What's new

Breaking : PM Imran to show 'threat letter' to senior journalists, allies today

Is the anti America sentiment in Pakistan big enough to win national elections for Imran? :pop:
 
  • Army is NOT anti Imran.
  • Army wants to stay out of politics.
  • Army wants IK to lead himself and this perception pushed by opposition parties that IK was brought in by establishment to be buried.
  • Army wants political maturity in Pakistan
  • Army wants a strong administrator in Punjab
  • Army would obey orders of its PM but would not do anything unconstitutional and out of the way to protect his seat
  • People spewing hate towards armed forces are either working on foreign agendas OR becoming a tool for promoting foreign narratives.


giphy-downsized-large.gif
 
Last edited:
Will the PM also public the agreements with IMF and World Bank?
 
in the evening a "concerned citizen" went to his highness Athar MinAllah got court order in minutes

because Pak Judiciary is known for "speedy" justice

Painting:
Judgement of Cambyses: The skinning of Sisamnes


1648690086196.png


The painting in question, The Judgment Of Cambyses by Gerard David, depicts in graphic detail an executioner flaying alive the corrupt Persian judge Sisamnes. According to Greek historian Herodotus, Persian Emperor Cambyses II ordered Sisamnes skinned alive for delivering an unjust verdict after accepting a bribe (from the Establishment of Pakistan maybe).
 
any speedy justice on memo gate and or dawn leaks ?

The guy responsible is living comfortably in USA


ALSO

that was the NRO decade.. we sold 10 years of our life to US for money in return(kerry luger bill)

Matlab Kuch b? Then why establishment supported BAP n Zain n gave protection to MQM. For 75 years they played this game but now they are Neutral, especially when US is trying it's best to influence our internal politics. I still think it's a grand plan of ISI n COAS to roundup all the culprits n catch them red handed n have a firm grip on them but then keeping in mind our history, we lost half of country over personal egos n lack of farsightedness n Pre-emtive and proactive steps taken by establishment using reactive tactics. These polticians have used legal ways to bring an illegal regime change.
Pakistan Army doesn't even purchase as such from US now...most of the stuff is coming from China.. Our forces are in a position like never before to make their move.
 
Last edited:
Beware of the Establishment goalkeepers on this forum who are sharing the WRONG letter in order to dilute the importance of the letter. The Establishment has already given task to liberal twitter, journalists, and media houses to make fun of the letter, according to Makhdoom Shahab)

The following tweet is probably the best description of the letter sent by the Pakistani diplomat. The situation is very concerning:


View attachment 828771
View attachment 828772
View attachment 828773
That's the crux. US clearly named IK and called him a man of problem. When Pakistnai diplomats explained them its a united policy they again repeated no its just that man. Meaning, they were on board with Pakistani military establishment as well. Bajwa has already said in LUMS that IK cannot be tamed, he follows his own line.
 

Just listen to last 7,8 minutes. Spot on 👍. When we have domestic kingmakers, we don't need external ones to do that dirty job instead.
 
Listen this, he was there in the meeting with IK yesterday where that letter was discussed with the journalists. He summed up the best especially his personnel assessment that US doesn't like to listen a man who has the balls to say absolutely not on their face especially a man from third world country.

 
Their inaction? Not just now but historically, there was no action against these traitors.
Traitors! This country is teeming with traitors at the highest posts. 😎👽👻✌️

Lol almost every person on some powerful seat has done similar treachery at least once in his lifetime. How many treason cases are you willing to run in the courts? And how would you run treason cases against the ever ready to be sold and serve judges in the courts!

Just politicians aren't the only one who commit these crimes. There's a whole lot of status quo involved including your beloved IK and his cabinet members, all other political leadership, MNAs, MPAs, lawyers, judges, bureaucrats, civil servants, Military's elite/top brass, political wings of intelligence agencies etc etc. They all are the guarantors and protectors of each other and help grow each other. Anyone of them can't be neutralized individually while other is present and strong, well dug into it's position. They have each other's seeds, they would keep springing up each other like a never ending plague.
 
But I am sure the government heads are debating this in with themselves too, and contemplating the options.

They have shared it otherwise with the military top brass as well.

So the better question could be, why is the govt not calling an NCA meeting? There must be some argument by the government against calling the meeting, and I am very interested to know what that is. Why not take it to the court?

Again, showing it to journos or allies is fine and dandy, but the punishment is to be decided by the court and in a legal manner.
Correspondence was received 23 days ago. No outcry in last 3 weeks. So called “Relevant circles” are either incompetent or themselves are part of conspiracy. In my view, they are incompetent because I know few people there, who were total dismissive of the correspondence as nothing to worry about.
 
Correspondence was received 23 days ago. No outcry in last 3 weeks. So called “Relevant circles” are either incompetent or themselves are part of conspiracy. In my view, they are incompetent because I know few people there, who were total dismissive of the correspondence as nothing to worry about.

Perhaps they just discussed it within themselves and there was no need to bring it to the public?

Is tarah to har roz mulk ko threats ati hain, some veiled, some blatant.

Again, it depends on the exact nature of the correspondence between the ambassador and the official. Was he called ONLY to convey that Pakistan will bear the consequences of IK? Or was that a secondary remark as part of a larger discussion? Many more questions, and the answers to those will tell whether the response has been appropriate or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom