China and India’s 2,000-year manufacturing reign

[Fattyacids]

Bharat varsha was the name of land mass not mythology, by that time your Zhongguo was only confined to plains of yellow rivers.

Bring me some proof.

You have no kingdom until 2000 years. Earliest Chinese Zhou kingdom precede yours by 1000 years.

All your civilization came from foreign invaders: 1st Aryans, then Islamic rulers, and most recently the British.

Even Herodotus knew about India around 440BC when you had no idea of 'Middle Kingdom' in China.

Because the landmass called indian subcontinent was playground for invaders since Aryan's time

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Thanks for your correction. Yes, I forgot to make a distinction. Indian history is later than Pakistan. IVC started in Pakistan too.

Absolutely, Vedic has more similarity with Zorotasrian, it doesn't have the barbaric practice of caste system.

Yep IVC started near Indus River like all ancient civilization who started near rivers. Harappans also moved towards India later on, infact they also went to Iran and Afghanistan to settle but not many.

 

[INDIC]

You have no kingdom until 2000 years. Earliest Chinese kingdom precede yours by 1000 years.

Which earliest Chinese Kingdom, Had any China existed before so called United China of 221BC of Qin Dynasty.

All your civilization came from foreign invaders: 1st Aryans, then Islamic rulers, and most recently the British.

Because the landmass called indian subcontinent was playground for invaders since Aryan's time

Guess who was building Great Wall of China but couldn't avoid to be ruled by Mongols and Manchus.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Indika or india refers to geographical area, the Indian subcontinent. There was no empire named India

Correct, bringing ancient foreign sources to prove their point shows how pathetic they have become. To much insecurity among Indians. Its like Indonesians claiming IVC, its fucked up. They believe foreign people when it suite them but reject them when it doesnt like Aryans for exemple.

 

[Fattyacids]

Which earliest Chinese Kingdom, Had any China existed before so called United China of 221BC of Qin Dynasty.

UNited CHina was 221 BC, but Han chinese kingdom had been around for thousand of years, even before Aryan gave you civilization

Guess who was building Great Wall of China but couldn't avoid to be ruled by Mongols and Manchus.

Qing are Manchus and Han chinese alliance. They had to adopt chinese culture and governing system, like the Mongols do.

Aryan gave you vedic civilization (only brahmins). Muslims rulers gave you Hindi and persian culture.
And British gave you English and a country called India

 

[INDIC]

UNited CHina was 221 BC, but Han chinese kingdom had been around for thousand of years, even before Aryan gave you civilization

The so many Middle Kingdoms were around Yellow river plain. How can Aryans given civilization to their own descendants. Even it doesn't matter seeing that Southern Hans who spoke some non Sino-Tibetan language were assimilated as Hans only around 10th Century AD.

Qing are Manchus and Han chinese alliance. They had to adopt chinese culture and governing system, like the Mongols do.

Aryan gave you civilization (only brahmins). Muslims rulers gave you Hindi and persian culture.
And British gave your English and created made your country

They were not Hans actually and but they conquered your country after trespassing the Great Wall of China.

 

[Fattyacids]

Correct, bringing ancient foreign sources to prove their point shows how pathetic they have become. To much insecurity among Indians. Its like Indonesians claiming IVC, its fucked up. They believe foreign people when it suite them but reject them when it doesnt like Aryans for exemple.

Not only indonesia and IVC, they claimed Mexicans came from hindu civilization. There a thread on this topic

As if that's not shameless enough, Indians in the US tried to re-invent history too, they attempted to erase Aryan and caste system from textbook

California textbook controversy over Hindu history - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[bolo]

Not only indonesia and IVC, they claimed Mexicans came from hindu civilization. There a thread on this topic

As if that's not shameless enough, Indians in the US tried to re-invent history too, they attempted to erase Aryan and caste system from textbook

California textbook controversy over Hindu history - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Very shameful of them.

 

[Fattyacids]

The so many Middle Kingdoms were around Yellow river plain. How can Aryans given civilization to their own descendants. Even it doesn't matter seeing that Southern Hans who spoke some non Sino-Tibetan language were assimilated as Hans only around 10th Century AD.

