lcloo
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 3,981
- Reaction score
- 14
- Country
- Location
The engines will be a bigger challenge than the military ones (WS-10, 13, 15, etc.), not technically, but commercially. With military engines, there's only one goal: thrust, all else being secondary. And the military will often accept indigneous products that are slightly inferior to imported ones for the sake of self-reliance. But civilian airliners do not have the self-reliance contraint. They'll not buy it if it does not have the ridiculously low operating cost that's the trademark of Rolls Royce, P&W, & GE.
I predict the WS-118 (high bypass derivative of WS-10) will only see service aboard military types, such as Y-20, and will NEVER be mated to C919.
That is very true. To be a success in building an passenger jet industry (as against building a national passenger aircraft), the popularity of the aircraft among airliners and passengers reign supreme over nationalism. A 100% indigenous design and component passenger jet will never make it. If passengers have no confidence in the aircraft they will go for other airlines, the air liners will not buy the jet, and the builder ended up in big red ink.
Also no body is bulding a national paasenger jet to compete with other countries's national indigenous passenger jet. This situation simply does not exist except in the minds of some vaery nationalistic posters. 100% indigenous civil jets are rare birds, Airbus, Boeing, Bombardier, Embraer jets all have foreign made parts.