Iran will eventually sign sea route security passage treaty with Pakistan.it sure wont be cheap but expensive .... naah as owr goal is to reach central asia and russia for which we have to make a very large trip from arabian see to suez canal to spain to UK from there after passing all the scandinavian countries to russia finally here we could do that by simply sending-bringing merchandise to chahbahar and from there to central asia and russia wia road or train link now tell me will it be expensive for us in the long run ?
S India's policy is regional centric big NO it's only policy revolves around hatred of Pak
That is very true. The problem is Indian's magnify the slightest Iranian concession even if it is a mere formality into some great ground shaking gift of the gods that India has gotten. Then that sends into tailspin simpletons in Pakistan many of whom already have had their brains mushed with Saudi Wahabism.
I believe over $6 billion.
That is very true. The problem is Indian's magnify the slightest Iranian concession even if it is a mere formality into some great ground shaking gift of the gods that India has gotten. Then that sends into tailspin simpletons in Pakistan many of whom already have had their brains mushed with Saudi Wahabism.
I still blame the mullahs in Iran. Mullahs anywhere are bad news and that includes Iran. If only the dynamic of 1970s in the region with RCD (Turkey,Iran,Pakistan) had continued. Today this would have been a mighty great region.
Take this Chah Bahar. Only time will tell how it actually plays out. Like you said this all could be just sill manouvering going on to extract the best from each other. As you mention Israel/USA shadow on India is growing larger. How when both want to destroy Iran will take to India helping Iran will play out time will tell.
I believe over $6 billion.
*In fact all this could be Modi's attempt at increasing stock value in front of Israel and USA by simply trading the Chah Bahar deal against increased US or Israeli favours for dumping the deal.
Go change you nick , before put a ban on you. Typical Indian nick. Before we leash anti indian name calling assault.
Nobody does. Sandal wearing Mullah Omar's Afghanistan even did not do that in 2001 with all the guns pointed on his head. What most sane countries do is accomodate competing interests to best suit themselves. Now does India give ground when the cirumstances are right? Or semantics asides "allow itself to be persuaded? Yes. Prime example below.
There is no rule saying I can't call India "Gandoo-desh or Gandoolander or Gangalander" but you might take offence. We know that prefix (Pork) your using is favourite of Indian's as abusive term for Pakistan when they mix it with the suffix "istan".
Well Indian testicles shrunk more than mine do when I jump into ice cold water. Chinese, Turkish imports remained almost the same. A big two fingers to USA from those countries. India and Japan on other hand jumped higher than each other to please the "uncle". Below graph makes it explicit.
Yes it did. Pakistan did not have the sufficient economic ballast to withstand US pressure. No shame in that. Even our big, six times oversized humongous neighbour India dropped Iranian oil imports. Looks like only Chinese and Turks stood firm.
Well Indian testicles shrunk more than mine do when I jump into ice cold water. Chinese, Turkish imports remained almost the same. A big two fingers to USA from those countries. India and Japan on other hand jumped higher than each other to please the "uncle". Below graph makes it explicit.
Yes it did. Pakistan did not have the sufficient economic ballast to withstand US pressure. No shame in that. Even our big, six times oversized humongous neighbour India dropped Iranian oil imports. Looks like only Chinese are Turks stood firm.