All Han chinese carries the same DNA, halogroup 03. Chinese dialects are under sino-tibetan too. We are one race.
You are the descendants of foreign invader Aryans and dravidian women (australoid) . Different races.

They were not Hans actually and but they conquered your country after trespassing the Great Wall of China.

Han chinese are the original stock of not just China, but Korea and japan too

Aryan gave you vedic civilization. Muslims rulers gave you Hindi and persian culture. British gave you English and a country called India

 

[LURKER]

Feeling frustrated on Valentine's day, now you going to start another re-invention of history again?

1) Han Chinese, north or south, east or west, are Han chinese. We ruled southern part of China and Vietnam since Han dynasty more than 2000 years ago.

2) Aryan are foreign invaders of eastern european origins, the native of south asia are dravidians, they're Australoid. You are were two completely different race with different languages.

Apple and oranges.

Aryans are eye-blues blonde who fought several battles with dravidians. Rig veda made references to these battles. Refer to your own holy scripts

Mythology is not history, save your Bharat crap for your uneducated and low esteem indians. When the first Chinese dynasty was formed more than 3000 over years ago, you don't even have a proper kingdom yet! What bahrat? Kushan, Parthian, Scythian, Greeks, Huns were trampling around indian subcontinent.

Go get your inferiority complex treated. Spare this forum your retarded lies and fabrication of history!

Just quote the Rig Veda verse chini boy that claims Aryans were from outisde India and fought Dravidians

 

[INDIC]

All Han chinese carries the same DNA, halogroup 03. Chinese dialects are under sino-tibetan too. We are one race.
You are the descendants of foreign invader Aryans and dravidian women (australoid) . Different races.




Han chinese are the original stock of not just China, but Korea and japan too

Aryan gave you vedic civilization. Muslims rulers gave you Hindi and persian culture. British gave you English and a country called India

Most of your claims are fake, even until 10th century Southern Hans were not Siniticized.

 

[Fattyacids]

Just quote the Rig Veda verse chini boy that claims Aryans were from outisde India and fought Dravidians

Don't know your own veda? Study harder.
Study this too, California textbook controversy over Hindu history - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fortunately, California board didn't approve.

Most of your claims are fake, even until 10th century Southern Hans were not Siniticized.

Han Chinese ruled south of china and vietnam 2000 years ago. Go see what was the culture and language was written in ancient Vietnam. The non-Han Chinese tribes are naturally not chinese, even til today.
We are one race, not aryan vs dravidian.

 

[LURKER]

Don't know your own veda? Study harder.
Study this too, California textbook controversy over Hindu history - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fortunately, California board didn't approve.



Han Chinese ruled south of china and vietnam 2000 years ago. Go see what was the culture and language was written in ancient Vietnam

We are one race, not aryan vs dravidian.

Seriously high IQ chini bot, this is what you have in support of your rant . Just quote the goddam verse in Rigveda which claims Aryans were outsiders and fought "Dravidians".

 

[INDIC]

Han Chinese ruled south of china and vietnam 2000 years ago. Go see what was the culture and language was written in ancient Vietnam
We are one race, not aryan vs dravidian.

Doesn't matter our Indian identity was cleary defined for about 2000 years before Southern Hans started to call themselves as Han people or rather Tang people.

 

[Fattyacids]

Seriously high IQ chini bot, this is what you have in support of your rant . Just quote the goddam verse in Rigveda which claims Aryans were outsiders and fought "Dravidians".

I'm not here to spoon feed you, pls read your own vedas.

Aryans are foreign invaders from Ural region, Sanskrit is the sister language of old Iranian, Avestan, they both traced to Old Slavic These are well documented in any history book.

Doesn't matter our Indian identity was cleary defined for about 2000 years before Southern Hans started to call themselves as Han people or rather Tang people.

Dumb as always. Tang refers to Tang dynasty, not the enthicity or race. These people were descendants of the Tang imperial courts, hence, the title of Tang. Like how some Chinese surname come about.
Chinese identity was formed 4000 years old. Your religion was 2500 years ago Hinduism (not vedic) but your Indian identity was only 67 years ago, after Britain created India.