2016 to 17 is more for combat maturity of the unit which regiment is build up which means late 2014. Production unit shall have produced the first operations J-20.that is to early, it should be more along the lines of late 2016 to 2017
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2016 to 17 is more for combat maturity of the unit which regiment is build up which means late 2014. Production unit shall have produced the first operations J-20.that is to early, it should be more along the lines of late 2016 to 2017
The J-20 could be as 'iconic' as the Zero? That is going too far. Could be?
The only reason why the Zero is so famous and 'iconic' is because of war. The J-20 is still under testing. What are these Japanese editors/writers smoking? If anything, it should be the F-16 that has achieved 'iconic' status.
J-20 is a big bird, sort of like P-47 or P-51. It is not very maneuverable, but instead relies on speed during dogfights.
The J-20 could be as 'iconic' as the Zero? That is going too far. Could be?
The only reason why the Zero is so famous and 'iconic' is because of war. The J-20 is still under testing. What are these Japanese editors/writers smoking? If anything, it should be the F-16 that has achieved 'iconic' status.
Who tell you that. Japan is a resource limited Country, while China is abundant with Resource. We can design and build any kind of weapon system we think it is necessary .It would be a bad thing, the zero was very lightly armored and easily took fire
The P47 overclassed the zero
Asian culture often priviliege the quickness over the protection
It would be a bad thing, the zero was very lightly armored and easily took fire
The P47 overclassed the zero
Asian culture often priviliege the quickness over the protection
On what technical basis are this comparison made? What similarity is there between A6M and J-20?A6M Zero was good in 1940, but by 1943 it was totally outclassed by F6F Hellcat, the latter having an engine almost twice as powerful as Zero's puny engine. Americans had lots of oil, they could afford big planes. Only A7M Reppu could have taken on US navy fighters toe to toe. J-10 could be compared to A6M while J-20 could be compared to A7M.
He just make shit up...What has this to do with Asian culture???
No technical basis at all.On what technical basis are this comparison made? What similarity is there between A6M and J-20?
It would be a bad thing, the zero was very lightly armored and easily took fire
The P47 overclassed the zero
Asian culture often priviliege the quickness over the protection