China delivers 6 JF-17 Thunder fighters to Myanmar

[AndrewJin]

But we need Tejas!
Tejas is the best 6th generation baby.

With new Vedic tech, Tejas can be easily upgraded to 8th generation in 2012.

 

[Maxpane]

 

[Imran Khan]

@Roybot is busy telling us that it is China and not Pakistan who sold these aircraft to Myanmar

And here is another bharati lecturing about ummah and all that.

Make up your mind bharatis.

Either Pakistan made these aircraft and betrayed ummah or not.

if pakistan was not involve then why there was news pakistan is gonna cancel the deal

 

[Trango Towers]

The names.

Exactly.

 

[Rajesh Kumar]

Well for all your desperate efforts, try even selling a wheel of the SU-30 to some one.
The mere fact that your MKI fleet is only some 60% operational tells the whole story.

Getting a profit by selling Chinese... Because pakistan done financially contribution for if17 project.

But all technical development and testing done by China and customize as per pakistan and other airforce requirements. Therefore, given TOT transfer to pakistan. Now doing the same job which is we are doing from many years.

We are not getting any profit share if i talk about su30mki because we never done financially help during the Su30 development. But just like if 17, su30mki also customized as per our requirement and we are using Indian made parts just like you also claim.... No difference...

But India doing the same job as pakistan doing with if 17 but difference is that pakistan is eligible to get share profit but we don't.

The open and known fact is that if 17 designed by soviet and technical testing and development done China.

Till now pakistan has not a design or develop a trainer aircraft so no use for talking a fighter aircraft.

 

[LKJ86]

The open and known fact is that if 17 designed by soviet

Which parts are designed by Soviet?

 

[Ultima Thule]

Getting a profit by selling Chinese... Because pakistan done financially contribution for if17 project.

But all technical development and testing done by China and customize as per pakistan and other airforce requirements. Therefore, given TOT transfer to pakistan. Now doing the same job which is we are doing from many years.

We are not getting any profit share if i talk about su30mki because we never done financially help during the Su30 development. But just like if 17, su30mki also customized as per our requirement and we are using Indian made parts just like you also claim.... No difference...

But India doing the same job as pakistan doing with if 17 but difference is that pakistan is eligible to get share profit but we don't.

The open and known fact is that if 17 designed by soviet and technical testing and development done China.

Till now pakistan has not a design or develop a trainer aircraft so no use for talking a fighter aircraft.

We did take a part on R&D and Feasibility phase of JF-17 project, China build JF-17 especially for PAF @Rajesh Kumar

 

[CriticalThought]

You kidding, currently the IAF can't even pay for some construction work on it's runways,

Budget crunch hits IAF's new arms deals, upgrade of airbases

On the western front, the IAF has already been taken to court by contractors involved in runway resurfacing work at Awantipur (J&K) and Chandigarh stations due to non-payment of outstanding bills.

Read more at:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...ofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Hmmm maybe we can look into offering them a Line of Credit if they deposit enough collateral. I think we will have no problem with Jammu and Kashmir as collateral...

Interestingly, soon after the announcement of S-400 deal worth $5.43 billion, the Indian forex reserves fell by $5.14 billion

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...ars-to-394-5-billion/articleshow/66289604.cms

Although the accompanying insight suggests the decline is to support a falling Rupee, one must consider why money loses value: when imports are more than exports.

 

[Ultima Thule]

The open and known fact is that if 17 designed by soviet and technical testing and development done China.

Modified by both countries @Rajesh Kumar

 

[Rajesh Kumar]

Modified by both countries @Rajesh Kumar

I would agree if pakistan developed any aircraft before. Yes, pakistan should had given some technical input as per their requirements and involved during test done by Chinese..

But Chinese were developing more cabable J10 fighter aircraft at same time. So, they don't want fc-1 aircraft. But if Chinese will sell to any country then pakistan is eligible to get share profit

FC -1 (Xiaolong) is developed with pakistan inputs, but all technical development done by Chinese.

 

[kris]

Oh i love the butt hurt on full display by the bewildered Bhartis,

Here are some facts to increase your pain.

Normally Pakistan manufactures 60% off the air frame, while the rest is manufactured in China. Final assembly takes place in Pakistan. In case of Myanmar, the final assembly was done in Chengdu. PAC manufactured its share of 60% air frame and shipped it to China, which assembled its share of 40% and shipped/ferried them to Myanmar.


View attachment 506182

Afaik that's wrt jf-17

Is it same with fc-1 too??

 

[Ultima Thule]

I would agree if pakistan developed any aircraft before. Yes, pakistan should had given some technical input as per their requirements and involved during test done by Chinese..

But Chinese were developing more cabable J10 fighter aircraft at same time.

FC -1 (Xiaolong) is developed with pakistan inputs, but all technical development done by Chinese.

Yes you're right but we did R&D and feasibility studies along with China, at we started the FC-1/JF-17 project there were no R&D facilities at home, we currently building Aerospace industrial base through JF-17 @Rajesh Kumar

 

[Mustang06]

Congratulations. Now we'll have to see how BAF responds as JF 17 is pretty much a generation ahead then any aircraft that BAF can field.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Afaik that's wrt jf-17

Is it same with fc-1 too??

Why your fooling youself its same project name earlier its called FC-1 (1995 to 2000) later its called JF-17 @kris

 

[kris]

So when Ummah screws with Pakistan it's all bad but when Pakistan screws the Ummah it's all kosher? When somebody will sell to Israel to kills Palestinians it's all bad but when Pakistan sells to Myanmar to kill Rohingya it's all good. Double standards anybody?

Unwanted post. Please delete