dabong1
<b>PDF VETERAN</b>
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 4,417
- Reaction score
- 1
Whether we trained them before or not is not relevant to the actions that need to be taken by the Pakistani Government, now that those that we trained are turning against us. They were not trained to kidnap civilians, and law enforcement personnel in Pakistan, they were not trained to murder Pakistani soldiers, nor were they trained to create a state within a state. They were trained to fight the Soviets and they were trained to fight the Indian occupation in Kashmir. If now they want to start attacking Pakistani civilians and security forces, then they need to be brought to justice. Just because we may have made a mistake in the past does not mean we cannot work to rectify that mistake now. This operation was exactly that.
The argument in favor of starving them out would not have worked because everyone was under the impression that Ghazi had hundreds of innocent women and children with him. Ghazi himself said that he had 1800 people with him. From the point of view of the government, if they tried to starve them out, what guarantee was there that the militants would not allow the hostages to starve and die first, while they hoarded the food for their own survival? Thinking about hundreds of innocent children starving to death, one day at a time, does not sound very humane to me. Compared to that, an assault seemed a much better option.
The only people putting the blame on the Government are the ones having trouble reconciling with the unethical, immoral and criminal activities of the Mullah bradran; because these people carried out these activities under the name of "Shariah", "Morality" and "Islam". People are blaming the government because they give some sort of "blanket approval" to anything even remotely connected to Islam. One caller cryin on Aaj; "hukoomat ko mubark ho, unhon ne bechare Maulviyon ko mar diya".
So because this was a "masjid" and these brothers were "Imams" and "Ghazis" and they were trying to "implement Shariah", we have to treat them under a different set of rules? Forget the kidnappings, the assaults, the illegal trials, the murder of a ranger, the storage of illegal arms. "Ye becharay Maulvi to bas Shariat lane ki koshis kar rahe they".
Do you think that if this was a gang of dacoits kidnapping people for ransom, that anyone would think twice about supporting the operation against them? Of course not. But because they claim to be "representing "Islam", the exact same crimes of kidnapping and murder need to be "negotiated". This position is preposterous. It shows how much of a hold these Mullahs exercise over them masses in the name of Islam.
The reason these "Islamic groups" and Madrassahs have gotten to this point is BECAUSE we have been letting them get away with their criminal activities so far. Ending this situation is not going to be easy or bloodless, but it has to be done.
Six months ago the lal masjid mob was going around doing what they wanted,where the hell was mushy then.
The lal masjid is in the heart of islamabad and you are telling me the military did not know what was going on? If they are that incompetent in there jobs how can we trust them to know what is going on in india if they do not know what is going infront of them.
I do not recall the lal masjid people going to the army HQ and attacking them,was it not the army went to lal masjid and attacked them?
Follow the law,what a pathetic argument coming from mushy.
Did he follow the law when he took power by force?
Will they be any inquiry?