What's new

China builds infrastructure for Mansarovar pilgrims

An year back a hindu politician even doubted tht Lord ram ever existed... and why would a hindu lord be born in a buddhist and mongloid region which is a part of China?


LOL politics is politics by friend just google Lord Ram's bridge and see the scientific evidence and because Hindus, Buddhist and Sikhs believe this is the Kaliyuga and Lord Kalki the final avatar of mankind will be born in Tibet as predicted in dharmic text.
 
Kailash-Himalayas-Field.jpg



stunning! and where I would like my ashes scattered

Lake-Mansarovar.jpg
 
Other areas in Tibet are getting more funding, I've been to it twice looking forward in the future as well.
 
During BC era, there was a country called india, or whatever name it may be so that india can claim for inheritance, that rule today's india land??? You have tens of smaller tribal lords that compete for dominance???

Pardon my history about india, when was india an united country??? I was told it was the british that united the india subcontinent. Before them, india was never a united one but several competing warlords, some are bigger and some are smaller, controlled different part of the current india subcontinent.

The first time ever India was united was under King Bharat's rule.
Bharat Empire included the whole territory of the Indian subcontinent, including parts of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, siberia, Turkmenistan, North-west Tibet, Nepal and Bangladesh. let's say around 5,000B.C. The same king who gives India it's name in Indian languages (Bharat).

Then Mauryan dynasty united these territories once again (321 B.C), then Gupta empire, then Mughal empire, then British India.



By the way let's not let thread get hijacked
 
The first time ever India was united was under King Bharat's rule.
Bharat Empire included the whole territory of the Indian subcontinent, including parts of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, siberia, Turkmenistan, North-west Tibet, Nepal and Bangladesh. let's say around 5,000B.C. The same king who gives India it's name in Indian languages (Bharat).

Then Mauryan dynasty united these territories once again (321 B.C), then Gupta empire, then Mughal empire, then British India.



By the way let's not let thread get hijacked

bro dont forget these empires in 1000 BC

File:Devapala.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Devapala in 1000 BC

File:Pala Empire (Dharmapala).gif - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pala in 800 BC

File:Marathas 1758.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and Marathas 1700 AD

File:Maurya Dynasty in 265 BCE.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
300 BC

and ofcourse in recorded indian history under mauryas the biggest ever unification ... they are not showing tibet as part of india because in those days only our sages visited that land and mansarovar was also one of the biggest pilgrimages so you can include tibet as a part of India also...
 
Ok, come and get it... So we can kick your *** again.

Don't worry, it's always ours ... and we'll take it, while you keep kicking at "stars" (in your dreams).

In any case, "we" is in question here.... Mansarover has nothing to do with China; peaceful handover from Tibet is the preferred approach.

It's Tibet which has to solve issues with China .. and that's the first thing.

In fact India and China will have no border issue, once Tibet issue is resolved ... because India doesn't have any border with China (.. since historic times). There is only an Indo-Tibet border, but no India-China border.
 
Don't worry, it's always ours ... and we'll take it, while you keep kicking at "stars" (in your dreams).

In any case, "we" is in question here.... Mansarover has nothing to do with China; peaceful handover from Tibet is the preferred approach.

It's Tibet which has to solve issues with China .. and that's the first thing.

In fact India and China will have no border issue, once Tibet issue is resolved ... because India doesn't have any border with China (.. since historic times). There is only an Indo-Tibet border, but no India-China border.
Historically, only China–British colony border. No China-India border. Think of India, Kashmir, Manipur, Assam, Tamil nadu... They are not India territory. But India took them. So India is so turbulent... Ask CPI,NDFB, sikhs and Muslim.
 
Back
Top Bottom