China building road inside Bhutan

[Toqe3rAhmad]

u mean collection of millions of Tribes?? .. get a life man...!

And what is Islam?? A collection of tribes and much smaller families. Just because one person became Muslim, he persuaded his whole family to become Muslim.

..

 

[Secur]

And what is Islam?? A collection of tribes and much smaller families. Just because one person became Muslim, he persuaded his whole family to become Muslim.

Unfortunately , that " man " couldn't do so . Please , read some history .

On topic " Is it about the Chicken's Neck ( Silliguri Corridor ) again ?

 

[Springfield]

1.) Saying a person from a nation whose govt. afraid of a unarmed monk?

2.) Bhutan is not china even Tibet is not china but a land occupied by china.

Why are Indians so Hung up about Tibet? Is Tibet not recognised as an integral part of China? Unless India is an aggressive nation lusting after others land.

 

[Anubis]

Good news for Bangladesh if the following deal is signed.

India, Bangladesh set to sign motor pact in trade push | Business Standard

We will establish direct trade route with Nepal,Bhutan and China!

 

[Indo-guy]

Why are Indians so Hung up about Tibet? Is Tibet not recognised as an integral part of China? Unless India is an aggressive nation lusting after others land.

Until Tibetans continue to set afire themselves in protest of Chinese encroachment of their religious freedom ....world will continue to pose questions to China ...just as India faces questions over Kashmir ...and so on !

Just because Tibet is cited in discussion does not mean that India is aggressive nation lusting over other's land ....truth is that in its 5000 year old history India never invaded any country ...


India does not groom Imperial dreams like China !!!


On the other hand why Chinese feel insecure whenever Tibet comes up in discussion ....!!!

 

[Springfield]

Until Tibetans continue to set afire themselves in protest of Chinese encroachment of their religious freedom ....world will continue to pose questions to China ...just as India faces questions over Kashmir ...and so on !

Just because Tibet is cited in discussion does not mean that India is aggressive nation lusting over other's land ....truth is that in its 5000 year old history India never invaded any country ...


India does not groom Imperial dreams like China !!!


On the other hand why Chinese feel insecure whenever Tibet comes up in discussion ....!!!

Not true; India invaded Goa in 1961. Tell me other than standard Indian propaganda; what is Tibet theocracy like 60 years ago.

 

[Tractor]

Tibet should be neglected for it's a real barren land and not like that heaven westerners including some Indians think about.
Chinese don't leave Tibet alone just because something really good southwestward.

 

[Indo-guy]

Not true; India invaded Goa in 1961. Tell me other than standard Indian propaganda; what is Tibet theocracy like 60 years ago.

It's the most laughable assertion on PDF , because if we go by your words India invaded itself !!!

Are you aware of Portugese inquisitions in Goa ? Seems you are not aware ....

You also don't know anything about Goa liberation movement ...

Likes of you who distort History to support your own statement can go any length to that effect !

If India invaded Goa ...why rest of the world kept quite ?

why people of Goa didn't resist ?

Why India doesn't face questions over Goa ' invasion' as China faces over Tibet ?


If you want to cite some examples to argue , then cite those which can withstand test of scrutiny of truth !

Unfortunately you chose very wrong example ....

Any idea why India chose to invade Goa , 16 years after independence ?

If your idea of liberating own people on their very demand constitutes invasion , history of world will be replete with such examples in excess !!!

People of Goa invited and welcomed military action in Goa .


Did any Tibetans welcome China ?


Once again we should not be talking about Tibet or Goa in this thread ....

My apologies if it has got dragged to that effect ...our discussions here should be confined to Bhutan in this particular thread .


Nevertheless we can discuss same in some another thread ...!!!

 

[Springfield]

It's the most laughable assertion on PDF , because if we go by your words India invaded itself !!!

Are you aware of Portugese inquisitions in Goa ? Seems you are not aware ....

You also don't know anything about Goa liberation movement ...

Likes of you who distort History to support your own statement can go any length to that effect !

If India invaded Goa ...why rest of the world kept quite ?

why people of Goa didn't resist ?

Why India doesn't face questions over Goa ' invasion' as China faces over Tibet ?


If you want to cite some examples to argue , then cite those which can withstand test of scrutiny of truth !

Unfortunately you chose very wrong example ....

Any idea why India chose to invade Goa , 16 years after independence ?

If your idea of liberating own people on their very demand constitutes invasion , history of world will be replete with such examples in excess !!!

People of Goa invited and welcomed military action in Goa .


Did any Tibetans welcome China ?


Once again we should not be talking about Tibet or Goa in this thread ....

