Bibis Crazy UN Speech
Medievalist poses as champion of modernity
By Justin Raimondo
September 28, 2012 "Information Clearing House" - Its no wonder the Israeli Foreign Ministry initially held back from releasing a transcript of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus speech to the UN General Assembly: Bibis wackiness doesnt bear close scrutiny. Perhaps wacky isnt quite the right word for his 40-minute peroration, during which he pulled out a bomb diagram and a red marker to illustrate where he would draw a red line defining the outer limits of Irans nuclear program. Cartoonish is more like it. The cartoonish quality of the bomb drawing underscored the content and tone of the speech, which was the jeremiad of a radical ideologue rather than anything one would expect from a statesman:
Today a great battle is being waged between the modern and the medieval. Israel stands proudly with the forces of modernity. We protect the right of all our citizens, men and women, Jews and Arabs, Muslims and Christians, all are equal before the law.
Israel, which privileges its priestly caste, has a state religion, and bases its national mythology on a promise from G-d, is as medieval as any of its neighbors. Aside from being a lie, however, this statement is interesting because it evokes the very same supremacist spirit that animates the controversial pro-Israel public relations campaign launched by the Jewish states extremist American supporters. Posters in the public transport system, from New York to San Francisco, proclaim:
In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat jihad.
No wonder the Israeli consulates in New York and San Francisco wont disavow those vile subway posters: Pamela Geller is the new public face of Israel.
Yes, Israel protects the rights of all citizens unless theyre Palestinians who happen to own property coveted by the settlers, in which case it doesnt. And the key word here is citizens: of course, the Palestinians in the occupied territories are not citizens, but helots, with no rights, and no protection from fanatical Jewish fundamentalists who have launched hundreds of attacks on their homes, and sought to displace them at every opportunity, with the active complicity of the Israeli government.
This idea that Israel represents modernity is rich, considering that every day Israeli society is sinking lower into the morass of religious and cultural fundamentalism, a regression that has not gone unnoticed in the West. Bibi opened his speech with biblical references, describing Jersusalem as the eternal capital of Israel and declaring that the Jewish state will live forever. Yet as we secularists know, nothing lives forever, and the idea of a city being the eternal capital of anything is a metaphor, at best, at worst a dangerous delusion. If this is the modern then one wonders how much it differs from the medieval. But lets not linger too long over the obvious. Bibi rants on:
Militant Islam has many branches, from the rulers of Iran with their revolutionary guards to al-Qaeda
but theyre all rooted in the same soil. Its not whether this fanaticism will be defeated, but how many lives will be lost before its defeated. Nothing could emperil my country more than arming Iran with nuclear weapons. To imagine what the world would be like with a nuclear Iran, imagine what the world would be like with a nuclear al-Qaeda. Theres no difference.
The Israeli Prime Minister may have been addressing the UN General Assembly, but he was really talking to the Americans, whose fear and loathing of the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks can always be counted on to raise them to new levels of hysteria. Outside that context, however, equating the Iranians with Al Qaeda makes about as much sense as likening the late unlamented Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden and, hey wait, didnt we hear that equation made endlessly in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq? Yet this was not a time for subtlety from the Israeli Prime Minister the cartoon bomb ended all hope of that but for the crudest sort of propaganda, which is, of course, war propaganda.
Imagine if Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, who addressed the UN that day minutes before Netanyahu took the stage, had said: Militant Judaism has many branches, from the Washington offices of AIPAC to the center of Jewish power in Tel Aviv but theyre all rooted in the same soil of intolerance? Picture him conjuring images of violent Jewish fanaticism not a hard task, given what is happening in Israel today. If he had done so, Abbas would have been denounced in every Western capital as the 21st century incarnation of Hitler.
Netanyahu went on to cite the nonexistent record of Iranian aggression without nuclear weapons an odd claim, since Iran hasnt attacked a single one of its neighbors since the Battle of Thermopylae. The country did fight one war in modern times, when it was attacked by Iraq, which was being backed by the United States. However, its necessary to remember that war propaganda has no need of facts: only emotionally-charged evocations of rage and fear:
Given this record of Iranian aggression without nuclear weapons, just imagine an Iran with nuclear weapons. Who among you would feel safe in the Middle East? Whod be safe in Europe? Whod be safe in America? Whod be safe anywhere?
