Dubious
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 37,717
- Reaction score
- 80
- Country
- Location
Yes he can but he shouldnt be asking for them from someone online19, why?
cant a 19 year old eat chips?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes he can but he shouldnt be asking for them from someone online19, why?
cant a 19 year old eat chips?
you are genius bro ty i have more job for u )))))))Sure....
View attachment 198605
pls, Khala is Khala, weather online or offlineYes he can but he shouldnt be asking for them from someone online
Bro, I cant see the picture.you are genius bro ty i have more job for u )))))))
is this question is wrong or it is i who cant handle it ?
@ResurgentIran
There wasn't any arguments for me to counter really. There was mullah fanboys claiming that the clone was superior to its original without any tangible evidence, and there was people like me facing all the insults and personal attacks, because we dare to question the words of the mullahs and refused to believe them blindly. You see, "mullah fanboy" cannot be considered as a personal attack but a simple reality. I mean, we have seen the mullah fanboyism at its purest form in that thread. We are still seeing it. Even those who you claim to be indifferent or hostile to the mullahs, gets frustrated when people state the obvious and say that it is just another stunt.
As for the Erdoganistani donkey, it obviously is not on par with the term "mullah fanboy". Had I refferred to you guys as the Gypsies of Poorsia it might have been fair, but that wasn't the case, so there is no reason for those.
Erdoganistani donkey had nothing to do with race. If I had called you a torke khar or mongol khar, then it would be. But I didnt do that because there is no need for such statement.
I specifically put Erdoganistani infront, meaning you would just be a donkey submissive to Erdoganistani ideology.
Which is ridiculous because I know you wouldnt be that, just the same as pretty much no one that you refer to as "mullah fanboy" is ideologically tied to mullahs, but rather defend Iran's achievements even if you dont agree with them or think they makes sense. Doesnt mean someone is necessarily fan of mullahs.
Mullah has nothing to do with the production of any Iranian defence products, but is the result of ordinary Iranian engineers. Let this concept penetrate your thick Erdoganistani skull.
And seems you dont have control over your own thread either, so you can stop gloating.
Well, those who I refer to as such are the ones who are the fierce supporters of this policy of mullahs which can be called as: "claiming to have technological breakthroughs on a weekly basis". So it doesn't matter how close they feel themselves to the mullahs ideologically. This particular policy of the mullahs happen to adress their nationalist needs, hence even guys like Surenas can fall under that category even though he is known to dislike mullahs, or their policies in general. However, "Iran Strong" rhetoric, regardless from whom it comes from, tend to trigger this urge in these types of people, letting them act like fanboys, blindly believing in anything suggesting that Iran is advancing without needing any tangible proof. Until this point, I have no problem with such peoples. But when this bunch starts to attack those who actually ask questions and demand proofs, which usually is the case with the mullah fanboys, then there is a problem there.
As I said, we have seen it in the purest form in that thread. I basically said, "there is no proof which could suggest that this clone is superior to its original", and the fanboys started with Süleyman Şah tomb and finished with the Armenian claims. I got thread banned on top of that by your mullah mod. That was the reason of that meme by the way.
Now its mullah mod as well... lol you sound like a parrot
By most Iranians and even Turks account, Serpi was/is a good moderator. You are one of few who have a personal problem, leading to your default ad hominem "mullah fanboy/mullah mod".
Stop complaining of personal attacks you when you are no better.
If you think referring anyone as "mullah fanboy" is something that is supposed to be a standard normal thing to do, then I understand why you are bewildered by the fact that you get insults lobbed towards you.
Maybe you need to reassess how you talk to people.
This is PDF mate. If you like to have more formal interactions, there are better choices out there. I explained the reasons why I use it, and why I'm right to use it against certain people. It is not a personal attack but the truth. And yes, it is pretty standard and normal thing to do in PDF, calling fanboys as such.
So by that same token, the insult that you refer to and complain about from your pedestal can also just be dismissed as "this is PDF". Case closed.
I wouldn't mind any insult towards me really. I haven't reported a single post for over 2 years now. What bothers me is the double standards. Banning me from the thread for no reason while allowing those who makes all kinds of insults to continue their thing.
I got tired at the constant attacks by some members at the Virgin Mary,Jesus and their mocking of Christianity and i kind of went overboard with my comments.
Truth be told ,it would have been better if i would have retained my composure.The negative ratings came from a single Indian member.
Any good news,you finished your projects?