What's new

Build a Temple or a Gurudwara in place of Akbarabadi mosque:Hindu Mahasabha

Everything depends on ASI results & verdict of Judicial system should be final. Hope Congress will not use this issue as a leverage to increase its Vote Bank bullying Hindu feelings creating communal tensions.....

Even if the ASI finds out that there was a Mosque there once upon a time....will it justify the cancellation of the Metro work??.......
For common people's convenience which one is more important....a Metro OR a Mosque??
The Indian govt. will obviously go with the Mosque....as to them 'secularism' means giving in to the Muslim demands even if it conflicts with National interest....

BUT, surprisingly, their right wing attitude changes to left wing when dealing with the Hindus...
They never Hesitate to demolish Temples if they come in the way of development.....
1000-year old Temple demolition in the guise of development

BUT forget about demolishing an existing Mosque, even for non-existent/imaginary Mosques like this one, the govt. developmental work had to be stopped......and what is most alarming is that initially no-one objected....not-even the govt......they turned a blind eye to the illegal construction work of the Mosque on govt. project site...... until the The Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha filed an intervening application in the case and sought the removal of construction at the site......

Now, you may say that The Hindu organization had their own evil extremist Hindu intentions behind filing the petition BUT you can't deny that for them, at-least the illegal construction of the Mosque on gov't project site is halted while our 'secular', 'liberal' govt. was ready to sacrifice National Interest in the name of 'secularism' which the COURT didn't find very secular and ordered the construction of the Mosque to be halted....

Ban construction near Akbarabadi Masjid site, ASI to court - Hindustan Times


Hindu 'extremism' is the reason why India is still 'secular'....
 
.
Tejo Mahalaya....you also jump after reading (or just hearing of it) books by P N OAK (joke is better).

Go...read his book and if you something called brain you will understand how stupid logic he has given.....BTW Oak is the same person who claimed Christianiti came from Krishna Niti; Vatican from Sanskrit Vatika.....Kabba, Westminister abbey were Hindu temples......and so on...
He never was a historian just fanboys like you make him one...

And to add on to it, he was a member of Hindu Mahasabha. that same sect which was responsible for our partition.
 
.
You are no different from raja pakistani, he hates hindus and you hate muslims.

How stupid of you to speak on my behalf that i hate hindus when you dont even know anythinh about.me. Where did i said i hate hindus or you got it in your dream..yea i hate only those extremist hindus who still live in past and make everything as hindu vs muslim conflict..

2. ek dhakka aur do babar ki aulaad ko

Babar ki aulad..woo kon ha .,.:D
 
.
Babar ki aulad..woo kon ha .,.:D

Arre its all bout Baburnaama. He has written some **** about Hindoos. Thats what actually acts as a catalyst for Extrimist in India to get anti-muslim coz thats what they believe an indian muslims' mentality is.
 
.
I am not denying their wrong things or injustice if they did it in past . I was saying that it is irrelevant to relate what mughuls did with present days muslims in India or even in Pakistan because these invaders did that without getting permission of Indian muslims . Mughuls have gone long time ago but Indian Muslims are still living side by side with you..either take revenge from them for what Muslims invaders did or let them live peacefully..choice is yours

Atlast a sane post from you --

What you said is true for the most part, that the Mughals did not take any permission from the Muslims to demolish our most sacred temples and build mosques atop them and hence Muslims of today cant be held responsible for that. I.e., the muslims who dont claim themselves as the cultural legatees of the Mughals or those who dont hark that 'they' ruled this land for a 1000 years...

Now coming to the structures themselves, since they were built atop temples after demolishing them and today's Muslims had nothing to do with those wanton acts of destruction, I dont see what is wrong in Hindus getting back atleast their most sacred spots back with alternate arrangements being made for the Muslim places of worship. And I'm sure the reasonable among the Muslims would agree with that proposition which would go a long way in giving a sense of closure to the majority of the population.

Anyway I think this is an internal matter of India and you Paks need not be worried about that.

Arre its all bout Baburnaama. He has written some **** about Hindoos. Thats what actually acts as a catalyst for Extrimist in India to get anti-muslim coz thats what they believe an indian muslims' mentality is.

Babur nama has equal **** about Pathans also....ironic that the Pakistanis keep names of him for their missiles..:lol:
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom