China and India’s 2,000-year manufacturing reign

[bolo]

Chinese history is very interesting, thoughout history Han people had no idea about the fixed geography of China. The tiny territory along the plains of yellow was also China and the largest created by Manchus was also China.

Displaying your stupidity yet again?

 

[LURKER]

He is not ranting but stating facts with backup. @INDIC is doing you guys a disservice by lying about your history and other country's history to other Indians. You should give him shit for making you guys look bad as a whole.

Couldn't find a single back-up to his facts chini boy. Just asked him to mention the original verse from Rigveda to bacp-up his claim and till now he didn't do it. I know my history full well and i'm not interested in Chinese history.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

Seems you are begging for my attention, snowwhite.

Just exposing your lies aryan bhaye.

 

[Fattyacids]

You mean handful of Han Chinese among non-Han majority population before Tang Dynasty sinticized all of them around 10th century AD.

Retarded logic. these was never an official census, Han Chinese moved around china throughout history. Tang imperial were a prominent group. People came south after Tang dynasty too. Point is we are one people, unlike you who doesn't even have a national identity today 2014

66 years on, an incomplete quest for national identity - Hindustan Times

 

[INDIC]

Han Chinese were in southern china and Vietnam 2000 years ago.Nanyue - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

you saying Nanyue was Han Chinese.

 

[Fattyacids]

Oh..so do you think...California textbook answered every thing,....
it's not concrete ,...so, you cannot say whether they migrated or originated here...

California education board are made up of academic from renowned universities , there are no jingoistic or religious bias unlike many local Indian academics.

Aryans are hailed from Ural region.

you saying Nanyue was Han Chinese.

Nanyue is as Han Chinese as chinese noodles.

 

[INDIC]

Just exposing your lies aryan bhaye.

You actually meant.

 

[Dem!god]

California education board are made up of academic from renowned universities , there are no jingoistic or religious bias unlike many local Indian academics.

Aryans are hailed from Ural region.



Nanyue is as Han Chinese as chinese noodles.

so, some fellow from diff. university will come and say something....
why will I listen to him....
+ they too mentioned it as a controversy.....so, there is no Jingoistic approach here....

 

[INDIC]

Nanyue is as Han Chinese as chinese noodles.

Retarded logic. these was never an official census, Han Chinese moved around china throughout history. Tang imperial were a prominent group. People came south after Tang dynasty too. Point is we are one people, unlike you who doesn't even have a national identity today 2014

This is called denial.

 

[Fattyacids]

Just exposing your lies aryan bhaye.

Indic is the biggest fabricator of history, he has been exposed many times, he got banned twice too. I'm beginning to think he has some psychological issues.

This is called denial.

You described yourself well.66 years on, an incomplete quest for national identity - Hindustan Times

 

[Fattyacids]

so, some fellow from diff. university will come and say something....
why will I listen to him....
+ they too mentioned it as a controversy.....so, there is no Jingoistic approach here....

That was an just illustration. There are many books on South Asian history that documented Aryans. Iran = Land of Aryan. These are supported by archeological and linguistics evidence, the uncanny similarity between Avestan and Sanskrit, and their relation to Old Slavic.

 

[INDIC]

You described yourself well.66 years on, an incomplete quest for national identity - Hindustan Times

Your high IQ! you didn't read the article. Certainly Indian nationalism is stronger than Chinese one which is nothing more than claiming empires of Ming-Qing Dynasties.

 

[Dem!god]

That was an just illustration. There are many books on South Asian history that documented Aryans. Iran = Land of Aryan. These are supported by archeological and linguistics evidence, the uncanny similarity between Avestan and Sanskrit, and their relation to Old Slavic.

Oh...good now you suddenly start believing all this because it is against indian......good going......
why should I believe those biased books...it still to be proven.....

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

That was an just illustration. There are many books on South Asian history that documented Aryans. Iran = Land of Aryan. These are supported by archeological and linguistics evidence, the uncanny similarity between Avestan and Sanskrit, and their relation to Old Slavic.

They believe in out of India theory which is most ridiculous one because of genetic tests. Its pretty clear original Indo-Europeans were bunch of people who moved to different parts of the world. The people who wrote Rig Veda come to Punjab, Pakistan 3500 years ago. And then some of them after living in Pakistan 1000 years moved to India 2500 years ago and gave them what we call "Hindu Civilization" now.

The difference is Indian aryans were the only Indo-Europeans people to implement caste system and slave natives of India. There was no such a thing as Caste system in Vedic times in Punjab, Pakistan and its proven by historical texts.

Aryan caste system and socially mobile Punjabis - DAWN.COM

 

[Fattyacids]

Your high IQ! you didn't read the article. Certainly Indian nationalism is stronger than Chinese one which is nothing more than claiming empires of Ming-Qing Dynasties.

Chinese identity has been forged before Aryan gave you civilization, but you don't even have a national identity today, less than 60% indians support a pan-indianism "Pan-Indianism is an idea is popular (59%)" "There has been an attempt to try to create unity through political identity...." 66 years on, an incomplete quest for national identity - Hindustan Times