Pakistani E
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 8, 2013
- Messages
- 7,059
- Reaction score
- 27
- Country
- Location
UKIP have a Pakistani MEP.
And EDL has Abdus Salam. What's your point?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
UKIP have a Pakistani MEP.
Ok, so what you were before 1947? British Pakistani? Absurd logic but I dont expect much from Kids. I expected a genuine response from any seniors. Lets wait if they come back.Pakistan consists of and is land of balochis, pakthuns, Panjabis, Sindhis and Kashmiris. These Pakistanis participated in that world war. And by the way if current india and Pakistan were once under british rule then that doesn't means that we were british indians and also it doesn't change our identity as well.
What about this one:Bro you missed one, Pakisaurus--- a dinosaur specie which was once inhabited in area which is now Pakistan
Ok, so what you were before 1947? British Pakistani? Absurd logic but I dont expect much from Kids. I expected a genuine response from any seniors. Lets wait if they come back.
Ok, so what you were before 1947? British Pakistani? Absurd logic but I dont expect much from Kids. I expected a genuine response from any seniors. Lets wait if they come back.
Ok, so what you were before 1947? British Pakistani? Absurd logic but I dont expect much from Kids. I expected a genuine response from any seniors. Lets wait if they come back.
no, there was no pakistan before 1947. There were sindhis, baluchis and kashmiris agreed but not a single one was pakistani. The soldiers who fought in WW1 and WW2 were british Indians. They were part of british India army.Uncle!! As I said earlier that Pakistan is land of balochis, pakthuns, kashmiris ,Sindhis and panjabis. And uncle! these Pakistani people (balochis, pakthuns and etc) were inhabited here even before british and in fact they have been here for thousands of years. We are all locals to our land and this british raj of 90 years don't change our identity.
You are again an Idiot of a class. While you started on better note, You went ahead as full retard. I just asked a genuine question that it is kind of weird that they recognize WW1 Soldiers as Pakistani which doesn't exist by this name so how they were categorizing specifically. Now tell me if a Muhajir fought as Soldier what will be he considered?These men were from the frontier provinces (what is now Pakistan)... These men latter joined Pak army when the british army was divided between india and Pak.. They were born,lived and died in Pakistani soil and served Pak..
It's utterly pathetic that insecure kids from india can't even digest honest fuking facts.. Do you see us claiming anything indian? For fks sakes change your mentality..
India gate was build by brits to ackowledge their war heros(in british indian army), we did not build it.Well if you think so, alright. I just wanted to know about about any monument which was constructed to acknowledge the sacrifice made by these bravehearts.
from India's side (not sure about other asian / african nations).. as a country, we dont feel any pride that Indians were involved in WW1 or WW2. Although not exactly like Irish, but still nobody takes pride.Until recently there was a racial bias in the honour of Commonwealth soldiers with Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa being the only ones honoured. Unfortunately it has now gone too far the other way and now the contributions from Australia and New Zealand are increasingly being ignored in favour of those from Africa and Asia. We should honour everybody and not have any bias.
A good gesture from the British govt, to recognise Pakistani contribution in both world wars.
no, there was no pakistan before 1947. There were sindhis, baluchis and kashmiris agreed but not a single one was pakistani. The soldiers who fought in WW1 and WW2 were british Indians. They were part of british India army.
no, there was no pakistan before 1947. There were sindhis, baluchis and kashmiris agreed but not a single one was pakistani. The soldiers who fought in WW1 and WW2 were british Indians. They were part of british India army.
You are again an Idiot of a class. While you started on better note, You went ahead as full retard. I just asked a genuine question that it is kind of weird that they recognize WW1 Soldiers as Pakistani which doesn't exist by this name so how they were categorizing specifically. Now tell me if a Muhajir fought as Soldier what will be he considered?