911
BANNED
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 2,408
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
Hello there again buddy
But today why this question of Urdu as their national language arises is because the narrative has been changed by Pakistanis and today they argue that their country was actually formed for the people of regions Sindh, Punjab, KP/FATA, Baluchistan and Kashmir. Funny because once they forced Bangladeshis to learn Urdu.
People who are so much concerned about the unity of India and making Hindi as national language should let time take its own course. Because of how much wide spread Bollywood is, Hindi (Hindustani actually) will eventually take over other languages, but it will take a hell lot of time, probably hundreds of years? (Or maybe English will consume Hindi as well)
What majority of people today in India speak is actually Hindustani, not pure Hindi, and I bet Pakistanis can't understand pure Urdu as well, unless did a professional course. There are some differences in vocabulary for sure, so we can safely say both North Indians and Pakistanis speak Indian Hindustani and Pakistani Hindustani (if that makes sense). But because of mixture of English with Hindustani, its actually Hinglishtani ? This amalgamation comes at a cost of not being able to speak proficiently in any of them.
Yes only ~8% of population consider Urdu as their mother tongue in Pakistan. But since almost all of their provinces can now understand or speak Urdu, I don't see why Pakistan can't consider Urdu as their national language.I was surprised to know that only 8% of the Pakistani population speaks Urdu as their mother tongue. As we all know that Urdu is the national language of Pakistan.
Since Urdu was considered language of Muslims of Subcontinent and the fact that Pakistan was created for the Indian Muslims, it didn't get much resistance back then?And there are many other languages that are spoken by higher percentage of people as their mother tongue. So why was Urdu even made the national language of Pakistan even when there were many alternatives left?
But today why this question of Urdu as their national language arises is because the narrative has been changed by Pakistanis and today they argue that their country was actually formed for the people of regions Sindh, Punjab, KP/FATA, Baluchistan and Kashmir. Funny because once they forced Bangladeshis to learn Urdu.
You can't compare the position of Urdu in Pakistan vis-a-vis the position of Hindi in India because unlike Urdu, Hindi in India is not even the second language of many states. And even if people in non Hindi speaking states can speak or understand Hindi unofficially because of Bollywood penetration, they take pride in their own mother tongue.For comparison, Hindi have a much larger percentage of people speaking it as mother tongue in India but still it is not the National language of the nation. Infact, in India, there is no national Language and have only official languages.
People who are so much concerned about the unity of India and making Hindi as national language should let time take its own course. Because of how much wide spread Bollywood is, Hindi (Hindustani actually) will eventually take over other languages, but it will take a hell lot of time, probably hundreds of years? (Or maybe English will consume Hindi as well)
What majority of people today in India speak is actually Hindustani, not pure Hindi, and I bet Pakistanis can't understand pure Urdu as well, unless did a professional course. There are some differences in vocabulary for sure, so we can safely say both North Indians and Pakistanis speak Indian Hindustani and Pakistani Hindustani (if that makes sense). But because of mixture of English with Hindustani, its actually Hinglishtani ? This amalgamation comes at a cost of not being able to speak proficiently in any of them.