That this alleged champion of modernity should base his case on fearmongering should come as no surprise: hasnt fear been the leitmotif of all the modern ideologies of aggressive nationalism? Fear of the Other, of the barbarian at the gates the savage who, at the first opportunity, will tear your throat out with his bare teeth is what keeps ideologues like Netanyahu and his American co-thinkers in business.
Those Eye-ranians, says Bibi, arent like the rest of us, which is why deterrence wont work. Irans apocalyptic leaders are awaiting the return of the Mahdi, a holy man, whose reappearance is supposed to occur after a devastating war:
Militant jihadists are not secular Marxists. Militant jihadists behave very differently. There were no Soviet suicide bombers.
Correct me if Im wrong, but arent the Israelis also awaiting the return of Someone Special, a Messiah who will lead them out of the wilderness and establish the Kingdom of Jerusalem as His earthly domain? Militant jihadists may not be secular Marxists but then again, militant Zionists arent, either. I would no more trust nuclear bombs in Bibis hands than I would in Ahmahdinejads the difference being that the former is actually in possession of such weapons.
Which brings us to the absurdity of this lecture by the leader of the only nuclear-armed country in the region: here is a nation which refuses to even admit it acquired nukes long ago, and which disdains the Nonproliferation Treaty, making the case for war against a neighbor that has indeed signed the NPT and is abiding by its requirements.
That treaty gives Tehran the right to develop nuclear power. Furthermore, there is zero evidence Iran is embarked on a nuclear weapons program: our own intelligence community tells us they gave that up in 2003 and show no signs of resuming it. Their own religious and political leaders have denounced the possession of nuclear weapons as sinful: the Israelis, on the other hand, havent bothered reassuring us they would never use the nuke they wont admit they have.
In a rational world, Israel would be in the dock, answering for its unwillingness to come out of the nuclear closet and admit what the whole world knows by now. Indeed, Bibi could give us some insight into exactly how Israel stole acquired the materials to build its formidable nuclear arsenal since, according to recently declassified documents, he was directly involved.
In the world in which we are living, however, in which the innocent are put on trial and the guilty sit in judgement, the situation is quite different. In that world, the leader of a tiny nation entirely dependent on US largesse takes to the UN podium to issue his marching orders to Washington. Here is my red line, says Bibi daring not only the Iranians but also the Americans to cross it.
Think of Netanyahus UN oration as just another Romney campaign speech, in which the GOP presidential candidate says Tehran must not be allowed to get one turn of the screwdriver away from joining the nuclear club. According to Netanyahu, Iran is nearly at that point today, and will have a nuclear weapon in less than a year if the US fails to act.
This is technical nonsense, but then again the truth has nothing to do with war propaganda: to the average American, the mere possession of weapons-grade uranium means all the Iranians have to do is plug it in and hurl it, slingshot style, in the general direction of Israel. This is an impression Israeli propagandists would dearly love to inculcate in the American public, and they have the great advantage of relying on general ignorance of the technical details. Good luck explaining to Mr. Average American why it would take a good four years after theyve weaponized their nuclear material for the Iranians to create a useable nuke.
The ticking-bomb theme, which has been used to justify everything from torture to the invasion of Iraq, permeates Israeli propaganda in the US and was a cental theme of Bibis speech. His message was clear: the hour is getting late. We must act without giving too much thought to the possible consequences. Dont delay, dont think, act now before the fraud is exposed, and we discover that as in the case of the Iraqis those weapons of mass destruction were just a figment of our easily manipulated collective imagination.
Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of Antiwar.com, and a senior fellow at the Randolph Bourne Institute. He is a contributing editor at The American Conservative, and writes a monthly column for Chronicles. He is the author of Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement [Center for Libertarian Studies, 1993; Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 2000], and An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard [Prometheus Books, 2000].
***** :** Information Clearing House: ICH
and what objectives are you talking about?
