So why you don't destroy taj mahal and build that spell-binding Hindu architectures again
Taj Mahal was a hindu temple until muslim invaders came and spread islam.
Taj Mahal - A Hindu Temple-Palace
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why you don't destroy taj mahal and build that spell-binding Hindu architectures again
The reign of Aurangzeb was particularly brutal. No aspect of Aurangzeb's reign is more cited - or more controversial - than the numerous desecrations and even the destruction of Hindu temples. Aurangzeb banned Diwali, placed a jizya (tax) on non-Muslims and martyred the ninth Sikh guru Tegh Bahadur.
During his reign, tens of thousands of temples were desecrated: their facades and interiors were defaced and their murtis (divine images) looted. In many cases, temples were destroyed entirely; in numerous instances mosques were built on their foundations, sometimes using the same stones. Among the temples Aurangzeb destroyed were two that are most sacred to Hindus, in Varanasi and Mathura. In both cases, he had large mosques built on the sites.The Kesava Deo temple in Mathura, marked the place that Hindus believe was the birth place of Shri Krishna. In 1661 Aurangzeb ordered the demolition of the temple, and constructed the Katra Masjid mosque. Traces of the ancient Hindu temple can be seen from the back of the mosque. Aurangzeb also destroyed what was the most famous temple in Varanasi- the Vishwanath Temple. The temple had changed its location over the years, but in 1585 Akbar had authorized its location at Gyan Vapi. Aurangzeb ordered its demolition in 1669 and constructed a mosque on the site, whose minarets stand 71 metres above the Ganges. Traces of the old temple can be seen behind the mosque. Centuries later, emotional debate about these wanton acts of cultural desecration continues. Aurangzeb also destroyed the Somnath temple in 1706.
Hindu nationalists claim that Mughals destroyed the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, located at the birthplace of Rama, and built the Babri Masjid on the holy site, which has since been a source of tension between the Hindu and Muslim communities.
Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilizations , Islamic rule in India as a "colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalement, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves."
And if anyone still dare to say that Muslims were persecuted,let them see this. We will see what they have to say after reading this. And our Muslim elders say this was the Ganga Jamuni tajeeb in Varanasi. They only destroyed our top two religious temple & other numerous temple. Still we didn't touch their religious site. Babri Mosque was built upon some type of structure. Muslim in India claim it was plain land. While 1(Muslim) of the 3 judges in high court said there was indeed a structure which was destroyed but he didn't name it. If you people still want to rant,keep it going,nothing changes. That was the only time when Hindus attacked a mosque for religious region if I am not wrong.
Are not we getting more replies from followers of hindu talib bal thakrey now same approach as those of talibaan
Taj mahal is not mosque and its stupid people comparing it with tempels. Dont you guys care about sensibilities of fellow indian muslim when you talk about destruction of mosques and which mosque in india created terrorists..shame on your mentality
Are not we getting more replies from followers of hindu talib bal thakrey now same approach as those of talibaan
Taj mahal is not mosque and its stupid people comparing it with tempels. Dont you guys care about sensibilities of fellow indian muslim when you talk about destruction of mosques and which mosque in india created terrorists..shame on your mentality
raja sahab when you argue against internet hindus you will see that they can goo too soo many low lengths just to undermine muslims. what i dont understand is india has soo much injustice in his country soo many cases still not finished concentrating on this would be extremely unfair to those guys who are suffering due to late justice and stuff now many internet hindus will say they are happy to suffer or should suffer to protect hindu indentity in india but i think a secular country would consider that wrong.....
india is a secular country and many are proud of it they are happy that their country is oo colorful with many religions in it the sign of mosque,s churches gurdwara,s temples show that different religions can coexist in a same place and apparently men of bal thackery on the net want to destroy it to satisfy their own hunger well i say go ahead break taj mahal too and show that there is no difference between the taliban and indians.....
when the taliban stook over swat they destroyed soo many ancient buddhist artifacts they acted like wild extremist animals and same in afghanistan so do that and show that you are hindu talibans
Are not we getting more replies from followers of hindu talib bal thakrey now same approach as those of talibaan
Taj mahal is not mosque and its stupid people comparing it with tempels. Dont you guys care about sensibilities of fellow indian muslim when you talk about destruction of mosques and which mosque in india created terrorists..shame on your mentality
^^ What does your signature mean ?
Get your facts straight and see my earlier post.
Taj Mahal was a Shiv Mandir in Agra called Tejo Mahalaya.
the only taliban here is Matia Mahal MLA Shoaib Malik who went and tried making a mosque over a former Pandav era temple.
Those invaders or kings whatever we call them, mostly had a tendency to demolish temples. I wonder what our neighbours think about this (I am sure they will try to defend themselves by citing the single example of Babri Masjid, in reply to scores of temples destroyed by invaders).
What we think about something happened century ago is irrelevant now. Again there is also no use of you to cry over split milk.
If what you said is true then why you(your ancestors) did not stop them or fight with them when they were destroying temple or were building mosques/mahal or when they were taking over all your precious jewels? Blame yourself if you were coward or weak to not defend your temple or jewels from invaders or you wish to take the revenge of those invaders from fellows Indian Muslims..
Whether there were temples in place of Taj mahal or babri mosque is history but taj mahal is present. Better live in present instead of past or another option(as said before) is to wipe out these taj mahal and everything Mughuls, persians and English built in india and try to rebuild again what was there before invaders ..choice is your but stop making fun of yourself by creating such stupid posts
Tejo Mahalaya....you also jump after reading (or just hearing of it) books by P N OAK (joke is better).
Go...read his book and if you something called brain you will understand how stupid logic he has given.....BTW Oak is the same person who claimed Christianiti came from Krishna Niti; Vatican from Sanskrit Vatika.....Kabba, Westminister abbey were Hindu temples......and so on...
He never was a historian just fanboys like you make him one...
What we think about something happened century ago is irrelevant now. Again there is also no use of you to cry over split milk.