that with the recent steps in US, the dollar would go back there. The Chinese bank is simply trying to fill in the void left.
 
Back
Top Bottom