What's new

BJP MLA To Muslims: Sacrifice Sons Instead Of Animals, Do Not Visit Durga Pandals

Nop buddy, the story is a bit different, she isn't correct , the son didn't convert into a lamb, when Abraham removed his bindfold, he saw the son safe at some distance, he had sacrificed a lamb instead, the son was replaced with lamb, didn't convert !!!
Yes. Of course. The lamb did not convert. I meant the lamb was replaced. As if the son was not under his blade from the beginning. He was prepared to sacrifice his son. Raised his blade. Removed his blindfold and saw lamb. Son was safe.
 
.
I agree:Muslims should not visit druga worship idol then.
However,the actual story was that Abraham(A.s) was prophet[the messenger of Allah] and Allah wanted to test as if Abraham (AS) loves him more than his family and son.In order to test him,''He'' instructed him to sacrifice his son.Abraham(AS) saw that thrice and then he took his son,telling him what he was instructed.To prevent son's love to overtake god's command,he tied cloth around his eyes and began to put him for sacrifice.As he put him in,his test was completed,Allah commanded archangel Gebriel(a.s) to replace him with animal and then they were told that they and their generations will be given honor and respect and their lineage is chosen for last prophet(PBUH).
In the memory of honor given by Allah to them,we celebrate this event.
So,what she has to do with it?If I am sacrificing cow or goat or camel,it is my choice.What hindus will feel if we told them that they should not do this and that.It appears to me as if she is mocking such glorious event.
Religious discussions not allowed!

Regards
She just wanted to be awarded like all her brothers in faith/ideology...

Sanjeev Baliyan: From riot accused to central minister - The Times of India
Muzaffarnagar riot accused BJP MP in top AMU decision making body - The Hindu
Z+ security cover for Muzaffarnagar riots accused BJP leader Sangeet Som - The Times of India

Calling for the death of elected individuals by terrorists is high treason.
No its called good riddance...:police:
 
. . . . . . .
Yes. Of course. The lamb did not convert. I meant the lamb was replaced. As if the son was not under his blade from the beginning. He was prepared to sacrifice his son. Raised his blade. Removed his blindfold and saw lamb. Son was safe.

The whole meaning of this son sacrifice and replacing it with the lamb was nothing but was to condemn human sacrifices .
 
. . .
SC refuses to interfere with animal sacrifice as religious practice | Zee News

Last Updated: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 - 00:46

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to interfere with the religious practice of sacrificing animals to please gods and goddesses across the country on the plea that it amounted to cruelty to animals under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

Declining to entertain the PIL by Varaaki, a Chennai-based journalist, a bench of Chief Justice H.LK.Dattu and Justice Amitava Roy said that how could it pass an order to prevent animal sacrifice when as a religious practice, it has the sanction of law.

The court said this as senior counsel Raju Ramachandran, appearing for Varaaki, told the court that when animals are slaughtered at slaughter houses, it is governed by rules and regulations and animals are slaughtered by trained people.

Ramachandran told the court that during religious practices, the animals are killed by untrained people causing unnecessary cruelty to them. He said that at times, animals are sacrificed during religious ceremonies in the presence of children.

However, Chief Justice Dattu noted that "The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act itself gives that right (of animal sacrifice as religious practice). Villagers will say that it is our religious practice for centuries to please gods and goddesses by such animal sacrifices".

The court said that it had to "harmonize all faiths and religions". "These are very very sensitive matters. We can't be blind to centuries-old traditions being followed," it said.

Allowing the PIL to be withdrawn, the court allowed Ramachandran to implead the petitioner as a party in the matter where the apex court is hearing a challenge to Himachal High Court order banning animal sacrifice as a religious practice.

IANS
 
.
Who the hell is she to tell muslims as to sacrifice what or what not?why animal sacrifice hurts her so much?are they her relatives?

regards
She is telling it to Indian Muslims, and oral butchering is non issue in presence of daily real life butchering of Muslims by BJP and non BJP alike.
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom