Pomegranate
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/Major.jpg)
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
- Messages
- 2,149
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Breaking! Narinder Modi admitted that there was no surgical strike in pakistan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Breaking! Narinder Modi admitted that there was no surgical strike in pakistan
Why not India claim Azad kashmir since Kashmir is atootang of India?What an idiotic conclusion. Really brain-damaged thing to understand.
Why not India claim Azad kashmir since Kashmir is atootang of India?
Lies only nothing less or more if not then why India tries to capture Siachin?
Our elders told Baniya's are liars "bagal mien churi munn mien ram ram"
I am agreed not all the Indians are baniyaz but they are converting to chanakayas doctrine rapidly and becoming rabid.Your elders must be right. But all Indians are not banias. If you repeat it, I will be very displeased.
Siachen was not occupied, its inhabitants do not exist. And the IA got there first, so what exactly is your problem?
India always maintained it did not attack Pak or Pak army, we did surgical strikes on militants, not sure why you are being purposefully ignorant here
What an idiotic conclusion. Really brain-damaged thing to understand.
Breaking! Narinder Modi admitted that there was no surgical strike in pakistan
First you say there are militants in azad kashmir now you say you didn't attack PAK but you did surgical strikes on militants??? WHERE? What piece of land did you do surgical strikes on if not Pak? And militants can be killed without surgical strikes you know.India always maintained it did not attack Pak or Pak army, we did surgical strikes on militants, not sure why you are being purposefully ignorant here
Pakistanis are still suffering with the trauma due to our strike against militants in their soil.