BRICS Summit: Why China and Russia did not name Pakistan

[scionoftheindus]

yes. atleast they teach the truth.

OK..no arguments then

 

[Muhammad Raza Mohaiuddin]

India did not name Pakistan either.

We ensured we got a consensus on terrorism in general.

Where is Pakistan in any of those quotes?

The fact is we got a consensus that terrorism should be rooted out, regardless of who is doing it. That's what we were aiming for.

India did not name Pakistan either.

We ensured we got a consensus on terrorism in general.

Khisyaani billi khamba nochay

Neither India named Pakistan

 

[Abba_Dabba_Jabba]

Pakistanis reaction :

1. When called "Pakistan is Mothership of terrorism" : "Sh!t !! this Modi"

2. When no one even called its name : "Yes v r ignored on international forums"

 

[Srinivas]

India do not need any ones acknowledgement nor support , India acts on its own strategic interests!
Neighter we care any one's objections or vetos.

 

[cocomo]

India do not need any ones acknowledgement nor support , India acts on its own strategic interests!
Neighter we care any one's objections or vetos.

If you really don't care for world opinion and support then why has India raised terrorism from Pakistan at every multilateral platform since Uri attacks and called for collective effort to isolate Pakistan?

 

[Mentee]

Was that taught in your madarsa inspired schools?

1/3 of madrassas here and many in Egypt and Bangladesh ( nurturing extremist ideology like their Hindu r.s.s counterparts) are mentored by their H.Q in India right under the nose of Indian govt. Which in return gets political support from that H.Q's following .(the mother ship of all extremist ideologies from ikhwan to Alqaeda)

 

[Musafir117]

India do not need any ones acknowledgement nor support , India acts on its own strategic interests!
Neighter we care any one's objections or vetos.

Than stop crying like a biiiiiiiiia。。。h

 

[Hakikat ve Hikmet]

Russian now realize that Pakistan is good option to blackmail India

china is our 1st and fast friend

A very good observation. Even after sending troops for exercise within Pak while the Indian PM is spending time at the "ops room" if Russia can bag billions of dollars of deals, what'll happen when she ups her bates???

 

[cocomo]

Not again! Did the author produced this part out of his *** or what? If China is quietly counselling Pakistan than how does the author know about it?

 

[kabooter_maila]

While Modi was disgustingly throwing up on the tables in BRICS meeting, Pakistan was busy forging new links with Iran through the CPEC infrastructure. Now that Chinese ambassador has also invited Iran into the project, the region, as expected, will see enhanced integration, trade, investment, and development. Modi's guests ran away from India without any fanfare and in bad taste due to Modi's vomiting and venom spewing, Pakistan is rapidly advancing and consolidating its bonds with regional countries. World is laughing at the idiot jokers across out eastern border while world leaders recognizing NS as a leader with vision. Jokers across the border are falling to disgrace due to their non-stop lies but these idiots are dancing like brainless monkeys for their imaginary diplomatic success, 'Sir Ji Kal' strikes, and other non-sense claims.

 

[Super Falcon]

Modi same radio starts in every summit and meeting like pre recorded juice selling at sea for customers

I wonder why Putin running away from modi in pic

World leaders are discussing whenever they see modi coming their way

 

[Srinivas]

If you really don't care for world opinion and support then why has India raised terrorism from Pakistan at every multilateral platform since Uri attacks and called for collective effort to isolate Pakistan?

India raised the issue because we wanted to tell the world what we are facing for decades.

We are not expecting acknowledgement or support in return, if support comes it is well and good if not we have no issues.

 

[cirr]

You guys should know that the biggest source of terrorism on this planet sits on the east shore of the Pacific.

 

[Thorough Pro]

LOL, sour grapes

India did not name Pakistan either.

We ensured we got a consensus on terrorism in general.

 

[Kaniska]

P'M Modi has just been delivered an unhappy lesson at the just-concluded BRICS summit in Goa: though nine-tenths of geopolitics is about bluff, the critical one-tenth is about knowing when to fold.


Written by Praveen Swami | New Delhi | Updated: October 17, 2016 6:44 pm

Russian President Vladimir Putin, PM Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping. (File Photo)


In 1216, Genghis Khan sent envoys to Samarkand, the capital of Ala ad-Din Muhammad II, Emperor of Khwarezm, bearing gifts of gold, jade, ivory and cloaks spun from the hair of white camels. “I know your power and the vast extent of your empire”, his letter read, “and I regard you as my most cherished son. For your part, you must know that I have conquered China and all the Turkish nations north of it; my country is an anthill of soldiers and a mine of silver, and I have no need of other lands. Therefore, I believe I have we have an equal interest in encouraging trade between our lands”.


The imperial consensus was that Genghis Khan’s forces were too stretched to pose a threat—and Muhammad II decided to show the Khan what he thought of his peace offering. In 1218, the Khwarezm Shah killed 450 Mongol merchants, following it up with the execution of an ambassador.

Less than two years later, the Khwarezm disintegrated in the face of the Mongol assault. Genghis Khan, proclaiming himself “the flail of god”, built towers outside Samarkand’s walls with the skulls of his enemies.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has just been delivered an unhappy lesson at the just-concluded BRICS summit in Goa: though nine-tenths of geopolitics is about bluff, the critical one-tenth is about knowing when to fold.

The Prime Minister proclaimed, in his closing statement at the summit, that BRICS member-states were “agreed that those who nurture, shelter, support and sponsor such forces of violence and terror are as much a threat to us as the terrorists themselves”. The BRICS 109 paragraph summit declaration, however, doesn’t have a single sentence reflecting this purported consensus—not even the words “nurture”, “shelter” or “sponsor”.

Worse, from India’s optic, the summit declaration calls for action against all United Nations-designated terrorist organisations which include the Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammad but names only the Islamic State and al-Qaeda’s proxy, Jabhat al-Nusra—both threats to China and Russia but not to India.


China’s President Xi Jinping, said success against terrorism made it imperative to “addresses both symptoms and root causes”—a stock-phrase Islamabad often uses to refer to the conflict over Kashmir. Russian President Vladimir Putin made no mention of terrorism emanating from Pakistan at all.

Add to this, the United States’ studied refusal to be drawn into harsh action against Pakistan and there’s a simple lesson to be drawn: less than a month after it began, the Prime Minister’s campaign to isolate Pakistan is not gaining momentum.

No one seriously disputes New Delhi’s right to punish cross border-terrorism—even Pakistan’s best-friend China offered no reproach when India struck across the Line of Control, and has been quietly counselling Pakistan to get its house-jihadists under control. However, there’s a big difference between quite counsel and public censure; Pakistan is far too useful to all the world’s big powers in a number of ways.

For one, both China and Russia, as well as Iran, see Pakistan as a potential ally in their anti-jihadist game. The Islamic State and al-Qaeda, now being slowly choked in Syria and Iraq, are likely to divert a significant portion of the resources to Afghanistan as the war against them proceeds. That means numbers of Uighur and Russian Muslim jihadists could be located close to their homelands’ borders. Beijing and Moscow will then need Islamabad’s cooperation.

Interestingly, both countries have already expanded their covert outreach to the Afghan Taliban, seeing them—rightly or wrongly—as a counterweight to the Islamic State.

Then, Moscow is increasingly skeptical about the US combatting Islamists. Last year, when Putin travelled to New York, he called for “a genuinely broad international coalition” to fight the Islamic State. His efforts to bring one about on Syria, though, have fallen apart—leaving Moscow persuaded that the United States’ war on terror is insincere and opportunistic.

Finally, New Delhi has no chips to cash in because of its dogged refusal to be embroiled in its allies’ wars. Given New Delhi’s indecision on participation in the war against the Islamic State, it is not in any position to ask Russia for a return favour on Pakistan. Nor can New Delhi credibly ask the US to jettison Pakistan when India remains, at best, a marginal provider of security in Afghanistan.

New Delhi has no real ability to project military power across its borders. Its economic influence is limited, compared to that of China or even Russia.

By contrast, Pakistan profits from being a nuisance. Its covert services have birthed toxic proxies, who can spawn savage small wars across the region. This doesn’t make Pakistan popular but it does give it influence.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s failure to distinguish between performance theatre intended for audiences at home and the real business of power has caused India some embarrassment. This is a good time to learn lessons, time for a clear-eyed, unsentimental look at the problem—and for learning some painful lessons.


http://indianexpress.com/article/op...a-did-not-name-pakistan-on-terrorism-3087651/

Very simple...China and Russia are not impacted by Pakistan where as India is...And we understand that no one really supports to other nation as long as they see any benifit of supporting it...India does not offer any thing substantial to neither China nor Russia to support the cause...