China and India’s 2,000-year manufacturing reign

[Götterdämmerung]

Are you serious.

Yes, I even sent you a sympathy smiley.

 

[Fattyacids]

Seems the so called Aryan only have so called invasion of India, no other place was invaded when everyone originated from Africa.

Aryan invaded Iran and Indian subcontinent, part of central asia too. (Iran means Land of Aryan)

Aryan invasion was 3500 years ago. Homo Sapiens from Africa was 60,000 years ago, they were cavemen!!!!

Historical facts are facts.

 

[StarCraft_ZT2]

It's meaningless or useless, before the 18th century when industrial evolution started, agricultural industry took the dominance in a society.

 

[Kolaps]

I don't believe the ancient India industrial output.

Can some Indian members here give some evidences of it?

China never existed as a nation in its entire history, it was foreigners like Mongols who united China as a nation.

..............................................................

I can't see China ever existed in the Past. China was not even united between 1911-1949 because warlords had their de-facto territories in different parts of China.

Chinese people was first to be united by Qin and soon followed by Han. That is why we called as the people of Han, or Han Chinese.

The club of Han is always getting bigger, absorbing many people around China.

 

[INDIC]

Aryan invaded Iran and Indian subcontinent, part of central asia too. (Iran means Land of Aryan)

Aryan invasion was 3500 years ago. Homo Sapiens from Africa was 60,000 years ago, they were cavemen!!!!

Historical facts are facts.

That still 2500 years earlier than assimilation of Southern Hans as Hans during Tang Dynasty. There is no proof of invasion, if you have any do share with us. By the time we started calling entire India as Bharata varsha, Han Chinese were still confined to plains of yellow river.

 

[Bhai Zakir]

June 11, 2012 1:09 pm by Andrew Hill

I’m fascinated by the first part in a new FT series on manufacturing, led by our expert Peter Marsh, who has a new book coming out on the topic.

In particular, I love the bar chart in this interactive graphic about the “seven ages of industry“ (click on the “chart” tab when it opens).

As you’ll see, between 1830 and 1870, as output surged, there was a dramatic reordering of the global manufacturing hierarchy, which had been dominated by China and India for the preceding 18 centuries.

My first thought was that if those countries could lose their manufacturing edge so dramatically and so quickly during the 19th century “Age of Science”, there must be a risk that today’s dominant manufacturers, notably the US, will fall away during what Peter dubs the “New Industrial Revolution”. He writes, however, that the balance of power in goods production is altering to the extent that the US and other “high-cost” nations may, if they’re clever, be able to retain their edge:

"This new period has the potential to turn winners into losers and also-rans into champions. It provides high-cost nations with a way back into areas of manufacturing some of them thought they had lost to emerging economies such as China and India".

That said, as the chart shows, China and India are already rebuilding their share of manufacturing output at speed. Who is to say that the 150-200 year period in which the UK, Germany and the US took a global lead in producing things won’t turn out to have been a blip in Asia’s 2,000-year manufacturing hegemony?

China and India’s 2,000-year manufacturing reign | Business blog

1.) As per the chart India's manufacturing only declines after the arrival of Mougals till then we were the top manufacturing nation in the whole world.

2.) And India's manufacturing only risen after centuries under the UPA govt.

The big problem of course, is that there wasn't a nation called "India" one thousand years ago, and no concept of "Indian nationalism" based on such a state.

They are basically comparing the geographic area of what comprises modern-day India. Which would be similar to comparing the geographic region of Europe as a whole.

Then why Great Greek scholar and explorer Megasthenes written his book "Indika" thousand of year ago talking about India.

 

[Fattyacids]

That still 2500 years earlier than assimilation of Southern Hans as Hans during Tang Dynasty. There is no proof of invasion, if you have any do share with us. By the time we started calling entire India as Bharata varsha, Han Chinese were still confined to plains of yellow river.

Feeling frustrated on Valentine's day, now you going to start another re-invention of history again?

1) Han Chinese, north or south, east or west, are Han chinese. We ruled southern part of China and Vietnam since Han dynasty more than 2000 years ago.

2) Aryan are foreign invaders of eastern european origins, the native of south asia are dravidians, they're Australoid. You are were two completely different race with different languages.

Apple and oranges.

Aryans are eye-blues blonde who fought several battles with dravidians. Rig veda made references to these battles. Refer to your own holy scripts

Mythology is not history, save your Bharat crap for your uneducated and low esteem indians. When the first Chinese dynasty was formed more than 3000 over years ago, you don't even have a proper kingdom yet! What bahrat? Kushan, Parthian, Scythian, Greeks, Huns were trampling around indian subcontinent.

Go get your inferiority complex treated. Spare this forum your retarded lies and fabrication of history!

 

[INDIC]

Feeling frustrated on Valentine's day, now you going to start another re-invention of history again?

1) Han Chinese, north or south, east or west, are Han chinese. We ruled southern part of China and Vietnam since Han dynasty more than 2000 years ago.

2) Aryan are foreign invaders of eastern european origins, the native of south asia are dravidians, they're Australoid. You are were two completely different race with different languages.

Apple and oranges.

Aryans are eye-blues blonde who fought several battles with dravidians. Rig veda made references to these battles. Refer to your own holy scripts

Mythology is not history, save your Bharat crap for your uneducated and low esteem indians. When the first Chinese dynasty was formed more than 3000 over years ago, you don't even have a proper kingdom yet! What bahrat? Kushan, Parthian, Scythian, Greeks, Huns were trampling around indian subcontinent.

Go get your inferiority complex treated. Spare this forum your retarded lies and fabrication of history!

Blue eyes? then Hans must be having Green eyes. Certainly the people outside the plain of yellow river aren't original Hans.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Aryan invaded Iran and Indian subcontinent, part of central asia too. (Iran means Land of Aryan)

Aryan invasion was 3500 years ago. Homo Sapiens from Africa was 60,000 years ago, they were cavemen!!!!

Historical facts are facts.

Correction, aryans entered Pakistan punjab 3500 years ago. After 1000 years they started to move towards India 2500 years ago.

Rigid caste system is 2100 years old, for 400 years brahmins were allowed to marry lower caste woman of India. Though vedic aryan didn't practice caste system when they were in Pakistan. It all started by those who moved to ganga and started what we call modern day hindusism which is completly different from vedic era.

 

[Fattyacids]

Blue eyes? then Hans must be having Green eyes. Certainly the people outside the plain of yellow river aren't original Hans.

Blue-eye foreign invaders who gave you Vedic civilization

 

[INDIC]

Mythology is not history, save your Bharat crap for your uneducated and low esteem indians. When the first Chinese dynasty was formed more than 3000 over years ago, you don't even have a proper kingdom yet! What bahrat? Kushan, Parthian, Scythian, Greeks, Huns were trampling around indian subcontinent.

Go get your inferiority complex treated. Spare this forum your retarded lies and fabrication of history!

Bharat varsha was the name of land mass not mythology, by that time your Zhongguo was only confined to plains of yellow rivers.

Blue-eye foreign invaders who gave you Vedic civilization

Bring me some proof.

 

[Fattyacids]

Correction, aryans entered Pakistan punjab 3500 years ago. After 1000 years they started to move towards India 2500 years ago.

Rigid caste system is 2100 years old, for 400 years brahmins were allowed to marry lower caste woman of India. Though vedic aryan didn't practice caste system when they were in Pakistan. It all started by those who moved to ganga and started what we call modern day hindusism which is completly different from vedic era.

Thanks for your correction. Yes, I forgot to make a distinction. Indian history is later than Pakistan. IVC started in Pakistan too.

Absolutely, Vedic has more similarity with Zorotasrian, it doesn't have the barbaric practice of caste system.

 

[INDIC]

1) Han Chinese, north or south, east or west, are Han chinese. We ruled southern part of China and Vietnam since Han dynasty more than 2000 years ago.

Here is your tiny Middle Kingdoms around 350BC.

 

[Fattyacids]

Then why Great Greek scholar and explorer Megasthenes written his book "Indika" thousand of year ago talking about India.

Indika or india refers to geographical area, the Indian subcontinent. There was no empire named India

 

[INDIC]

Indika or india refers to geographical area, the Indian subcontinent. There was no empire named India

Even Herodotus knew about India around 440BC when you had no idea of 'Middle Kingdom' in China.