My apologies if it has got dragged to that effect ...our discussions here should be confined to Bhutan in this particular thread .


Nevertheless we can discuss same in some another thread ...!!!

Baring aside propaganda BS; I like to ask some factual questions:

1. Is the Indian republic today, a successor state of British India?

2. Is Portuguese Goa a successor state of British India?

3. Is the ROC the successor state of Qing dynasty?

4. Is the PRC the successor state of the ROC?

Any other reasons for justifications for intervention in the internal affairs of other sovereign states are just political propaganda/BS; that is my personal opinion.

 

[Screambowl]

they are building it in disputed region. It is alarming

 

[timetravel]

they are building it in disputed region. It is alarming

who controls the disputed region ? PLA or IA or BA?

if it is under control of PLA then its not disputed for me.

Like that we are also building roads in AP and Kashmir. they are also disputed by China and Pak. but I do not think they are disputed as far as India is concerned.

 

[bolo]

In that case, Hong Kong and Macau should have remained with UK-Portugal and not with a much low income country like China.

Chinese per capita income is just three times of India's at present while UK income was more than 40 times greater than that of China in 1991 and more than 60-70 times greater than that of China when Hong Kong was agreed to be returned to China in 1980s.

what makes you think that China with an income just three times greater than that of India at present is better qualified to rule Hong Kong or Macau as both these regions were previously ruled by countries like UK and Portugal with incomes 40-50 times greater than that of China.

Even today people in China do not earn more than 10-12% of what people earn in UK or Hong Kong.

this disparity has been highlighted to your forever but it does not get into your small puny brain. Overdose of friendship with the Muslims is doing all this to you. we all know that China will end expansionism when Maoists are put into jail in China.

and do you want to believe that Bhutan or Tibet or anyone would want to eat dog and cat meat.

Dog meat markets still thriving in China | Farm Press Blog

or make exotic animals like tigers extinct by following a very inhuman cruel ridiculous medicine system.

Tigers and Traditional Chinese Medicine at Tigers in Crisis

The Chinese people will be forever grateful to India if India helps China get rid of Maoists.

sure. im sure UK and Portugal wanted to give back hk and MAcao. uK and Portugal had no choice. China warned Thatcher that they can have 300,000 soldiers in Hk soil within hours. portugal is weak. China did not need to wait til 1999 for macao but they wanted to be fair based on the treaty.

the only thing we thank indians for are your funny, paranoia , lying media. :laughcry

 

[Tshering22]

sure. im sure UK and Portugal wanted to give back hk and MAcao. uK and Portugal had no choice. China warned Thatcher that they can have 300,000 soldiers in Hk soil within hours. portugal is weak. China did not need to wait til 1999 for macao but they wanted to be fair based on the treaty.

the only thing we thank indians for are your funny, paranoia , lying media. :laughcry

Yeah black painting media doesn't make your realities hidden from us who live in bordering states, kiddo.

We know your intentions and we know what is to be done with them. You're only in party period until the elections since that is our apparent weakness.

Too bad you don't understand the value of gentleness and mistake it as a sign of weakness. Many have learnt it sadly.

It is unfortunate to think that our two countries had to choose two opposite sides rather than work together. Your expansionist attitude is only aggravating it.

who controls the disputed region ? PLA or IA or BA?

if it is under control of PLA then its not disputed for me.

Like that we are also building roads in AP and Kashmir. they are also disputed by China and Pak. but I do not think they are disputed as far as India is concerned.

You must understand that a lot of Bhutanese territory has been gobbled inch by inch by PLA and they have been too weak to retaliate thanks to our terminally ill security policy apparatus in the country.

As a result of this, the kink that you see between my state and Bhutan as Chinese, has become Chinese due to slow and steady gobbling of land by PLA and their road building companies.

While on another thread, some members are busy bashing anyone who raises national security concerns as 'fanatic'.

Since Bhutan's security is our concern, we should be addressing it directly. But with this government, even India is in danger, what to talk of Bhutan.

Please understand that PLA 'takes' control slowly when it sees noone is there.

That's the problem and that is exactly what we the people of bordering states have been telling the ******** sitting in Delhi and other fancy metro cities: open your damn eyes.

But them guys just don't listen.

 

[Screambowl]

who controls the disputed region ? PLA or IA or BA?

if it is under control of PLA then its not disputed for me.

Like that we are also building roads in AP and Kashmir. they are also disputed by China and Pak. but I do not think they are disputed as far as India is concerned.

well it is under PLA, but it is disputed. China overruled the 1998 agreement and five principles of peaceful co -existence. We are not building roads in disputed region across LAC or LOC. China and Pakistan do it.