Wow....The only difference b/w Pakistanis and Indians is former don't argue who win nuclear war because everyone will lose....
Every nuclear power know that a nuclear war could be fought and won under various circumstances; even when there are thousands of nukes involved. Reagan administration envisioned defence against 80,000 Soviet nukes, let alone 200 which is maximum that Pakistan could possess as it does not have fissile material supply for more.
And LOL NO! Everyone would not lose. Read post #40. You are overestimating power of nuclear bombs. The type which you have ,even if they all reach their target, would not even kill 1% of population of India.
These are highly sophisticated nukes unlike those dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki..
Yield is Yield. It is final energy output, not initial estimates.
Little boy has yield of 15Kt ,and Fat man of 22. It is near equal to average yield of Pakistani bombs.
If you're that confident regarding your safety from our nukes....Please I beg you to start war...It'll be fun, they say, it'll be fun.
Why should we?
Every year, India improves upon its BMD, produces even more interceptor missiles, and buy foreign BMDs, while technology associated with Pakistani nukes is stagnant, and number of nukes Pakistan could have is limited.
So why should we start a war today, when doing so tomorrow would be better?
Enjoy our tactical nukes (for your army) and conventional nukes (for your civilians) at same time.....Happy ending.....
We do not have problem with your tactical nukes. More fissile material you waste on tactical nukes, less you have for strategic nukes.
Experiments done by USA found that a tac-nuke could only take out 13 enemy tanks. It was their uselessness which led to their eventual obsolescence.
It is great fun and proud feeling when you go out of your way to hurt the enemy 5 times bigger in area and resources. Pakistanis will show you how it will be done. Pakistan is not that wide, if one looks at map, so if India launch nukes on us, your own states will get affect and radiated but if we launch nukes, your country is so wide and deep that radiations of our nukes won't affect us. U are at total lost when it comes to nuke war. U will lose everything 5 times more than Pakistan. Being smaller has its own advantages.
The word you are searching for is fallout.
Read post #40. The types of nukes India or Pakistan has does not cause fallout, and direct radiation does not even affect people two kilometer away from ground zero
Your BMD may let feel you secure and increase cost for Pakistan but if shit hits the fan, you hope it won't, we will steam roll you with everything we got in our inventory...Lets see how you save your ***.
HA!HA!HA!HA!!!
Midless rants without any application of logic. Pakistani ho to aukkat pe to utarne hi thee.
There is no way you could get through a fully functional BMD. You simply do not have enough resources. Even if BMD does not work 100%, you simply would never have enough nukes (due to lack of fissile material) that you could afford most of them to be intercepted in air.