Listen man, dont twist my words. At that time i said that i wont say rest in peace to those who were watching ****, they need plenty of dua e maghfirat from their loved ones. You twisted my words and claimed that i support such attacks. I clarified that i dont support death for watching **** but it is an unislamic activity and is also punishable by pakistani law. Shama cinema is notorious for ****, even many articles are written about it. Then you went on saying that every man has right to watch **** blah blah (you went off-topic)
Now you are twisting my post again, what is your agenda? Are you angry that i do not support **** which you watch on daily basis and probably do cruelty to your uzw e tunasul while watching it.
The only person twisting words and doing personal attacks here is you. I'm not sure what uzw e tanasul is, but clearly it is something that you care deeply about. I'm not really into **** if you must know - but my sexlife is of no concern to you. It only concerns myself and the people I share it with.
I told you clearly last time, that what you did was a classic tactic of blaming the victim and justifying the perpetrator. I gave a parallel of people who say ''I don't agree with the rape, but why didn't she wear a longer skirt?" It is a disguised way of condoning the perpetrator. When people die in a bomb blast, and you CLAIM that they were watching ****, and that allah won't be happy, it is a way of blaming the victims, and saying that they deserved it, and therefore BY LOGICAL EXTENSION justifying the bombers. That logical extension is palinly there, whether you see it or not. It is an inescapabe logical corollary.
The persn who wnt off topic is you, because the topic was a bomb blast, and you talked about **** being unislamic, when there was no report that **** was being shown there.
Now coming to this thread, where did I twist your post? I simply asked you why you drew a different conclusion this time, although the data set was the same. This tiim you did not say that people were taking the law into their own hands because the govt refused to, which is what you said last time. This time you think it is a false flag attack. I did not twist anything, merely asked a question, as to why different conclusions each time.
Now instead of speculating on whether I watch **** or not, and what I do with my uzw e whatever, try to answer the simple question.
Frankly speaking, I miss Asim Aquil. During his time, terrorist sympathizers were not allowed to use this forum to spread confusion. A lot has changed since his time, and I am afraid, not for good as far as terrorist-sympathizers and religious fanatics is concerned. Now I am under impression that the forum is not moderated at all. Use of profane language is common and contribution from TTs and other senior or informed posters is little.
Actually that may be a good thing. Terrorist symapthizers are not spreading confusion, but only exposing their own confusions. You can see how one of them started personal abuses against me instead of answering my question. Exposing their lack of proper argument is a better way of eliminating their ideology than censoring them.
. What these morons will answer on the judgement day ?
