What's new

Gaza-Israel Conflict | October 2023

.
Screenshot_20240912_071910_LinkedIn.jpg


What these gorkha chaddis don't know is, after the war these murderers will be picked up from their homes like rats and in most of the cases will be killed. Let the dollar fall, and then will begin the hunt..
 
.
Labennon has no means to do anything. Hezbollah has some capability but it seems it is lacking accuracy and range to disable runways or aircraft hangars. Syria does not want to escalate with israel because it is highly damaged from civil war. Also during april strikes of Iran it is said that a large portion of Iranian bms were intercepted by Usa abms. If that is true Iran is lacking in many areas as well. These should be corrected and improved. No need to mention Hamas with a few rockets aimed to win against 400 f16s of israel. That is a problem.

One of the main reasons is I think philosophical mindset. It is the lack of self development, self criticism and self transformation and seeing yourself good enough because you are righteous and waiting from outside to happen with reactionary feelings taking over intelligence. Until mindset changes to everything happens from through you not from outside of you it is hard to solve these problems. That is my take on solution for this part of the mindset problem.
Perfect analysis. I am happy to find another person who looks into the mirror for self correction. 👏
 
. . .
in 1973, Saudi Arabia’s King Faisal stopped oil export of the world in support of Palestine


In 1973, during a period of heightened geopolitical tensions, Saudi Arabia's King Faisal made a momentous decision to halt oil exports as a form of protest against Western support for Israel during the Yom Kippur War. This action was not only a significant moment in the history of oil politics but also a pivotal event that shaped global relations and the economy for decades to come.

The Context of the Oil Embargo​

The Yom Kippur War, which began on October 6, 1973, saw Egypt and Syria launch a surprise attack against Israel. In response to the U.S. decision to supply military aid to Israel, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), led by King Faisal, decided to impose an oil embargo on countries perceived as supporting Israel, including the United States, Canada, the Netherlands, and Japan. This embargo was part of a broader strategy to leverage oil as a political weapon in the Arab-Israeli conflict.

The Immediate Impact​

The embargo had immediate and profound effects on the global economy. Oil prices quadrupled within a few months, leading to fuel shortages and economic turmoil in the affected countries. The United States, which had been heavily reliant on imported oil, faced its first significant energy crisis since World War II. The embargo not only disrupted oil supplies but also forced Western nations to reassess their energy policies and dependency on Middle Eastern oil.

Long-term Consequences​

The 1973 oil crisis marked a turning point in global politics. It highlighted the vulnerability of oil-importing nations and the newfound power of oil-producing countries. The crisis led to a shift in the balance of power in international relations, as oil-rich nations began to assert greater control over their resources and demand higher prices. This period also saw the rise of national oil companies, as many countries sought to reclaim sovereignty over their oil reserves.Despite King Faisal's intentions, the embargo did not achieve its primary objective of forcing Israel to withdraw from occupied territories. The geopolitical landscape remained complex, and tensions continued to simmer in the region. Scholars have debated the effectiveness of the embargo, with some arguing that it failed to change U.S. policy towards Israel while others contend it reshaped the global economic order.

The Legacy of the 1973 Oil Embargo​

The legacy of the 1973 oil embargo continues to resonate today. It serves as a reminder of the intricate relationship between energy resources and international politics. The use of oil as a political tool has been revisited in various contexts, particularly in the wake of conflicts in the Middle East.In recent years, discussions about energy security have resurfaced, especially in light of geopolitical tensions involving major oil-producing nations. The lessons learned from the 1973 crisis have influenced contemporary energy policies, with many countries striving to diversify their energy sources and reduce dependence on oil imports.

Conclusion​

King Faisal's decision to halt oil exports in 1973 was a defining moment that underscored the power of oil in shaping global politics. While it did not achieve its intended goals regarding the Arab-Israeli conflict, the embargo transformed the dynamics of international relations and left an indelible mark on the global economy. As nations navigate the complexities of energy security today, the events of 1973 remain a critical reference point in understanding the interplay between energy resources and geopolitical strategies.

GXPd_ohXAAA2wM5.jpg
 
.
the embargo did not achieve its primary objective of forcing Israel to withdraw from occupied territories. ... Scholars have debated the effectiveness of the embargo, with some arguing that it failed to change U.S. policy towards Israel
Did they have negotiations and demands on behalf of Palestinian rights and statehood? Sounds like it lasted only as long as the Arab-Israeli war and wasn't effective. After the embargo King Faisal made the petro-dollar deal.
 
.
Some sources claim that this projectile took 15 minutes to reach the power plant within Israel.


Israel and Arabs should stop fighting now. I am sure with wars in Ukraine black rock is the biggest winner, and with wars in Middle-east, Indian and China are winning in the background. If it was in my hands, I would stop war in Palestine immediately by two state solution.

Europe and USA should stop funding their own death. These wars are nothing, but white-mans death.
 
.
Did they have negotiations and demands on behalf of Palestinian rights and statehood? Sounds like it lasted only as long as the Arab-Israeli war and wasn't effective. After the embargo King Faisal made the petro-dollar deal.
Current leaderships even cannot think about
 
. .
Current leaderships even cannot think about
Ironically, the embargo made Saudi Arabia and GCC bigger puppets. America agreed to sell advanced weapons to Saudi Arabia which ended the embargo. Prior to it America refused such weapons out of concern for Israel. The other promise was to be more even-handed about Arab-Israel conflict. 'Arab' probably meant Egypt and Jordan mostly. I don't think they ever included Palestinian rights not to be treated as sub-humans which Zionism at its core believes.
 
.
Reminder:
Genesis 21-34 And Abraham stayed in the land of the Philistines for a long time.

Palestinian identity is older than Prophet Abraham. In the other forum, like it used to be here, I see a poster arguing only Jews lived there (who existed many centuries later), so Palestinians should go somewhere else. Crime against humanity.
 
.
She speaks very well.

I don't care about one-state, two-state, three-state, just that Palestinians must have a right to live and work on their entire ancestral land, even if they don't vote there. This applies to anyone whose fundamental identity is tied to their ancestral land, going back thousands of years.
 
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom