China and India will Run the islamic law in their country

[Super Falcon]

I dont understand one thing how hindu will decide the bill of islamic sharia of triple talaq which is not their portfolio of religion

And china want to compitable islam which is in itself is complete

Why not let muslims follow freely tgeir religion than imposing one on them by man made islam

I think this shoukd be stoped it is not matter of govt and countries to dictate a law which is tried and tested china better of look loop holes in their religion and indians should look first themselves

 

[Viny]

I dont understand one thing how hindu will decide the bill of islamic sharia of triple talaq which is not their portfolio of religion

And china want to compitable islam which is in itself is complete

Why not let muslims follow freely tgeir religion than imposing one on them by man made islam

I think this shoukd be stoped it is not matter of govt and countries to dictate a law which is tried and tested china better of look loop holes in their religion and indians should look first themselves

In India, parliament decides on various bills, parliament is not Hindu, Muslim, Christian etc.

And if someone finds the law of land hurting his way of living, he is free to move to which ever part of land or sea he feels comfortable with his way of life. We are already over populous.

 

[Tshering22]

Why not let muslims follow freely tgeir religion than imposing one on them by man made islam

Because Islam is not native to either countries.

When you get to another person's house, you are a guest there.

As a guest, it is polite to abide by the norms of that house.

It is called courtesy.

The same goes for Islam.

It is a native of Saudi Arabia and is alien to the Eastern part of the world.

While there are other countries which have accepted Islam and replaced their own identity with it, we prefer to keep local culture alive.

I would ask our Chinese members here to clearly state this better for their country.

In China, they have a clear distinction between the patriotic Hui muslims and the jihadi type others.

In India, we have a clear distinction of the patriotic Muslims far from the terrorist Wahhabi/Salafist ones.

___________

Norms of Arab society and practises are not normal here; some may be, but most others are not. So the locals are different.

Simple.

 

[Skull and Bones]

Our country, our rule.

 

[Zarvan]

I dont understand one thing how hindu will decide the bill of islamic sharia of triple talaq which is not their portfolio of religion

And china want to compitable islam which is in itself is complete

Why not let muslims follow freely tgeir religion than imposing one on them by man made islam

I think this shoukd be stoped it is not matter of govt and countries to dictate a law which is tried and tested china better of look loop holes in their religion and indians should look first themselves

Both are playing with fire and both will burn if they don't stop this attack on Islam. They are both making life easy for their enemies who just need to exploit this week spot and every thing else will also catch fire.

 

[Sheena1980]

I dont understand one thing how hindu will decide the bill of islamic sharia of triple talaq which is not their portfolio of religion

And china want to compitable islam which is in itself is complete

Why not let muslims follow freely tgeir religion than imposing one on them by man made islam

I think this shoukd be stoped it is not matter of govt and countries to dictate a law which is tried and tested china better of look loop holes in their religion and indians should look first themselves

Muslims won’t decide unless they are told to do the right, by force.

The previous Gov.t’s & Muslim board’s have given a deaf ear to many plea’s especially Muslim women. The media never dared to even report many atrocities committed on women due to pressure & threats from Muslims to kill the journalists & politicians. Most Rapes & crimes committed by Muslim men on Muslim women is hushed up within the community by the Muslim bodies & families.

Triple Talaq practice faced opposition not from RSS or BJP but from Muslim women, some of whom have filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court against the practice, terming it "regressive". The petitioners asked for section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, to be scrapped, describing it as being against Article 14 of the Constitution (equality before the law).

Over 1 million Indian Muslims signed a petition to end instant triple talaq. Most of them are Muslim women with few Muslim men. This petition was started by the Muslim Rashtriya Manch, an Islamic organisation on 13th May 2017. Due to the failure of all Muslim leaders & Muslim bodies, many women had gone to meet PM Modi before he became PM & after. Before the last UP elections again they approached Modi with the petition, they said they will all vote for BJP & make sure most women will vote for the party if he promises Triple Talaq is abolished.

The result of the last UP elections was a shock to all Muslim leaders who contested. Almost all of them lost. Even Assauddin Owaisi considered the biggest Muslim leader lost. His party contested in 40 constituencies & was seen bashing Modi & BJP as usual before election in rallies. And he contested from all majority Muslim population areas with Muslim representative. It was a shock to all Muslim bodies & Owaisi they didn’t even win a single constituency. UP is considered the highest Muslim concentrated state in India.

These leaders are still opposing the ban to save their male ego. Many Muslim women are now coming out in open from the centuries of suppression & even threatening to convert to Hinduism or other religion if Triple Talaq is not abolished.

