What's new

China, Austria, New Zealand, Turkey, South Africa & Ireland oppose India NSG

mehboobkz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
2,462
Reaction score
-6
Country
India
Location
Singapore
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...-nuclear-export-club/articleshow/52672463.cms

nuclearafp.jpg


VIENNA: China is leading opposition to a push by the United States and other major powers for India to join the main club of countries controlling access to sensitive nuclear technology, diplomats said on Thursday as the group discussed India's membership bid.

Other countries opposing Indian membership of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) include New Zealand, Ireland, Turkey, South Africa and Austria, diplomats said.

The 48-nation NSG aims to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons by restricting the sale of items that can be used to make those arms.

India already enjoys most of the benefits of membership under a 2008 exemption to NSG rules granted to support its nuclear cooperation deal with Washington, even though India has developed atomic weapons and never signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the main global arms control pact.

Opponents argue that granting it membership would further undermine efforts to prevent proliferation. It would also infuriate India's rival Pakistan , which responded to India's membership bid with one of its own and has the backing of its close ally China.

"By bringing India on board, it's a slap in the face of the entire non-proliferation regime," a diplomatic source from one of a handful of countries resisting India's push said on condition of anonymity.

A decision on Indian membership is not expected before an NSG plenary meeting in Seoul on June 20, but diplomats said Washington had been pressuring hold-outs, and Thursday's closed-door meeting was a chance to see how strong opposition is.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry wrote to members asking them "not to block consensus on Indian admission to the NSG" in a letter seen by Reuters and dated Friday.

China, however, showed no sign of backing down from its opposition to India joining unless Pakistan becomes a member. That would be unacceptable to many, given Pakistan's track record -- the father of its nuclear weapons programme sold nuclear secrets to countries including North Korea and Iran .

"China, if anything, is hardening (its position)," another diplomat said.

Most of the hold-outs oppose the idea of admitting a non-NPT state such as India and argue that if it is to be admitted, it should be under criteria that apply equally to all states rather than under a "tailor-made" solution for a U.S. ally.

Mexico's president said on Wednesday his country supports India's membership bid, but one Vienna-based diplomat said it still opposed the idea of it joining under conditions that did not apply equally to all.
 
Even during the NSG waiver diplomatic push Austria, New Zealand, South Africa & Ireland were against India obtaining a NSG waiver.

Turkey was disappointed for USA not offering a similar Nuclear deal to Turkey despite being and NSG and NPT member.

China was China

Interesting to see how USA gets through this.
 
No issues, they can come and vote !

In the end the consensus is what matters, not what individual countries think.
 
Dude, do you even understand what you write?

end the consensus is what matters, not what individual countries think.

China is at the pinnacle of missile R&D, just like the US, so they basically never cared, however, if they already were a member state, they could've slowed down India's progress quite considerably. With India in MTCR, they'll shave-off a good two decades of hard work by "ToT".........

India was lucky, China was not a MTCR member state.
NSG is a different cake though.
 
India wants to sell BrahMos to Vietnam, and wants China to endorse its (India's) NSG membership?

Single digit IQ case here?
 
China is at the pinnacle of missile R&D, just like the US, so they basically never cared, however, if they already were a member state, they could've slowed down India's progress quite considerably. With India in MTCR, they'll shave-off a good two decades of hard work by "ToT".........
India Already has NSG wavier Since It never need.
What was More Important was MTCR Which india Needs to develop It ABM Systems
 
NSG became half joke with inclusion of China and now with inclusion of India it will become a full joke...
Better to rename it..Nuclear Profiltrators Group!
 
India can continue making bilateral deals with the relevant countries. NSG membership will be useful (saves on the amount of diplomacy needed) but not essential.

Canada and Australia are already shipping uranium to India....and more reactors are being developed both indigenous (Thorium FBTR cycle) and in collaboration/import from France, Russia, US etc.

It was Indo-US Nuclear deal that was the real important breakthrough. NSG membership is just icing on the cake....the cake is very good still without it.
 
India can continue making bilateral deals with the relevant countries. NSG membership will be useful (saves on the amount of diplomacy needed) but not essential.

Canada and Australia are already shipping uranium to India....and more reactors are being developed both indigenous (Thorium FBTR cycle) and in collaboration/import from France, Russia, US etc.

It was Indo-US Nuclear deal that was the real important breakthrough. NSG membership is just icing on the cake....the cake is very good still without it.
True, NSG brings nothing to the table other than a badge. India can deal with individual countries on nuke tech. As our economy grows we can deal with losers like SA,Ireland,New zealand and make them pay for it. It is ironic that NSG has China which provides support to North Korea to indulge in all the shenanigans but want to keep out India.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom