What's new

Black Hole mystery: This time, they say, Einstein might really be wrong

Even stars are like specks of dust in wast universe. U cant see them in any telescope except by the light they produce. And black holes are singularity, they have zero size, and if u talk about event horizon, its just several kms for average black hole.



This what u may to see if u will be really really close to black hole. But nearest black hole to us is 1000 light years away.

Dear did you check my link? It was the smallest blackhole discovered so far.. which was also 3.8 times massive as sun... come on..

Blackholes aint small, but their, but from where they are produce is, which is actually equal to the core of the star from where these blackholes born. Anyhow that's offtopic anyway.

OnTopic, Black Hole can't reject the relativity theory.. if something conflicting is coming then it is blackhole to be blame not Einstein..
 
Dear did you check my link? It was the smallest blackhole discovered so far.. which was also 3.8 times massive as sun... come on..

Blackholes aint small, but their, but from where they are produce is, which is actually equal to the core of the star from where these blackholes born. Anyhow that's offtopic anyway.

OnTopic, Black Hole can't reject the relativity theory.. if something conflicting is coming then it is blackhole to be blame not Einstein..

Mass of black holes is very tightly packed and even 3.8 times more massive than sun black hole would have virtually zero diameter.

Chandrasekhar limit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
too small?



Blackhole ain't small... but yes they are smaller then their parent star.. now it depends how big the star was... In case of smaller star, smaller then sun.... gravitation field after death of star isn't high enough to form blackhole, so they get spread in the space... which are call small big bangs in the universe, which continue to happen...But again all is the theory.. If you get the chance then see actual telescope snaps from which theory of Blackhole was proposed...

BH_LMC.png


Contact_doughnut.jpg


COSMOS
 
Our current theory of gravity needs to undergo a fundamental transformation more radical than the switch from Newtonian to Relativistic explanations.

Right now, we have a hodge podge of ad hoc explanations which, if proposed by someone other than the ordained priesthood, would be laughed out of the room.

Premise: gravity is described by Newton's (or Einstein's) formula
Problem: galaxies remain tightly wound and are not unwinding while they spin
Silliness #1: there is 'dark matter' which accounts for the missing mass holding the galaxies intact
Problem: galaxies are receding from each other faster than should be expected
Silliness #2: there is 'dark energy' which causes repulsion between matter

Rather than keep adding on more ad hoc 'dark' things, we probably need a fundamental rethink of gravity.
 
Back
Top Bottom