Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both Prithvi-III and Dhanush were upgraded to use a small low thrust first stage to increase velocity a bit.
But they remain far slower than an incoming IRBM warhead.
Radar doesn't need to have 5000 km range to intercept similar range incoming missile, science 101
Ministry of Defence
11-February, 2017 18:28 IST
India Successfully Test Fires Exo-Atmospheric Interceptor Missile
At 0745 hrs today, India successfully conducted a test wherein an incoming ballistic missile target was intercepted by an exo-atmospheric interceptor missile off the Bay of Bengal.
With this commendable scientific achievement, India has crossed an important milestone in building its overall capability towards enhanced security against incoming ballistic missile threats. It has entered an exclusive club of four nations with developing capabilities to secure its skies and cities against hostile threats.
Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Shri Manohar Parrikar lauded the efforts of the DRDO and all the scientists involved for their dedicated efforts in this significant achievement.
Both Prithvi-III and Dhanush were upgraded to use a small low thrust first stage to increase velocity a bit.
But they remain far slower than an incoming IRBM warhead.
Any BMD capability is a good achievement looking at the technical difficulties.When the targets are reentering , that speed matters, not the launch speed. So the two stage solid fuel target was developed keeping this in mind.
But Re-entry speed is proportional to Launch speedWhen the targets are reentering , that speed matters, not the launch speed. So the two stage solid fuel target was developed keeping this in mind.
In mid level flight BM has fixed trajectory and only end terminal phase maneuvering starts,
The assumption that MIRVs are deployed just prior to reentry is flawed. The fact is that MIRVs begin deployment as soon as the the boost phase finishes and the PBV corrects the trajectory, to achieve maximum spread (if needed).Ah ok thanks.
This would be a mid alt interceptor then.
High alt would be like THAAD which is 150 km+.
If India can get a working system for 200km interception altitude, most MIRV capable missiles from the neighbourhood will be countered given interception can be done before separation. Though the crucial technology for that will be the radars and sat based sensors needed.
That is a fragmented warhead trial, it proves nothing unless the BMD is proven against Agni-I/II's faster separable RVs.for those who think that we have tested our BMD against Prithvi size target, it was tested against Prithvi RV, many times. including testing of its warhead on land.
here some test results
AAD warhead
Thanks Mr. Saya.
They don't need to be faster than incoming missile as it is based on head on/side ways interception parameter, not like in chase down mode.Both Prithvi-III and Dhanush were upgraded to use a small low thrust first stage to increase velocity a bit.
But they remain far slower than an incoming IRBM warhead.
For this we have swordfish along with Green pine radar in our inventory. It can detect 3 inch object from long range, initial radar had upto 800 km range which has been already upgraded now. Further there are two far more deadly defensive weapons in making which practically you can say are offensive weapon.The launch speed is irrelevant- Once the ReV is released in the space speed is proportional to the height(altitude/apogee) and weight of ReV- It applies for everything from an ICBM to a stone/rock dropped from space-
To detect launch at such great ranges- satellite is used- Although such Radars are needed for Mid-Course interception- Which should be the next step-
Incoming missile is most of the time faster but Indian ballistic missile defense PDV is two stage solid fuel missile with high g pulling capability in space. In space no matter how fast you are going, you can be predicted much easily than in lower atmosphere.Obviously an incoming Shaheen series Warhead barging down at Mach 13+ or Mach 17+ in case of Shaheen-3 and and Ababeel , will be very difficult to intercept for such a slow moving BMD
Before re-entry missile is venerable to mid course interception of effective tracked effectively.Any BMD capability is a good achievement looking at the technical difficulties.
But should Pakistan worry? Not yet.
May be the system is dangerous for our SRBM such as Abdali and Ghaznavi , but not for anything else.
But Re-entry speed is proportional to Launch speed
We do have mid course interception in testing phase while terminal phase is tested already being short range detection and tracking.And u guys have tested a terminal phase interceptor... u dont even have a programe for mid course one
Which again refers to same parameters that until it does the re-entry, it is easier to intercept it than when it has already entered the atmosphere. If you have a ABM which can pull respected degree of g in space, it does have a good probability of successful interception. A boost phase interception is far easier to do than a mid course and again mid course is far more easy to intercept largely due to fixed flight ballistic path/trajectory.India's best bet at an effective BMD against Pakistan is a satellite-aided, networked, airborne laser based defense. Both the mid-course and terminal interceptions are too easy to overcome, at a fraction of the cost.
The assumption that MIRVs are deployed just prior to reentry is flawed. The fact is that MIRVs begin deployment as soon as the the boost phase finishes and the PBV corrects the trajectory, to achieve maximum spread (if needed).
As stupid as this example may sound, its kind of like the blue bird which splits into 3 in Angry Birds. There is absolutely no compulsion to deploy them just before reentry, as the vehicle is already out of the atmosphere by the time boost phase terminates and everything is ballistic from thereon.
That is a fragmented warhead trial, it proves nothing unless the BMD is proven against Agni-I/II's faster separable RVs.
Incoming missile is most of the time faster but Indian ballistic missile defense PDV is two stage solid fuel missile with high g pulling capability in space. In space no matter how fast you are going, you can be predicted much easily than in lower atmosphere.
Before re-entry missile is venerable to mid course interception of effective tracked effectively.
We do have mid course interception in testing phase while terminal phase is tested already being short range detection and tracking.
Which again refers to same parameters that until it does the re-entry, it is easier to intercept it than when it has already entered the atmosphere. If you have a ABM which can pull respected degree of g in space, it does have a good probability of successful interception. A boost phase interception is far easier to do than a mid course and again mid course is far more easy to intercept largely due to fixed flight ballistic path/trajectory.
Missile has the capability to cross 150+ kms in altitude with a specified g, missile can pull in space, that might be the reason he mentioned it. However wait for sometime, there are two big project coming online by the time this government term ends.
Modi talking about this test in a election rally in UP. I think it was a big test. PMO was involved. He is talking about the test with capabilities to go beyond 150 km altitude.
US did that in 80s. Check it out.
India has manoeuvring warheads. but Pakistan dont. So no worry.