Can we really compare Tejas and JF 17 ??? By Indian Aerospace/Defense News

[Etilla]

Why? Ship RCS is far greater and easily detected against sea background. The range of detection for ships is an order of magnitude higher.

Yes but the current radar of Tejas is barely sufficient for air-air we dont know if it even has air-sea mode.

Also which bomb would Tejas use?

 

[IADnews]

If you want to run a good successful and professional blog you would know better than to call Tejas 4.5gen.
You can get plenty of jingoistic people for more likes but then you won't be considered a reliable source.

Just my advice.

I have not called Tejas Gen 4.5 anywhere

@IADnews Can you tell me what is IAD News...I had tried searching it on the web but i didn't found anything related to defence...So sir can you please tell me about this.......

Just search Indian Aerospace/Defense News

 

[Krate M]

Yes but the current MMR radar of Tejas is barely sufficient for air-air we dont know if it even has air-sea mode.

Also which bomb would Tejas use?

1 not bomb, missile. Don't know which one.
2. A2A is more difficult for fighter sized target. Sea based is easier due to bidder target size and lack of background clutter/noise. Radar detection is a function of square of RCS, so detection happens at long range for ships. LCA has A2G mode, so should work for sea.

 

[Storm Force]

We must pretend that this picture below is a fake for the sake of our Pakistani friends

We cannot give the impression that this fighter has achieved IOC 2 and that IAF has started induction.

we cannot talk about the composite full quadruplex airframe or the USA engines and Israeli weapons & radars

data like this makes certain people nervous

.

 

[sancho]

In the LCA versus JF17 comparison as of now 3 advantage that LCA enjoys are

LCA advantages

- reliable and proven engine
- EL 2032 A2G modes
- Litening LDP
- HMS
- WVR missile
- RCS
- EW


LCA disadvantages

- not fully developed yet
- unproven in operational service
- radar performance due to nose issue
- lack of A2A capabilities
- lack of weapon variety
- most likely unit costs

 

[NKVD]

LCA advantages

- reliable and proven engine
- EL 2032 A2G modes
- Litening LDP
- HMS
- WVR missile
- RCS
- EW


LCA disadvantages

- not fully developed yet
- unproven in operational service
- radar performance due to nose issue
- lack of A2A capabilities
- lack of weapon variety
- most likely unit costs

Weapon variety ??

 

[Etilla]

1 not bomb, missile. Don't know which one.
2. A2A is more difficult for fighter sized target. Sea based is easier due to bidder target size and lack of background clutter/noise. Radar detection is a function of square of RCS, so detection happens at long range for ships. LCA has A2G mode, so should work for sea.

Tejas has 45-50km in 5m2 air to air range.

So 75 for sea target? Would it be good for AShM?

Considering our Jaguars have 300km Air to Sea range

 

[Luftwaffe]

We cannot give the impression that this fighter has achieved IOC 2 and that IAF has started induction.

we cannot talk about the composite full quadruplex airframe or the USA engines and Israeli weapons & radars

data like this makes certain people nervous

.

LCA image doesn't make PAF/common Pakistanis nervous...you people already talked about LCA with a thread running in Indian section freedom of speech achieve why blame PDF? Nobody is nervous RD93 is proven engine and is in effective use by PAF but it did make indians nervous when PAF procured with No objection by russian was it you people bashing Russia...good for you people to get off the shelve weapons/radar/engine since india is too slow in its projects may be it is time india feels ashamed to not use made in india 99% in LCA as for Pakistan due to our poor economy we'll continue to import certain products for US/China/Russia to keep things operational and on part with world nothing to be ashamed of but in case of india it should matter with big budgets hindustan still can't achieve targets or in time or produce.

 

[Etilla]

LCA advantages

- reliable and proven engine
- EL 2032 A2G modes
- Litening LDP
- HMS
- WVR missile
- RCS
- EW


LCA disadvantages

- not fully developed yet
- unproven in operational service
- radar performance due to nose issue
- lack of A2A capabilities
- lack of weapon variety
- most likely unit costs

EL 2032 A2G modes?

Tejas has DRDO pulse doppler radar so how can it use A2G modes of a different radar?

LCA image doesn't make PAF/common Pakistanis nervous...you people already talked about LCA with a thread running in Indian section freedom of speech achieve why blame PDF? Nobody is nervous RD93 is proven engine and is in effective use by PAF but it did make indians nervous when PAF procured with No objection by russian was it you people bashing Russia...good for you people to get off the shelve weapons/radar/engine since india is too slow in its projects may be it is time india feels ashamed to not use made in india 99% in LCA as for Pakistan due to our poor economy we'll continue to import certain products for US/China/Russia to keep things operational and on part with world nothing to be ashamed of but in case of india it should matter with big budgets hindustan still can't achieve targets or in time or produce.

Prevention is better than cure.

Rather prevent you from getting the equipment than having to "cure" take it down

 

[sancho]

Weapon variety ??

LGBs vs LGB, PGMs, anti ship, anti radiation and stand off weapons => clear disadvantage for LCA

 

[Etilla]

We must pretend that this picture below is a fake for the sake of our Pakistani friends

We cannot give the impression that this fighter has achieved IOC 2 and that IAF has started induction.

we cannot talk about the composite full quadruplex airframe or the USA engines and Israeli weapons & radars

data like this makes certain people nervous

.

Sir which Israeli weapons & radars exactly?

 

[sancho]

EL 2032 A2G modes?

Tejas has DRDO pulse doppler radar so how can it use A2G modes of a different radar?

Because DRDO failed to develop a proper radar, now most of it is Israeli origin, which however makes the fighter more capable, if we solve the nose problem.

 

[TimeTraveller]

Just search Indian Aerospace/Defense News

Ok Thanks Sir...

 

[Luftwaffe]

Prevention is better than cure.

Rather prevent you from getting the equipment than having to "cure" take it down

prevent by whom? agreeable poor economy is the main cause for PAF to get the best but it did get some best stuff from US and is under process of getting best european technologies direct indirect by Turkey. During high times PAD got F-16 deal nobody prevent us even French offered Rafale throw money get what you want from the best source like US/Euro in case of Pakistan but eventually it would be far better to slowly self develop.

 

[gslv mk3]

- lack of weapon variety
- most likely unit costs

Both these would remain as its disadvantages through out its service life

we'll continue to import certain products for US/China/Russia to keep things operational and on part with world nothing to be ashamed of but in case of india it should matter with big budgets hindustan still can't achieve targets or in time or produce.

Big budgets ? Compared to whom ?