My question is when all other religions are practicing a normal marriage procedure as per the law & constitution why Muslims have a problem which is only men. And why is Muslim men choosy about few laws of Muslims, why don’t they ask for all Shariah law for Muslims in India, where they are given lashes, hands & heads are chopped, etc. There the law for Muslims are fine, they want the constitutional law. Non Muslims will be very happy to have Shariah law only for Muslims in India if they want. If not such nonsense laws of Muslims need to end. No party or people dared before to even bring up these topics even for discussion. What did these Owaisis, Muslim Parties & leaders do to so many appeals of their women. They should have provided justice. BJP won in these areas without even campaigning. These Muslim leaders are taught a proper lesson by their own women. So you should appreciate & credit Modi & BJP they are standing for the valid rights of Muslim women which they are demanding, we are not imposing

 

[Lincoln]

In India, parliament decides on various bills, parliament is not Hindu, Muslim, Christian etc.

And if someone finds the law of land hurting his way of living, he is free to move to which ever part of land or sea he feels comfortable with his way of life. We are already over populous.

What if he is a native to that land?

 

[Tshering22]

What if he is a native to that land?

Then he needs to adopt to the local customs which have been here since times immemorial.

Not everything that the Arabs do is relevant here.

Both are playing with fire and both will burn if they don't stop this attack on Islam. They are both making life easy for their enemies who just need to exploit this week spot and every thing else will also catch fire.

You have no idea how much impatient the world has become over time with Islam.

It is upto your community leaders to reform the regressive practises and replace it with more practical modern ones.

If Christians, Hindus, Buddhists etc can do it; so can you.

As for enemies of China and India (if you are referring to the west), they surprisingly are no longer enemies when it comes to religious terrorism.

Trump wouldn't mind if China and India remove their gloves and smack jihadis hard both inside their countries and outside.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Nothing will happen. Laws will be made. Laws were made against superstition as well. I still see Hinduism being practiced widely.

 

[Lincoln]

Then he needs to adopt to the local customs which have been here since times immemorial.

Not everything that the Arabs do is relevant here.



You have no idea how much impatient the world has become over time with Islam.

It is upto your community leaders to reform the regressive practises and replace it with more practical modern ones.

If Christians, Hindus, Buddhists etc can do it; so can you.

As for enemies of China and India (if you are referring to the west), they surprisingly are no longer enemies when it comes to religious terrorism.

Trump wouldn't mind if China and India remove their gloves and smack jihadis hard both inside their countries and outside.

The natives can change with time. They can adopt cultures from outside. The fact here is that Muslims form a significant part of Indian population, and they have their own culture whilst being native to the land. They have a right to be able to overlook parts of law which are religiously applicable on them.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Then he needs to adopt to the local customs which have been here since times immemorial.

Not everything that the Arabs do is relevant here.



You have no idea how much impatient the world has become over time with Islam.

It is upto your community leaders to reform the regressive practises and replace it with more practical modern ones.

If Christians, Hindus, Buddhists etc can do it; so can you.

As for enemies of China and India (if you are referring to the west), they surprisingly are no longer enemies when it comes to religious terrorism.

Trump wouldn't mind if China and India remove their gloves and smack jihadis hard both inside their countries and outside.

Not sure if you are a Buddhist.
One word should ring a bell.

Nalanda.

Don't insult our Deen.

 

[Viny]

What if he is a native to that land?

One cannot select his birth place, but for sure can select how and where he wants to live.
Humans have moved lands and seas to find the way of life they want to live.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

The natives can change with time. They can adopt cultures from outside. The fact here is that Muslims form a significant part of Indian population, and they have their own culture whilst being native to the land. They have a right to be able to overlook parts of law which are religiously applicable on them.

And our culture is totally different in almost every way. But we don't require a Hindu or a Buddhists certificate to live here. This land belongs (like all land) to Allah SWT.

 

[Ghessan]

how can you mix culture with religion? people need to grow up here before taking such discussion.

 

[Tshering22]

Not sure if you are a Buddhist.
One word should ring a bell.

Nalanda.

Don't insult our Deen.

And yet Nalanda has been recreated again while Afghan-Pakistani border remains a cesspit.

That's exactly the reason Islam needs to adjust according to the local customs.

This is not your territory; keep your Arab fantasies in Arabia.

And our culture is totally different in almost every way. But we don't require a Hindu or a Buddhists certificate to live here. This land belongs (like all land) to Allah SWT.

True you don't need a certificate from us.

But neither do Buddhists and Hindus need to adjust to Arab practises.


Sharia will remain in Arabia; if it comes here, it will be shown the door.